Frequency of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Access in Patients Receiving Warfarin Therapy and Undergoing Coronary Angiography

2014 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir B. Pancholy ◽  
Imdad Ahmed ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand ◽  
Tejas Patel
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Transradial Access ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

scholarly journals Recanalization of the occluded radial artery via distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Li ◽  
Gan-Wei Shi ◽  
Bi-Feng Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Long Yu ◽  
Hao-Min Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Transradial Access ◽  
Vascular Ultrasonography ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background Radial artery occlusion is a common complication after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the transradial access. In recent years, coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal transradial access has gradually emerged, but recanalization of the occluded radial artery through the distal transradial access has rarely been reported. Case presentation A 67-year-old female with arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus was admitted to the hospital due to chest pain for three hours. She was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. After admission, the patient successfully underwent emergency coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention through the right transradial access. Radial artery occlusion was found after the operation, and recanalization was successfully performed through the right distal transradial access before discharge. Immediately after the operation and one month later, vascular ultrasonography showed that the antegrade flow was normal. Conclusions This report presents a case of radial artery occlusion after emergency coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in which recanalization was successfully performed through the right distal transradial access. This case demonstrates that recanalization of a radial artery occlusion via the distal transradial access is safe and feasible.

scholarly journals A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion—The RESCUE-RAO Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dmitrii V. Ognerubov ◽  
Alexander Sedaghat ◽  
Sergey I. Provatorov ◽  
Andrey S. Tereshchenko ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Coronary Procedures ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Background. Despite the enormous benefits of radial access, this route is associated with a risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Objective. We compared the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography and intervention after short versus prolonged hemostasis protocol. Also we assessed the efficacy of rescue 1-hour ipsilateral ulnar artery compression if RAO was observed after hemostasis. Material and Methods. Patients referred for elective transradial coronary procedures were eligible. After 6 F radial sheath removal, patients were randomized to short (3 hours) (n = 495) or prolonged (8 hours) (n = 503) hemostasis and a simple bandage was placed over the puncture site. After hemostasis was completed, oximetry plethysmography was used to assess the patency of the radial artery. Results. One thousand patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups with average age 61.4 ± 9.4 years (71% male) and PCI performed on half of the patients. The RAO rate immediately after hemostasis was 3.2% in the short hemostasis group and 10.1% in the prolonged group ( p < 0.001 ). Rescue recanalization was successful only in the short group in 56.2% (11/19); at hospital discharge, RAO rates were 1.4% in the short group and 10.1% in the prolonged group ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Shorter hemostasis was associated with significantly less RAO compared to prolonged hemostasis. Rescue radial artery recanalization was effective in > 50%, but only in the short hemostasis group.

scholarly journals Distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mhanna ◽  
A Beran ◽  
S Nazir ◽  
A Al-Abdouh ◽  
M Barbarawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Palmar Arch ◽  
Local Complications ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract Introduction Distal transradial artery access (DTRA) has recently gained attention due to potential benefits in terms of local complications and risk of superficial palmar arch ischemia in case of radial artery occlusion. Purpose In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the utility of DTRA compared to conventional transradial artery access (CTRA) for coronary angiography and intervention. Method We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases from inception through February 2021 for all the studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DTRA for coronary angiography and intervention. The primary outcome of interest was access success rate. The secondary outcomes were periprocedural local complications (site hematoma, radial artery occlusion or spasm) and procedural characteristics (cannulation, fluoroscopy, and radial artery compression times). All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model. Results A total of 8 studies including 1630 patients (805 underwent DTRA vs. 825 with CTRA), were included in the final analysis. Three of the included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the remainder were observational studies. The access success rate was similar in the two groups (odds ratio (OR): 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–2.09; P=0.43; I2=72%). Similarly, no difference was observed in the overall periprocedural local complications rate (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38–1.04, P=0.07, I2=25%). On subgroup analysis, the rate of radial artery occlusion was significantly lower in DRTA group (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.82, P=0.02, I2=0%). Regarding the procedural characteristics, the two approaches were different only in the cannulation time favoring the CTRA group (mean difference in minutes [MD] 0.96, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; P=0.02). Conclusions The DTRA represents an alternative site for radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions, with a high success rate accompanied by a low risk of complications. Although the cannulation time was longer for the DTRA, this can potentially improve with training, practice, and utilization of ultrasound-guided punctures. The major advantage provided by the DTRA is the trend toward a lower risk of radial artery occlusion, which is frequently observed with the conventional approach. Further adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Central illustration

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document