scholarly journals Distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mhanna ◽  
A Beran ◽  
S Nazir ◽  
A Al-Abdouh ◽  
M Barbarawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Palmar Arch ◽  
Local Complications ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract Introduction Distal transradial artery access (DTRA) has recently gained attention due to potential benefits in terms of local complications and risk of superficial palmar arch ischemia in case of radial artery occlusion. Purpose In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the utility of DTRA compared to conventional transradial artery access (CTRA) for coronary angiography and intervention. Method We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases from inception through February 2021 for all the studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DTRA for coronary angiography and intervention. The primary outcome of interest was access success rate. The secondary outcomes were periprocedural local complications (site hematoma, radial artery occlusion or spasm) and procedural characteristics (cannulation, fluoroscopy, and radial artery compression times). All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model. Results A total of 8 studies including 1630 patients (805 underwent DTRA vs. 825 with CTRA), were included in the final analysis. Three of the included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the remainder were observational studies. The access success rate was similar in the two groups (odds ratio (OR): 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–2.09; P=0.43; I2=72%). Similarly, no difference was observed in the overall periprocedural local complications rate (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38–1.04, P=0.07, I2=25%). On subgroup analysis, the rate of radial artery occlusion was significantly lower in DRTA group (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.82, P=0.02, I2=0%). Regarding the procedural characteristics, the two approaches were different only in the cannulation time favoring the CTRA group (mean difference in minutes [MD] 0.96, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; P=0.02). Conclusions The DTRA represents an alternative site for radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions, with a high success rate accompanied by a low risk of complications. Although the cannulation time was longer for the DTRA, this can potentially improve with training, practice, and utilization of ultrasound-guided punctures. The major advantage provided by the DTRA is the trend toward a lower risk of radial artery occlusion, which is frequently observed with the conventional approach. Further adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Central illustration

scholarly journals Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Angiography or Intervention through the Distal Radial Access: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jun Cao ◽  
Huaxiu Cai ◽  
Weibin Liu ◽  
Hengqing Zhu ◽  
Gang Cao
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Objectives. Searching the literature for coronary angiography (CAG) or intervention through distal radial access (DRA) and performing a meta-analysis. Background. Coronary angiography (CAG) or intervention through distal radial access (DRA) may have a similar success rate, low radial artery occlusion rate, low radial artery spasm rate, and low rate of puncture site hematoma for patients with coronary heart disease. Therefore, the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched, and the data were pooled for meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DRA. Methods. RCTs comparing the CAG or intervention through DRA vs. transradial access (TRA) published between January 1, 2017, and May 4, 2021, were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The endpoints included the rate of access success and the number of radial artery occlusions, radial artery spasms, and puncture site hematomas. The data were extracted, and a random-effects model was used for analysis. Results. Among 204 studies, 6 RCTs (with 2825 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to TRA, the access success rate in DRA ( p = 0.1 ) and the lower rate of puncture site hematoma were not significantly different ( p = 0.646 ), while the radial artery occlusion rate ( p < 0.001 ) and radial artery spasm rate ( p = 0.029 ) were significantly lower. Conclusion. In summary, DRA has a similar access success rate and incidence of hematoma at the puncture site, but a lower incidence of RAO and spasm compared to TRA. These findings demonstrated that DRA is a safe and effective access for CAG or intervention.

scholarly journals A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion—The RESCUE-RAO Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dmitrii V. Ognerubov ◽  
Alexander Sedaghat ◽  
Sergey I. Provatorov ◽  
Andrey S. Tereshchenko ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Coronary Procedures ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Background. Despite the enormous benefits of radial access, this route is associated with a risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Objective. We compared the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography and intervention after short versus prolonged hemostasis protocol. Also we assessed the efficacy of rescue 1-hour ipsilateral ulnar artery compression if RAO was observed after hemostasis. Material and Methods. Patients referred for elective transradial coronary procedures were eligible. After 6 F radial sheath removal, patients were randomized to short (3 hours) (n = 495) or prolonged (8 hours) (n = 503) hemostasis and a simple bandage was placed over the puncture site. After hemostasis was completed, oximetry plethysmography was used to assess the patency of the radial artery. Results. One thousand patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups with average age 61.4 ± 9.4 years (71% male) and PCI performed on half of the patients. The RAO rate immediately after hemostasis was 3.2% in the short hemostasis group and 10.1% in the prolonged group ( p < 0.001 ). Rescue recanalization was successful only in the short group in 56.2% (11/19); at hospital discharge, RAO rates were 1.4% in the short group and 10.1% in the prolonged group ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Shorter hemostasis was associated with significantly less RAO compared to prolonged hemostasis. Rescue radial artery recanalization was effective in > 50%, but only in the short hemostasis group.

scholarly journals Post-procedural radial artery occlusion and patency detection using duplex ultrasound vs. the reverse Barbeau test

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_F) ◽  
pp. F23-F29
Author(s):  
Stepan Jirous ◽  
Ivo Bernat ◽  
David Slezak ◽  
Roman Miklik ◽  
Richard Rokyta
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Duplex Ultrasonography ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Local Complications ◽  
Compression Time ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Same Day Discharge ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract The transradial approach is recommended as a first choice in coronary catheterizations and interventions, for among other reasons, the reduction in the number of local complications. A head-to-head comparison of the reverse Barbeau test (RBT) and duplex ultrasonography (DUSG) for the detection of post-procedural radial artery patency and occlusion has not yet been evaluated. In 500 patients from our same-day discharge program (age 65 ± 9.4 years, 148 women), radial artery patency and occlusion, compression time, haematomas, and other local complications were evaluated. Radial artery patency was confirmed in 495 patients (99.0%), and complete radial artery occlusion (RAO) was detected in 2 (0.4%) patients using both methods. In 3 patients (0.6%), the RBT was negative, while incomplete RAO was detected by DUSG. Superficial haematomas (˃ 5 but ≤10 cm) were found in 27 (5.4%) patients. There were no other local complications. Detection of radial artery patency and occlusion using the RBT and DUSG was comparable. The incidence of RAO in our study was extremely low. Thanks to its simplicity, the RBT has the potential to be used as the first method of detection of radial occlusion after coronary catheterizations.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Microsurgical Safety and Efficacy of Profunda Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Bei Qian ◽  
Lingyun Xiong ◽  
Jialun Li ◽  
Yang Sun ◽  
Jiaming Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Artery Perforator

Background. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap was first applied in breast reconstruction in 2010 by Robert J. Allen. It provided an alternative for autologous breast reconstruction in addition to traditional donor sites. Currently, literature reporting its microsurgical safety and efficacy is relatively sparse and heterogeneous. Objective. To clarify the evidence regarding microsurgical safety and efficacy of PAP flap in breast reconstruction, which may contribute to future surgical decision-making. Methods. Multiple databases were systematically searched by two independent reviewers. The result was statistically analyzed with Meta command of R GUI 3.5.1. The proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using random-effect model. Results. There were 12 studies including 516 PAP flaps meeting the inclusion criteria. The pooled surgical success rate was 99% (95% CI: 97%–100%) and overall rate of complications was 23% (95% CI: 18%–27%). The most common individual complication was wound dehiscence with incidence of 6% (95% CI: 4%–9%). The seroma rate was 2% (95%CI: 0%–6%). The hematoma rate was 1% (95% CI: 0%–2%). The partial necrosis rate was 2% (95% CI: 0%–5%). The rate of total flap loss was 1% (95% CI: 0%–3%). Conclusion. To date, this study is the first meta-analysis of microsurgical efficacy and safety evaluation of the PAP flap in breast reconstruction. This present work confirmed that the PAP flap is safe and reliable in breast reconstruction with high success rate, but a relatively low complication rate. Moreover, it might be more than an alternative to the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) in microsurgical breast reconstruction in selected patients.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTR-ARTERIAL HEPARIN FOR THE PREVENTION OF RADIAL ARTERY OCCLUSION DURING TRANSRADIAL CORONARY ARTERY CATHETHERIZATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Suppl-4) ◽  
pp. S710-14
Author(s):  
Waqas Khalid ◽  
Mohsin Saif ◽  
Aliya Halim ◽  
Anam Fatima Janjua ◽  
Kumail Abbas Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Intravenous Route ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Heparin Administration ◽  
Intravenous Heparin ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of intravenous heparin as compared to intra-arterial heparin used during transradial coronary angiography for the prevention of radial artery occlusion. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, AFIC/NIHD Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jul 2019 to Dec 2019. Methodology: A total number of 144 patients were considered for the study using the consecutive sampling technique who were undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Patients were divided into the intra-arterial group (n=72) who received 50 IU/kg of unfractionated heparin (maximal dose 5,000 U) intra-arterially, and an intravenous group (n=72) received the similar dose through intravenous route. All patients were administered 100 mcg of nitroglycerin to minimize radial artery spasm. Coronary Angiography was performedusing a 6F introducer sheath and diagnostic catheters. Early radial artery occlusion (RAO) at 24 hours after the procedure was detected by performing the plethysmographic (reverse Barbeau’s) and doppler USG evaluation. Chronic RAO was assessed 30 days after the procedure by performing the same tests. Data was collected through a predesigned proforma and analyzed using SPSS 23. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Early RAO was found in 4 (5.6%) of the patients from the intra-arterial groupand 5 (6.9%) of the intravenous group. The difference was found to be statistically insignificant (p-value 0.731). Chronic RAO was observed in 3 (4.4%) of the intra-arterial group as compared to 4 (6%) of the intravenous group. This difference was also statistically insignificant (p-value 0.683) for chronic RAO. Conclusion: Intra-arterial and intravenous heparin administration providedsimilar efficacy to prevent RAO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document