Spanish and English Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Intravenous Contrast Administration in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-230.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan A. Cowan ◽  
Yvette Calderon ◽  
Paul Gennis ◽  
Ruth Macklin ◽  
Carlos Ortiz ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Ko Lin ◽  
Yung-Sung Yeh ◽  
Chao-Wen Chen ◽  
Wei-Che Lee ◽  
Chia-Ju Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Obtaining valid parental informed consent for pediatric procedures in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. This study compared a video-assisted informed consent intervention with conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric procedural sedation in the ED. Methods A video-assisted informed consent intervention was developed to explain the process, benefits, risks, and alternatives of pediatric procedural sedation. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with a convenience sample of parents of children recommended for procedural sedation for facial laceration in the ED. Intervention group participants watched the video. Control group participants received information from physicians during conventional discussion. Participants completed pre- and post-education knowledge tests and rated their satisfaction with the informed consent process. The primary outcome was efficacy of the video intervention compared with conventional discussion. Secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction and consent refusal. A covariate-controlled multivariable regression model was used to analyze between-group differences in knowledge and satisfaction. Results There were 32 participants in the intervention group and 30 in the control group. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the intervention group (91.67 ± [standard deviation] 12.70) than in the control group (73.33 ± 19.86). The intervention group showed significantly greater knowledge score differences (coefficient: 18.931, 95% confidence interval: 11.146–26.716). Intervention group participants showed greater satisfaction than control group participants. Conclusions Video-assisted informed consent was superior to conventional discussion for informing parents during an ED informed consent process. Video-assisted informed consent may improve parents’ understanding of pediatric procedural sedation and satisfaction with the informed consent process in the ED. Institutions should develop structured methods and strategies to better inform parents, facilitate treatment decisions, and improve parent satisfaction in the ED. Trial registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT01850329. Registered 9 May, 2013 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01850329


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Yueyue Miao ◽  
Victoria L. Venning ◽  
Kylie-Ann Mallitt ◽  
Julia E.J. Rhodes ◽  
Noah J. Isserman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052094791
Author(s):  
Jia Li ◽  
Xue-fang Huang ◽  
Jie-lin Luo ◽  
Jiang-yun Zhang ◽  
Xiao-lin Liang ◽  
...  

Objective To evaluate the effects of a video-assisted education intervention on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects on informed consent of video-assisted patient education and traditional face-to-face discussion in a catheter outpatient ward of a cancer centre in Guangzhou, China, in 2018. Participants were 140 patients randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two groups: video-assisted or traditional intervention. General information, patient retention of PICC-related information, working time spent by nurses on the procedure, and patient and nurse satisfaction with the procedure were assessed. Results The time used for informed consent was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.02 ± 0.24 minutes) than in the control group (6.87 ± 1.10 minutes). The time used for PICC-related education was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.03 ± 0.28 minutes) than in the control group (5.11 ± 0.57 minutes). Nurses’ degree of satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in the experimental group (4.10 ± 0.57) than in the control group (2.60 ± 0.70). Conclusion The use of video-assisted informed consent and patient education in this cancer centre decreased nurses’ working time and improved nurses’ satisfaction. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015664


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document