54: Characteristics and Risk Factors of Patients Who Refuse Routine HIV Testing in an Urban Emergency Department

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. S18
Author(s):  
Y. Calderon ◽  
E. Cowan ◽  
J. Fettig ◽  
M. Hannon ◽  
J. Leider
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Czarnogorski ◽  
J. Brown ◽  
V. Lee ◽  
J. Oben ◽  
I. Kuo ◽  
...  

Objective. To determine the prevalence of occult HIV infection in patients who decline routine HIV testing in an urban emergency department.Design, Setting, and Patients. Discarded blood samples were obtained from patients who had declined routine ED HIV testing. After insuring that the samples came from patients not known to be HIV positive, they were deidentified, and rapid HIV testing was preformed using 5 μL of whole blood.Main Outcome Measures. The prevalence of occult HIV infection in those who declined testing compared with prevalence in those who accepted testing.Results. 600 consecutive samples of patients who declined routine HIV screening were screened for HIV. Twelve (2%) were reactive. Over the same period of time, 4845 patients accepted routine HIV testing. Of these, 35 (0.7%) were reactive. The difference in the prevalence of HIV infection between those who declined and those who accepted testing was significant (). The relative risk of undetected HIV infection in the group that declined testing was 2.74 times higher (95% CI 1.44–5.18) compared with those accepted testing.Conclusion. The rate of occult HIV infection is nearly three-times higher in those who decline routine ED HIV testing compared with those who accept such testing. Interventions are urgently needed to decrease the opt-out rate in routine ED HIV testing settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S420-S420
Author(s):  
Samuel Maldonado ◽  
Gregory Sugalski ◽  
Garry Closeil ◽  
Shobha Swaminathan

Abstract Background Despite CDC recommendations, areas with high HIV prevalence have not implemented routine HIV testing, stating among other concerns, inability to effectively link them to care. We implemented a routine HIV testing program in the Emergency Department (ED) at University Hospital in Newark, NJ that had 46,164 visits from July 2015 to November 2016 and looked at the impact of patient navigators (PN) on linkage to care (LTC) rates. Methods This was a retrospective study of all patients newly diagnosed (ND) with HIV or previously positive (PP) but lost to follow-up (LTFU) in select areas of the ED from July 2015 to November 2016. We collected information on demographics, HIV risk factor, and looked at the impact of PN on LTC by comparing months the PN was able to make personal contact compared with months when the PN was unavailable for substantial periods of time. Results A total of 9,511 individuals were screened, and 151 (1.6%) had a positive HIV test; 8 died and 2 were incarcerated. Of the remaining 141, 102 (72%) were LTC. The mean age was 49, 57% Male, 77% Black, 14% Hispanic, and 6% White. The reported HIV risk factors were 67% Heterosexual, 9% MSM, 6% IV drug use (IDU) and 18% Other. Of the patients with a positive HIV test, 60 (43%) were ND and 81 (57%) were PP. Only 52% ND patients were LTC, while 88% PP patients were LTC. Black and Hispanic patients tended to be PP (60% of both groups), while White patients tended to be ND (75% of white patients were ND). The risk factors for ND were 44% Heterosexual, 39% MSM, and 25% IDU. Average LTC while the PN was unavailable decreased from 78% to 56%. There were no demographic differences in the LTC group compared with the LTFU group. IDU had the highest rate of being LTFU at 37% followed by MSM and Heterosexual at approximately 23% each. The primary reason for LTFU was incorrect contact information in the medical record such as wrong address or phone number. PN would make 3 phone calls, send 2 letters and 1 outreach attempt. If all of those failed, the PN notified the state health department. Conclusion PN have a positive impact on LTC even in busy ED settings. Given limitations of staffing a busy ED 24/7, we need to develop strategies to link patients even if the PN is not present. To address this limitation, we plan on looking at the impact of involving medical residents to help with linkage to care after business hours. Disclosures S. Swaminathan, Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Ford ◽  
Ivan Shevchyk ◽  
Joseph Yoon ◽  
Tasleem Chechi ◽  
Stephanie Voong ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy R. Glick ◽  
Abigail Silva ◽  
Leslie Zun ◽  
Steven Whitman

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. S39-S40
Author(s):  
E. Lowman ◽  
J.B. Harper ◽  
M. Livak ◽  
S. Jain ◽  
A. Rush ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1061-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnathan M. Sheele ◽  
Cameron J. Crandall ◽  
Brandon F. Chang ◽  
Brianna L. Arko ◽  
Colin T. Dunn ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. S200
Author(s):  
N. Arfai ◽  
K. Squires ◽  
Y. Ezeala ◽  
L. Carolfi ◽  
J. Moon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document