Abstract
Background
Approximately 20% of newly diagnosed people with HIV (PWH) in the U.S. have advanced HIV infection, yet literature on current antiretroviral therapy (ART) options is limited. Discontinuation/modification and effectiveness of common regimens were compared among ART-naïve people with advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell count <200 cells/μL).
Methods
ART-naïve adults with advanced HIV infection initiating bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) or a boosted darunavir (bDRV)-, dolutegravir (DTG)- or elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/c)-based three-drug regimen between 1JAN2018 and 31JUL2019 in the OPERA cohort were included. The association between regimen and discontinuation or viral suppression (<50 or <200 copies/mL) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights.
Results
Overall, 961 PWH were included (416 B/F/TAF, 106 bDRV, 271 DTG, 168 EVG/c); 70% achieved a CD4 cell count ≥200 cells/μL over a 16 months median follow-up. All regimens were associated with a statistically higher likelihood of discontinuation than B/F/TAF (bDRV aHR: 2.65 [95% CI: 1.75, 4.02], DTG: 2.42 [1.75, 3.35], EVG/c: 3.52 [95% CI: 2.44, 5.07]). Compared to B/F/TAF, bDRV initiators were statistically less likely to suppress to <50 copies/mL (0.72 [0.52, 0.99]) and <200 copies/mL (0.55 [0.43, 0.70]); no statistically significant difference was detected with DTG or EVG/c.
Conclusions
Among people with advanced HIV infection, those initiating B/F/TAF were less likely to discontinue/modify their regimen than those on any other regimen, and more likely to achieve viral suppression compared to those on bDRV but not compared to those on other integrase inhibitors.