Whole-body vibration exposure of haul truck drivers at a surface coal mine

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1700-1704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Wolfgang ◽  
Robin Burgess-Limerick
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Truck Drivers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Vibration Exposure ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Surface Coal Mine ◽  
Haul Truck

Whole Body Vibration Exposures in Long-haul Truck Drivers

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 1274-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Ho Kim ◽  
Lovenoor Aulck ◽  
Margaret Hughes ◽  
Monica Zigman ◽  
Jennifer Cavallari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Truck Drivers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Haul Truck

Whole-Body Vibration Associated with Dozer Operation at an Australian Surface Coal Mine

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 881-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danellie Lynas ◽  
Robin Burgess-Limerick
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
High Amplitude ◽  
Vertical Vibration ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Task Characteristics ◽  
Considerable Variability ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Surface Coal Mine ◽  
Mine Sites

Abstract Bulldozers are used extensively on surface mine sites and have been previously identified as being associated with high amplitude whole-body vibration exposures. Previous investigations of this equipment have involved either a very small number of measurements, or measurements of very short duration (or both); or the data obtained were incompletely reported. This research reports 69 measurements (median duration 440 min) obtained from 15 different dozers during operation at a surface coal mine. More than one-third of vertical vibration measurements exceeded the ISO2631.1 Health Guidance Caution Zone when expressed as VDV(8). Considerable variability in measurement amplitudes was found. This was also true within measurements obtained from the same dozers on different shifts suggesting, by a process of elimination, that the remaining variability in whole-body vibration amplitude is a function of some combination of task characteristics, geology, and operator behaviour; rather than equipment-related variability, such as maintenance, suspension, seating, or track design. Short-comings in the evaluation methods provided by ISO2631.1 are highlighted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document