scholarly journals Development and validation of a quality of life assessment tool for use in kennelled dogs (Canis familiaris)

2014 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 57-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna L. Kiddie ◽  
Lisa M. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Canis Familiaris ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment ◽  
Development And Validation

Development and Validation of the Premenstrual Symptoms Impact Survey (PMSIS): A Disease-Specific Quality of Life Assessment Tool

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene V. Wallenstein ◽  
Bonnie Blaisdell-Gross ◽  
Kavita Gajria ◽  
Amy Guo ◽  
Michael Hagan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment ◽  
Premenstrual Symptoms ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Disease Specific

Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life Assessment of Spina Bifida in Teenagers ( QUALAS ‐T‐J)

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 1232-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Kawahara ◽  
Yoshifumi Sugita ◽  
Hitoshi Momose ◽  
Konrad M Szymanski ◽  
Eisuke Hida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spina Bifida ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment ◽  
Development And Validation

Qual-OT: A Quality of Life Assessment Tool

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regula H. Robnett ◽  
Jeffrey A. Gliner
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
General Idea ◽  
Single Factor ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment

The “Qual-OT” is an assessment tool that was developed to help define quality of life for the field of occupational therapy. The questionnaire was given to practicing occupational therapists (n — 194), people with spinal cord injuries (n = 78), and people with multiple sclerosis (n = 133). The information derived was used to test the premise that quality of life can be described uniformly, and that it is a construct about which therapists and clients have the same general idea. Factor analyses of the original questions yielded seven distinct factors. Single factor ANOVAs revealed that there were differences among the diagnostic groups on these factors. These differences showed that, for the most part, practicing occupational therapists obtained higher scores on the seven factors than the other two groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document