Coffee leaf litter decomposition: Short term home-field advantage in shaded coffee agro-ecosystems

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 103854
Author(s):  
Lauren Schmitt ◽  
Ivette Perfecto
2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 606-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Ayres ◽  
Heidi Steltzer ◽  
Breana L. Simmons ◽  
Rodney T. Simpson ◽  
J. Megan Steinweg ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1563-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. (Ciska) Veen ◽  
Ashley D. Keiser ◽  
Wim H. van der Putten ◽  
David A. Wardle

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-mei Fan ◽  
Kai Fan ◽  
Cui-ping Yu ◽  
Ya-ting Lu ◽  
Xiao-chang Wang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronggui Tang ◽  
Thomas H. DeLuca ◽  
Yanjiang Cai ◽  
Shouqin Sun ◽  
Ji Luo

Abstract Background and aimsAlthough litter decomposition is a vital soil ecosystem process in forest ecosystems, most decomposition models are based on short-term decomposition experiments. Prediction of long-term decomposition dynamics using short-term decomposition models may lead to unreliable results. A leaf-litter decomposition model was evaluated and verified using a long-term field trial in Gongga Mountain, on the eastern flank of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Methods A 90-month experiment employing 360 broad-leaf litter (five species) samples were conducted using the litterbag method at three elevations (2250 m, 2780 m and 3000 m a.s.l.) in Gongga Mountain. The remaining litter mass was measured to fit a mathematical decomposition model by different exponential functions (two-, three-, four- and six-parameters) and akaike information criterion (AIC). ResultsThe four-parameter model (B) employed for each litter type among the four functions showed the highest R2 and lowest AIC value. The fast and slow decomposition rate constant (kf and ks) for a given litter at 2250 m was higher than that observed at 3000 m. ConclusionsThese results indicated that the four-parameter exponential function (two-pool model) was recommended as a suitable decomposition model of long-term broadleaf litter decomposition at different elevations on Gongga Mountain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 431 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 175-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Tian ◽  
Xiangshi Kong ◽  
Jianguo Gao ◽  
Yanyan Jia ◽  
Hong Lin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document