Distal Femoral Rotation Correlates With Proximal Tibial Joint Line Obliquity: A Consideration for Kinematic Total Knee Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1936-1944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung Kia Ng ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen ◽  
Jared Ze Yang Yeh ◽  
Jade Pei Yuik Ho ◽  
Azhar M. Merican ◽  
...  
SICOT-J ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Sébastien Lustig ◽  
Elliot Sappey-Marinier ◽  
Camdon Fary ◽  
Elvire Servien ◽  
Sébastien Parratte ◽  
...  

Traditionally in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a post-operative neutral alignment was the gold standard. This principle has been contested as functional outcomes were found to be inconsistent. Analysis of limb alignment in the non-osteoarthritic population reveals variations from neutral alignment and consideration of a personalized or patient-specific alignment in TKA is challenging previous concepts. The aim of this review was to clarify the variations of current personalized alignments and to report their results. Current personalized approaches of alignment reported are: kinematic, inverse kinematic, restricted kinematic, and functional. The principle of “kinematic alignment” is knee resurfacing with restitution of pre-arthritic anatomy. The aim is to resurface the femur maintaining the native femoral joint line obliquity. The flexion and extension gaps are balanced with the tibial resection. The principle of the “inverse kinematic alignment” is to resurface the tibia with similar medial and lateral bone resections in order to keep the native tibial joint line obliquity. Gap balancing is performed by adjusting the femoral resections. To avoid reproducing extreme anatomical alignments there is “restricted kinematic alignment” which is a compromise between mechanical alignment and true kinematic alignment with a defined safe zone of alignment. Finally, there is the concept of “functional alignment” which is an evolution of kinematic alignment as enabling technology has progressed. This is obtained by manipulating alignment, bone resections, soft tissue releases, and/or implant positioning with a robotic-assisted system to optimize TKA function for a patient’s specific alignment, bone morphology, and soft tissue envelope. The aim of personalizing alignment is to restore native knee kinematics and improve functional outcomes after TKA. A long-term follow-up remains crucial to assess both outcomes and implant survivorship of these current concepts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1506-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Rames ◽  
Michael Mathison ◽  
Zachary Meyer ◽  
Robert L. Barrack ◽  
Denis Nam

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Hutt ◽  
Vincent Massé ◽  
Martin Lavigne ◽  
Pascal-André Vendittoli

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua G. Twiggs ◽  
David M. Dickison ◽  
Elizabeth C. Kolos ◽  
Caitlin E. Wilcox ◽  
Justin P. Roe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0016
Author(s):  
Peter McEwen

Objective: Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CA TKA) platforms can provide detailed kinematic data that is presented in various forms including a coronal plane graphic that maps the flexion arc from full extension to deep flexion. Graphics obtained from normal tibiofemoral articulations reveal varied and complex kinematic patterns that have yet to be explained. An understanding of what drives curve variation would allow prediction of how a preoperative curve would be altered by total knee arthroplasty. Implant position could then be tailored to maintain a desirable curve or avoid an undesirable one. Methods: An articulated lower limb saw bone with a stable hip pivot was obtained. Adjustable osteotomies were created so that femoral torsion, femoral varus-valgus and tibial varus-valgus could be altered independently. The saw bone limb was registered with a CA TKA navigation system using the posterior condyles as a rotational axis. Axial and coronal plane morphology of the distal femur and coronal plane morphology of the proximal tibia were systematically altered and a kinematic curve obtained for each morphologic combination. Femoral rotational position was varied from 100 of internal torsion to 100 of external torsion in 20 increments. Similarly, femoral coronal position was varied from 20 of varus to 60 of valgus and tibial coronal position was varied from 5.50 of varus to 10 of valgus. Curves were obtained by manually flexing the joint through a full range of motion with the femoral condyles in contact with proximal tibia at all times. Results: Varying femoral rotation has no effect in full extension but drives the curve away from neutral as the knee flexes. Maximal deviation is seen at around 900 of flexion. Internal torsion drives the curve into valgus as the knee flexes and external torsion has a reciprocal effect. Varying femoral varus-valgus causes maximal deviation from neutral in full extension. Femoral varus drives the curve from varus in extension towards valgus as the knee flexes with the effect peaking in maximal flexion. Femoral valgus has a reciprocal effect. Varying tibial varus-valgus has no effect on curve shape but does move the curve either side of neutral. Complex (parabolic) curves are caused by large rotations or the opposing effects of femoral varus-valgus and femoral rotation. The modal human anatomy of slight femoral internal rotation, slight femoral valgus and slight tibial varus produces a straight neutral curve. Conclusion: Kinematic curve shape is driven by distal femoral anatomy. The typical changes made to distal femoral articular anatomy in TKA by externally rotating a neutrally orientated femoral component will bring many native curves towards neutral. Externally rotating when the preoperative curve begins neutral and drives into varus as the knee flexes will drive the curve harder into varus. Conversely, kinematic femoral placement will reconstitute the premorbid curve morphology. Which outcome is preferable has yet to be determined.


2015 ◽  
Vol 128 (21) ◽  
pp. 2866-2872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song-Jie Ji ◽  
Yi-Xin Zhou ◽  
Xu Jiang ◽  
Zhi-Yuan Cheng ◽  
Guang-Zhi Wang ◽  
...  

The Knee ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 794-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A.M. van Lieshout ◽  
B.J. Duijnisveld ◽  
K.L.M. Koenraadt ◽  
L.H.G.J. Elmans ◽  
G.M.M.J. Kerkhoffs ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 468 (5) ◽  
pp. 1279-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Romero ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
Olaf Reinhardt ◽  
Oliver Ziegler ◽  
Oliver Kessler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document