Radiographic Classification of the Femoral Intercondylar Notch Posterolateral Rim

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1109-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lutul D. Farrow ◽  
Michael R. Chen ◽  
Daniel R. Cooperman ◽  
Donald B. Goodfellow ◽  
Mark S. Robbin
2013 ◽  
Vol 472 (5) ◽  
pp. 1558-1567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Ippolito ◽  
Pasquale Farsetti ◽  
Alison M. Boyce ◽  
Alessandro Corsi ◽  
Fernando De Maio ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 247-255
Author(s):  
Temitope O. Alonge ◽  
Olusola O. A. Oni ◽  
Colin J. Morrison

The compressive and shear stiffness of periarticular osteophytes, hypertrophic femoral intercondylar notch and normal articular cartilage were compared by obtaining force-indentation curves and applying a shear force to the cartilage/bone interface. The primary stiffness (at 0–100N load) was similar for osteophytes (391N/mm), intercondylar notch (400N/mm) and normal articular cartilage (401N/mm). By contrast, the secondary stiffness (at 100–500N load) was much higher for the intercondylar notch (493N/mm) compared to the osteophytes (410N/mm). There were two varieties of osteophytes, "pink" and "white". Compared with "pink" osteophytes, "white" osteophytes exhibited features similar to a progressively hardening material and appear to be a more mechanically suitable material as an osteochondral graft for full thickness articular cartilage defect. The shear characteristics of all the samples were similar.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1468-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hasan ◽  
Mario Zanaty ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
Elias Atallah ◽  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe overall risk of ischemic stroke from a chronically occluded internal carotid artery (COICA) is around 5%–7% per year despite receiving the best available medical therapy. Here, authors propose a radiographic classification of COICA that can be used as a guide to determine the technical success and safety of endovascular recanalization for symptomatic COICA and to assess the changes in systemic blood pressure following successful revascularization.METHODSThe radiographic images of 100 consecutive subjects with COICA were analyzed. A new classification of COICA was proposed based on the morphology, location of occlusion, and presence or absence of reconstitution of the distal ICA. The classification was used to predict successful revascularization in 32 symptomatic COICAs in 31 patients, five of whom were female (5/31 [16.13%]). Patients were included in the study if they had a COICA with ischemic symptoms refractory to medical therapy. Carotid artery occlusion was defined as 100% cross-sectional occlusion of the vessel lumen as documented on CTA or MRA and confirmed by digital subtraction angiography.RESULTSFour types (A–D) of radiographic COICA were identified. Types A and B were more amenable to safe revascularization than types C and D. Recanalization was successful at a rate of 68.75% (22/32 COICAs; type A: 8/8; type B: 8/8; type C: 4/8; type D: 2/8). The perioperative complication rate was 18.75% (6/32; type A: 0/8 [0%]; type B: 1/8 [12.50%]; type C: 3/8 [37.50%], type D: 2/8 [25.00%]). None of these complications led to permanent morbidity or death. Twenty (64.52%) of 31 subjects had improvement in their symptoms at the 2–6 months’ follow-up. A statistically significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was noted in 17/21 (80.95%) patients who had successful revascularization, which persisted on follow-up (p = 0.0001). The remaining 10 subjects in whom revascularization failed had no significant changes in SBP (p = 0.73).CONCLUSIONSThe pilot study suggested that our proposed classification of COICA may be useful as an adjunctive guide to determine the technical feasibility and safety of revascularization for symptomatic COICA using endovascular techniques. Additionally, successful revascularization may lead to a significant decrease in SBP postprocedure. A Phase 2b trial in larger cohorts to assess the efficacy of endovascular revascularization using our COICA classification is warranted.


2011 ◽  
Vol 469 (9) ◽  
pp. 2452-2460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutoshi Hamada ◽  
Kaoru Yamanaka ◽  
Yoshiyasu Uchiyama ◽  
Takahiko Mikasa ◽  
Motohiko Mikasa

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 789-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Iriuchishima ◽  
Kenji Shirakura ◽  
Hiroshi Yorifuji ◽  
Shin Aizawa ◽  
Tohru Murakami ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. 1066???1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER M. SOM ◽  
JOEL M. A. SHUGAR ◽  
SIMON C. PARISIER

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1333-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.B. Menz ◽  
S.E. Munteanu ◽  
K.B. Landorf ◽  
G.V. Zammit ◽  
F.M. Cicuttini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document