Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of Four Different Repair Constructs.

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. e76-e77
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Matava ◽  
Richard J. Mitchell ◽  
Ryan T. Pitts ◽  
Young-Mo Kim
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Mitchell ◽  
Ryan Pitts ◽  
Young-Mo Kim ◽  
Matthew J. Matava

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 2699-2706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam W. Anz ◽  
Eric A. Branch ◽  
Justin D. Saliman

Author(s):  
I.M. Zazirnyi ◽  
O.O. Kostrub ◽  
R. Smigielski ◽  
A. Andreev

Meniscal root tears are defined as radial tears located within 1 cm from the meniscal attachment or a bony root avulsion. This injury is biomechanically comparable to a total meniscectomy, leading to compromised hoop stresses resulting in decreased tibiofemoral contact area and increased contact pressures in the involved compartment. These changes are detrimental to the articular cartilage and ultimately lead to the development of early osteoarthritis. Surgical repair is the treatment of choice in patients without significant osteoarthritis (Outerbridge grades 3 or 4). Root repairs have been reported to improve clinical outcomes, decrease meniscal extrusion and slow the onset of degenerative changes. In this article, we describe the anatomy, biomechanics, clinical evaluation, treatment methods, outcomes, and post-operative rehabilitation for posterior meniscal root tears.


2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Camarda ◽  
E. Bologna ◽  
D. Pavan ◽  
F. Morello ◽  
F. Monachino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Ciatti ◽  
Armando Gabrielli ◽  
Germando Iannella ◽  
Pier Paolo Mariani

Abstract Background To arthroscopically evaluate the incidence of lateral meniscal root avulsion (LMRA) and associated intra-articular injuries in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods From April 2014 to March 2017, 532 consecutive patients were diagnosed as having an ACL injury and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The diagnosis of LMRA was made arthroscopically. The effects of gender, activity, grade of laxity, time from injury, and concomitant meniscal lesions were analyzed. Results Among 532 patients, 497 (93.4%) underwent primary ACL reconstruction and 35 (6.5%) underwent revision procedures. 383 were acute or subacute injuries (less than 6 months from injury to surgery) and 149 chronic (more than 6 months). Average age was 30.4 years (DS: ± 11.04); there were 422 (79.3%) males and 110 (20.6%) females. A LMRA associated with the ACL injury was detected in 72 cases (13.5%), with a significant prevalence observed in males ($${\chi ^2}$$ χ 2 = 4.65; P = 0.031, statistically significant). In the 149 patients with a chronic injury, 27 patients had LMRA (18.1%), while 45 of the 383 patients with an acute or subacute injury had LMRA (11.7%). There was a tendency, albeit not significant ($${\chi ^2}$$ χ 2  = 3.721; P = 0.054), for the prevalence to increase with time since the initial ACL injury. LMRA was significantly associated ($${\chi ^2}$$ χ 2 = 7.81; P = 0.006) with a meniscocapsular tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (ramp lesion). No other significant associations, such as with severity of A-P translation (as measured by KT-2000) or activity level, were detected. Conclusion LMRA is a relatively common injury associated with both acute and chronic ACL tears. A relatively high incidence in cases of chronic ACL insufficiency suggests that LMRAs do not heal spontaneously or that they may appear with time, even when absent at the time of the initial injury. Level of evidence Level III, cross-sectional study.


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 150-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelby E. Jarrell ◽  
John R. Owen ◽  
Jennifer S. Wayne ◽  
Robert S. Adelaar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document