The Functional Impact of Home-based Self-rehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Root Repair

Purpose: COVID-19 pandemic makes outdoors rehabilitation a potential hazard. Patient education to perform simple home-based exercises seems to be an interesting and sometimes a mandatory option. This study provides a comparison between the conventional and home-based virtual rehabilitation after surgical repair of medial meniscus root tears. Methods: All patients who underwent MPRT repair with a modified trans-tibial pull-out technique from March 2019 to March 2021 were evaluated. Those who underwent surgery after December 2019 were trained to perform self-rehabilitation. The rest had undergone outdoors specialized rehabilitation according to a unified protocol and these were used as a historical control group. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 year after surgery. Final Lysholm scores were utilized to compare functional outcomes. Results: Forty-three consecutive patients with medial meniscal root tears were studied. Thirty-nine (90.7%) were women and 4 (9.3%) were men. The mean age of participants was 53.2 ±8.1 years. The total Lysholm knee score, and all its items were significantly improved in both groups at a two-year follow-up (p<0.05), except the “Using cane or crutches” item (p=0.065). Nevertheless, the final Lysholm knee score improvement was higher in patients who performed outdoors specialized rehabilitation and in patients with shorter time-to-surgery.Conclusion: Regardless of age and gender, home-based rehabilitation after meniscal root repair with the modified trans-tibial pull-out technique improved the patients’ function at a two-year follow-up. Nonetheless, this effect was still significantly lower than that of the outdoors specialized rehabilitation. Future work is required to clarify basic protocols for home-based tele-rehabilitation programs and determine clinical, radiological and functional results.Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic, historically controlled study

Lateral meniscal posterior root tears experience acceptable healing status after transtibial repair technique

Purpose To evaluate patient MRI results, demography and clinical outcome following transtibial repair of lateral and medial meniscal posterior root tears. Methods Patients treated with transtibial repairs of posterior meniscal root tears from 2015 through 2018 performed pre- and postoperative MRI scans. Outcome measures were continuity/discontinuity of the meniscal root and change in meniscal extrusion on MRI. Other outcomes were KOOS, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale and the Global Rate of Change (GRoC) score for function and pain at follow-up. Study design Retrospective case-series. Results Of 41 patients, 36 attended follow-up at mean 26 (12–38) months postoperatively. At follow-up, 11 out of 18 lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) versus 5 out of 18 medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repairs were classified as healed. Meniscal extrusion decreased in LMPRTs from of 2.3 ± 1.5 mm to 1.4 ± 1.09 mm (p = 0.080) and increased in MMPRTs from 3.1 ± 1.6 mm to 4.8 ± 1.9 mm (p = 0.005) at FU (between-group difference, p < 0.001). LMPRT repairs were associated with ACL injury and additional meniscal injury and were younger and with lower BMI. No between-group differences were found for KOOS, Lysholm or GRoC Function scores. Tegner scale was higher and GRoC Pain score lower in the LMPRT group compared to the MMPRTs. Conclusion Following transtibial repair for meniscal posterior root repairs, the LMPRTs had a higher frequency of healing, whereas most MMPRTs continued to extrude, despite surgical intervention. The study confirmed that LMPRTs and MMPRTs differ in demography and associated injuries.

Loosening of Posteromedial Meniscal Root Repairs Affects Knee Mechanics: A Finite Element Study

Meniscal root repairs are susceptible to unrecoverable loosening that may displace the meniscus from the initial position reduced during surgery. Despite this, the effects of a loosened meniscal root repair on knee mechanics are unknown. We hypothesized that anatomic root repairs without loosening would restore knee mechanics to the intact condition better than loosened anatomic root repairs, but that loosened repairs would restore mechanics better than untreated meniscal root tears. Finite element knee models were used to evaluate changes in cartilage and meniscus mechanics due to repair loosening. The mechanical response from loosened anatomic root repairs was compared to anatomic repairs without loosening and untreated root tears. All conditions were evaluated at three flexion angles, 0°, 30°, and 60°, and a compressive force of 1,000 N to simulate return-to-activity loading. The two-simple-suture method was represented within the models to simulate posteromedial meniscal root repairs and repair loosening was derived from previous biomechanical experimental data. Loosening decreased hoop stresses throughout the meniscus, increased posterior extrusion, and shifted loading through the meniscus-cartilage region to the cartilage-cartilage region compared to the anatomic root repair without loosening. Despite differences between repairs and loosened repairs, the changes from loosened repairs more closely resembled the anatomic repair without loosening than the untreated root repair condition. Therefore, root repairs are susceptible to loosening that will prevent a successful initial repair from remaining in the intended position and will alter mechanics, although repairs that loosen appear better than leaving tears untreated.

Meniscal Root Repair

Background: Meniscal root tears typically result from a hyperflexion/squatting injury or are in conjunction with ligamentous knee injury. Once a complete tear occurs, the meniscus is unable to convert axial loads to transverse hoop stresses which result in increased tibiofemoral contact pressure and osteoarthritis. The goal of a meniscal root repair is to anatomically reattach the meniscal root to the tibia plateau. Complete and partial healing occurs in over 93% of cases with retear rates ranging from 0% to 7%. Indications: We present a case of a highly active 21-year-old male collegiate soccer play that sustained a medial meniscal root tear after slipping on ice. Technique: An anatomic medial meniscal root repair was performed using a transtibial guide and 2 loop sutures tied over a button. Results: Full anatomic footprint coverage was able to be achieved intraoperatively and gentle range of motion from 0 to 90° of flexion did not result in gap formation. Discussion/Conclusion: Successful outcomes with full anatomic footprint coverage of the medial meniscal root can be achieved with 2-loop suture button configuration.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Root Repair With Transtibial Ripstop Technique

Background: Meniscal root tears are radial tears occurring at or within 1 cm of the meniscal root attachment. These injuries have been shown to be the biomechanical equivalent of a total meniscectomy and are thought to be responsible for a rapid progression of osteoarthritis if left untreated. Indications: Meniscal root repair is indicated if possible, with the exception of patients who have diffuse Outerbridge 3-4 osteoarthritis of the ipsilateral compartment, those who are poor surgical candidates due to age or medical comorbidity, or in whom nonsymptomatic tears are found incidentally. Technique Description: Standard 2-portal arthroscopy is performed. Once a medial root tear has been identified and concomitant pathology has been addressed, we typically begin the repair by trephinating the deep medial collateral ligament with an 18-gauge needle to enhance visualization and avoid iatrogenic cartilage injury. Arthroscopic shaver is used to debride the meniscal root as needed. A meniscal root guide is introduced into the joint and an incision is made on the anteromedial tibia for outside-in drilling of a transosseous tunnel. Drilling is performed with a 5-mm retroreaming device, and a 10-mm socket is created. Nonabsorbable suture is then passed through the meniscus using a self-capture device in an inverted mattress configuration, following by 2 cinch stitches. The sutures are then shuttled into the transosseous tunnel, and the meniscal root is reduced and tensioned in full extension, with the sutures being fixated into a suture anchor on the anteromedial tibia. Results: A recent large systematic review of 1086 patients undergoing treatment of meniscal root tear via either debridement or nonoperative management compared with meniscal repair found that conversion to total knee arthroplasty occurred in 11% to 54% of those managed via debridement or nonoperative care versus 0% to 1% for those with root repair. Discussion/Conclusion: Currently, meniscal root repair offers the greatest improvement and lowest risk of conversion to arthroplasty following meniscal root tear. The present technique offers a durable repair that we believe combines ease of execution with decreased risk of suture pull-out, by creating a ripstop-type construct. Long-term outcome studies are needed for this and other root repair techniques.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Arthroscopically Assisted Gracilis Autograft With Suture Reinforcement Technique and Transtibial Pull-out Technique in Treating Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears

Background: To compare the short-term efficacy of the transtibial pull-out technique and gracilis autograft with suture reinforcement technique in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears. Methods: A total of 64 patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears received reconstruction of the posterior root of the meniscus attachment point through the tibial tunnel between June 2018 and April 2019 were included in this study, patients were divided into 2 groups (transtibial pull-out technique group: 35 cases; gracilis autograft with suture reinforcement technique group: 29 cases) according to the different posterior meniscus root tear repair methods. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Lysholm score and IKDC score, and the demographics and functional recovery of the knee were compared between the two groups.Results: Intraoperative and postsurgical complications such as infection were not found in the two groups, and there was a statistically significant improvement in the Lysholm score，IKDC score and VAS score (P<0.001; respectively). All the patients were very satisfied with the function of their knee at the last follow-up. However, compared with the transtibial pull-out repair group, the reinforced medial meniscal root reconstruction technique with gracilis autograft group were significant improvement in the meniscus healing rates and Lysholm score, IKDC score and VAS score at the end of follow-up (P<0.05; respectively).Conclusions: Compared with the transtibial pull-out technique, the reinforced medial meniscal root reconstruction technique with gracilis autograft is advantageous for treating these patients because it is a minimally invasive procedure with superior clinical outcome and meniscus healing rates.Levels of Evidence: Ⅲ, Case-control study Retrospective comparative study

The Natural History of Medial Meniscal Root Tears: A Biomechanical and Clinical Case Perspective

Posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs) make up a relatively notable proportion of all meniscus pathology and have been definitively linked to the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). While known risk factors for development of OA in the knee include abnormal tibial coronal alignment, obesity and female gender, PMMRTs have emerged in recent years as another significant driver of degenerative disease. These injuries lead to an increase in average contact pressure in the medial compartment, along with increases in peak contact pressure and a decrease in contact area relative to the intact state. Loss of the root attachment impairs the function of the entire meniscus and leads to meniscal extrusion, thus impairing the force-dissipating role of the meniscus. Anatomic meniscus root repairs with a transtibial pullout technique have been shown biomechanically to restore mean and peak contact pressures in the medial compartment. However, nonanatomic root repairs have been reported to be ineffective at restoring joint pressures back to normal. Meniscal extrusion is often a consequence of nonanatomic repair and is correlated with progression of OA. In this study, the authors will describe the biomechanical basis of the natural history of medial meniscal root tears and will support the biomechanical studies with a case series including patients that either underwent non-operative treatment (5 patients) or non-anatomic repair of their medial meniscal root tears (6 patients). Using measurements derived from axial MRI, the authors will detail the distance from native root attachment center of the non-anatomic tunnels and discuss the ongoing symptoms of those patients. Imaging and OA progression among patients who were treated nonoperatively before presentation to the authors will be discussed as well. The case series thus presented will illustrate the natural history of meniscal root tears, the consequences of non-anatomic repair, and the findings of symptomatic meniscal extrusion associated with a non-anatomic repair position of the meniscus.