scholarly journals The use of vancomycin-soaked wrapping of hamstring grafts to reduce the risk of infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An early experience in a district general hospital

Author(s):  
Keith Hay-Man Wan ◽  
Stephen Pui-Kit Tang ◽  
Richard Hin-Lun Lee ◽  
Kevin KH Wong ◽  
Kam-Kwong Wong
2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-125
Author(s):  
KM Yaghmour ◽  
H Al-Khateeb

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament tears are a common ligamentous knee injury and are usually managed with arthroscopic reconstruction surgery using a tourniquet. The employment of a tourniquet in the management of an anterior cruciate ligament tear has been a debatable topic for some time. Here, we discuss our technique in the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament tears without the use of a tourniquet. Materials and methods We performed 26 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries using hamstring grafts without the use of a tourniquet. The outcomes measured were pain using the visual analogue scale, knee swelling, range of movement and bleeding. Results Using this technique, we have noted considerable reduction in knee swelling and pain. In addition, there was considerable improvement in the range of movement postoperatively, and there were no bleeding complications noted. Conclusions We consider ACL reconstruction without a tourniquet to be an excellent alternative to conventional reconstruction with the use of tourniquet.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 846-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Yu ◽  
Heather A. Prentice ◽  
William E. Burfeind ◽  
Tadashi Funahashi ◽  
Gregory B. Maletis

Background: Allograft tissue is frequently used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It is often irradiated and/or chemically processed to decrease the risk of disease transmission, but some tissue is aseptically harvested without further processing. Irradiated and chemically processed allograft tissue appears to have a higher risk of revision, but whether this processing decreases the risk of infection is not clear. Purpose: To determine the incidence of deep surgical site infection after ACLR with allograft in a large community-based sample and to evaluate the association of allograft processing and the risk of deep infection. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors conducted a cohort study using the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry. Primary isolated unilateral ACLR with allograft were identified from February 1, 2005 to September 30, 2015. Ninety-day postoperative deep infections were identified via an electronic screening algorithm and then validated through chart review. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood of 90-day postoperative deep infection per allograft processing method: processed (graft treated chemically and/or irradiated) or nonprocessed (graft not irradiated or chemically processed). Results: Of 10,190 allograft cases, 8425 (82.7%) received a processed allograft, and 1765 (17.3%) received a nonprocessed allograft. There were 15 (0.15%) deep infections during the study period: 4 (26.7%) coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, 4 (26.7%) methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 1 (6.7%) Peptostreptococcus micros, and 6 (40.0%) with no growth. There was no difference in the likelihood for 90-day deep infection for processed versus nonprocessed allografts (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.31-6.04). Conclusion: The overall incidence of deep infection after ACLR with allograft tissue was very low (0.15%), suggesting that the methods currently employed by tissue banks to minimize the risk of infection are effective. In this cohort, no difference in the likelihood of infection between processed and nonprocessed allografts could be identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document