Surgical Techniques to Prevent Delayed Gastric Emptying After Esophagectomy With Gastric Interposition: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 1512-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald D.L. Akkerman ◽  
Leonie Haverkamp ◽  
Richard van Hillegersberg ◽  
Jelle P. Ruurda
2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 2314-2322
Author(s):  
Sivesh K. Kamarajah ◽  
James R. Bundred ◽  
Giorgio Alessandri ◽  
Stuart M. Robinson ◽  
Colin H. Wilson ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S129
Author(s):  
Masafumi Imamura ◽  
Yasutoshi Kimura ◽  
Tatsuya Ito ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kono ◽  
Takayuki Nobuoka ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 804-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Vijayvargiya ◽  
Sina Jameie-Oskooei ◽  
Michael Camilleri ◽  
Victor Chedid ◽  
Patricia J Erwin ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe relationship between delayed gastric emptying and upper GI symptoms (UGI Sx) is controversial.ObjectiveTo assess association between gastric emptying and UGI Sx, independent of treatment.DesignWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 2007 to 2017, review of references and additional papers identified by content expert. We included studies evaluating the association between gastric emptying and nausea, vomiting, early satiety/postprandial fullness, abdominal pain and bloating. Covariate analyses included optimal gastric emptying test method, gastric emptying type (breath test or scintigraphy) and patient category. Meta-regression compared the differences based on type of gastric emptying tests.ResultsSystematic review included 92 gastric emptying studies (26 breath test, 62 scintigraphy, 1 ultrasound and 3 wireless motility capsule); 25 of these studies provided quantitative data for meta-analysis (15 scintigraphy studies enrolling 4056 participants and 10 breath test studies enrolling 2231 participants). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant difference between optimal and suboptimal gastric emptying test methods when comparing delayed gastric emptying with nausea and vomiting. On evaluating studies using optimal gastric emptying test methodology, there were significant associations between gastric emptying and nausea (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.8), vomiting (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.7), abdominal pain (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2) and early satiety/fullness (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.6) for patients with UGI Sx; gastric emptying and early satiety/fullness in patients with diabetes; gastric emptying and nausea in patients with gastroparesis.ConclusionsThe systematic review and meta-analysis supports an association between optimally measured delayed gastric emptying and UGI Sx.


Author(s):  
Tomoya Tsukada ◽  
Masahide Kaji ◽  
Jun Kinoshita ◽  
Koichi Shimizu

Background: The use of totally laparoscopic surgery with Billroth-I reconstruction (delta-shaped anastomosis) has rapidly become widespread in recent years. However, we experienced delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in the early period after introduction of this technique. To the best of our knowledge, there are no report mentioned the incision line to prevent DGE in distal gastrectomy. In the present study, we standardized the surgical techniques, including the gastric incision line and compared the short-term results before and after standardization. Methods: A total of 86 patients were enrolled in this study. 28 procedures were performed in the early period and 58 procedures were performed in the late period, and the 2 groups were compared retrospectively. Results: The operation time decreased significantly after standardization from 288 min to 224 min (P < 0.001). The median value of perioperative bleeding volume reduced from 22.5 mL to 12.5 mL (P =0.060). There were no postoperative complications related to the site of anastomosis in either group. 5 cases of DGE (17.8%) was noted in the early period, but only 2 cases (3.4%) in the late period (P =0.022). Conclusions: Standardization of the incision line after laparoscopic gastrectomy resulted in a decline in incidence of DGE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document