Effects of cutting traits and competition on performance and size hierarchy development over two cutting cycles in willow

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stina Edelfeldt ◽  
Anneli Lundkvist ◽  
Johannes Forkman ◽  
Theo Verwijst
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Martinez ◽  
Bernabe Santelices
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1461-1499
Author(s):  
Nutan Limaye ◽  
Karteek Sreenivasaiah ◽  
Srikanth Srinivasan ◽  
Utkarsh Tripathi ◽  
S. Venkitesh
Keyword(s):  

The Auk ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 811-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. J. Boland

AbstractThe breeding biology of Rainbow Bee-eaters (Merops ornatus) was studied between 1997 and 2001 in southeast Queensland, Australia. Rainbow Bee-eaters are unusual in that they combine migration and coloniality with cooperative breeding. Birds migrate from islands north of Australia to build nests either solitarily or in colonies containing ≤50 active nests that are attended by socially monogamous pairs or trios (45% of nests). Nesting was essentially forsaken during very dry seasons, whereas hatching success was reduced in wet seasons. Incubation period varied in duration, with chicks emerging 22–31 days after incubation commenced. Eggs hatched either synchronously or, more commonly, asynchronously (88% of clutches), with each chick emerging usually 0–3 days after the previous hatchling in the nest. Asynchronous hatching typically led to a marked size hierarchy within the brood, facilitating starvation of 22% of nestlings that had avoided nest disasters, such as predation or flooding. Duration of the nestling period was also variable, with chicks requiring a further 24–36 days to fledge. Nest predation by native predators—monitor lizards (Varanus varius) and yellow-footed antechinus (Antechinus flavipes)—was relatively low, affecting 10% of nests. In contrast, predation by two introduced species—dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) and, in particular, cane toads (Bufo marinus)—was extreme, terminating 49% of all nests.


1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsushi Inoue ◽  
Itsuo Takanami ◽  
Juraj Hromkovič

Author(s):  
AKIRA ITO ◽  
KATSUSHI INOUE ◽  
ITSUO TAKANAMI ◽  
YASUYOSHI INAGAKI

“Leaf-size” (or “branching”) is the minimum number of leaves of some accepting computation trees of alternating devices. For example, one leaf corresponds to nondeterministic computation. In this paper, we investigate the effect of constant leaves of two-dimensional alternating Turing machines, and show the following facts: (1) For any function L(m, n), k leaf- and L(m, n) space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines which have only universal states are equivalent to the same space bounded deterministic Turing machines for any integer k≥1, where m (n) is the number of rows (columns) of the rectangular input tapes. (2) For square input tapes, k+1 leaf- and o(log m) space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines are more powerful than k leaf-bounded ones for each k≥1. (3) The necessary and sufficient space for three-way deterministic Turing machines to simulate k leaf-bounded two-dimensional alternating finite automata is nk+1, where we restrict the space function of three-way deterministic Turing machines to depend only on the number of columns of the given input tapes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document