12. Relapse to Methamphetamine Seeking After Choice-Based Voluntary Abstinence (Contingency Management): Role of Central Amygdala and Anterior Insular Cortex

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. S5
Author(s):  
Marco Venniro ◽  
Daniele Caprioli ◽  
Michelle Zhang ◽  
Leslie Whitaker ◽  
Shiling Zhang ◽  
...  
Neuron ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 414-427.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Venniro ◽  
Daniele Caprioli ◽  
Michelle Zhang ◽  
Leslie R. Whitaker ◽  
Shiliang Zhang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianwen Chen ◽  
Lars Michels ◽  
Kaustubh Supekar ◽  
John Kochalka ◽  
Srikanth Ryali ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Ping Yang ◽  
Xinjian Li ◽  
Veit Stuphorn

AbstractIn humans, risk attitude is highly context-dependent, varying with wealth levels or for different potential outcomes, such as gains or losses. These behavioral effects are well described by Prospect Theory, with the key assumption that humans represent the value of each available option asymmetrically as gain or loss relative to a reference point. However, it remains unknown how these computations are implemented at the neuronal level. Using a new token gambling task, we found that macaques, like humans, change their risk attitude across wealth levels and gain/loss contexts. Neurons in their anterior insular cortex (AIC) encode the ‘reference point’ (i.e. the current wealth level of the monkey) and the ‘asymmetric value function’ (i.e. option value signals are more sensitive to change in the loss than in the gain context) as postulated by Prospect Theory. In addition, changes in the activity of a subgroup of AIC neurons are correlated with the inter-trial fluctuations in choice and risk attitude. Taken together, we find that the role of primate AIC in risky decision-making is to monitor contextual information used to guide the animal’s willingness to accept risk.


2009 ◽  
Vol 450 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunori Kotani ◽  
Yoshimi Ohgami ◽  
Yumiko Kuramoto ◽  
Tetsuji Tsukamoto ◽  
Yusuke Inoue ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1131-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiko Koike ◽  
Hiroki C Tanabe ◽  
Saori Adachi-Abe ◽  
Shuntaro Okazaki ◽  
Eri Nakagawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Understanding others as intentional agents is critical in social interactions. We perceive others’ intentions through identification, a categorical judgment that others should work like oneself. The most primitive form of understanding others’ intentions is joint attention (JA). During JA, an initiator selects a shared object through gaze (initiative joint attention, IJA), and the responder follows the direction of the initiator’s gaze (reactive joint attention, RJA). Therefore, both participants share the intention of object selection. However, the neural underpinning of shared intention through JA remains unknown. In this study, we hypothesized that JA is represented by inter-individual neural synchronization of the intention-related activity. Additionally, JA requires eye contact that activates the limbic mirror system; therefore, we hypothesized that this system is involved in shared attention through JA. To test these hypotheses, participants underwent hyperscanning fMRI while performing JA tasks. We found that IJA-related activation of the right anterior insular cortex of participants was positively correlated with RJA-related activation of homologous regions in their partners. This area was activated by volitional selection of the target during IJA. Therefore, identification with others by JA is likely accomplished by the shared intentionality of target selection represented by inter-individual synchronization of the right anterior insular cortex.


2010 ◽  
Vol 214 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 579-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Lamm ◽  
Tania Singer

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 560-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Catenoix ◽  
Jean Isnard ◽  
Marc Guénot ◽  
Jérome Petit ◽  
Claude Remy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary Schiff ◽  
Anna Lien Bouhuis ◽  
Kai Yu ◽  
Mario A. Penzo ◽  
Haohong Li ◽  
...  

AbstractPredicting which substances are suitable for consumption during foraging is critical for animals to survive. While food-seeking behavior is extensively studied, the neural circuit mechanisms underlying avoidance of potentially poisonous substances remain poorly understood. Here we examined the role of the insular cortex (IC) to central amygdala (CeA) circuit in the establishment of such avoidance behavior. Using anatomic tracing approaches combined with optogenetics-assisted circuit mapping, we found that the gustatory region of the IC sends direct excitatory projections to the lateral division of the CeA (CeL), making monosynaptic excitatory connections with distinct populations of CeL neurons. Specific inhibition of neurotransmitter release from the CeL-projecting IC neurons prevented mice from acquiring the “no-go” response, while leaving the “go” response largely unaffected in a tastant (sucrose/quinine)-reinforced “go/no-go” task. Furthermore, selective activation of the IC-CeL pathway with optogenetics drove unconditioned lick suppression in thirsty animals, induced aversive responses, and was sufficient to instruct conditioned action suppression in response to a cue predicting the optogenetic activation. These results indicate that activity in the IC-CeL circuit is necessary for establishing anticipatory avoidance responses to an aversive tastant, and is also sufficient to drive learning of such anticipatory avoidance. This function of the IC-CeL circuit is likely important for guiding avoidance of substances with unpleasant tastes during foraging in order to minimize the chance of being poisoned.Significance StatementThe ability to predict which substances are suitable for consumption is critical for survival. Here we found that activity in the insular cortex (IC) to central amygdala (CeA) circuit is necessary for establishing avoidance responses to an unpleasant tastant, and is also sufficient to drive learning of such avoidance responses. These results suggest that the IC-CeA circuit is critical for behavioral inhibition in anticipation of potentially poisonous substances during foraging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document