Real time microdialysis analysis for free flap monitoring: results of a pilot study

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S36-S37
Author(s):  
T. Aldridge ◽  
K. Herd ◽  
S. Colbert ◽  
R. Anand ◽  
P. Brennan
2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 905e-906e ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria R. Sue ◽  
Robert Kim ◽  
William Chen ◽  
Deepak Narayan

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. e22-e25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hun Kim ◽  
Ho Seong Shin ◽  
Sang Hwan Lee

2015 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 68-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash Chandawarkar ◽  
Dmytro Unukovych ◽  
Andrew Sartori ◽  
Stephanie A. Caterson ◽  
Edward J. Caterson

Microsurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-323
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Dakpé ◽  
Emilien Colin ◽  
Jérémie Bettoni ◽  
Julien Davrou ◽  
Momar Diouf ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 722-726
Author(s):  
Adam Jacobson ◽  
Oriana Cohen

AbstractAdvances in free flap reconstruction of complex head and neck defects have allowed for improved outcomes in the management of head and neck cancer. Technical refinements have decreased flap loss rate to less than 4%. However, the potential for flap failure exists at multiple levels, ranging from flap harvest and inset to pedicle lay and postoperative patient and positioning factors. While conventional methods of free flap monitoring (reliant on physical examination) remain the most frequently used, additional adjunctive methods have been developed. Herein we describe the various modalities of both invasive and noninvasive free flap monitoring available to date. Still, further prospective studies are needed to compare the various invasive and noninvasive technologies and to propel innovations to support the early recognition of vascular compromise with the goal of even greater rates of flap salvage.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert H. Chao ◽  
Susan Lamp

2011 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 2512
Author(s):  
Jeroen M. Smit ◽  
Clark J. Zeebregts ◽  
Rafael Acosta ◽  
Paul M. N. Werker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document