Letter to the editor regarding “The quantity of bone cement influences the anchorage of augmented pedicle screws in the osteoporotic spine: A biomechanical human cadaveric study” by Pishnamaz M et al. Clin Biomech 2018;52:14–19

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Mengis ◽  
Werner Schmoelz ◽  
Javier Melchor Duart Clemente ◽  
Luis Alvarez-Galovich
2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Pishnamaz ◽  
Henning Lange ◽  
Christian Herren ◽  
Hong-Sik Na ◽  
Philipp Lichte ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 613-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lih-Huei Chen ◽  
Ching-Lung Tai ◽  
Po-Liang Lai ◽  
De-Mei Lee ◽  
Tsung-Tin Tsai ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 1613-1614
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Gelb ◽  
Steven C. Ludwig ◽  
John D. Temple

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kota Watanabe ◽  
Morio Matsumoto ◽  
Takashi Tsuji ◽  
Ken Ishii ◽  
Hironari Takaishi ◽  
...  

Object The aim in this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the ball tip technique in placing thoracic pedicle screws (TPSs), as compared with the conventional freehand technique, in both a cadaveric study and a clinical study of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although posterior spinal surgery using TPSs has been widely applied, these screws are associated with the potential risk of vascular, pulmonary, or neurological complications. To further enhance the accuracy and safety of TPS placement, the authors developed the ball tip technique. Methods After creating an appropriate starting point for probe insertion, a specially designed ball tip probe consisting of a ball-shaped tip with a flexible metal shaft is used to make a guide hole into the pedicle. Holding the probe with the fingertips while using an appropriate amount of pressure or by tapping it gently and continuously with a hammer, one can safely insert the ball tip probe into the cancellous channel in the pedicle. In a cadaveric study, 5 spine fellows with similar levels of experience in placing TPSs applied the ball tip or the conventional technique to place screws in 5 cadavers with no spinal deformities. The incidence of misplaced screws was evaluated by dissecting the spines. In a clinical study, 40 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent posterior surgery with TPS placement via the ball tip or conventional technique (20 patients in each treatment group). The accuracy of the TPS placements was evaluated on postoperative axial CT scanning. Results In the cadaveric study, 100 TPSs were evaluated, and the incidence of misplaced screws was 14% in the ball tip group and 34% in the conventional group (p = 0.0192). In the clinical study, 574 TPSs were evaluated. One hundred seventy-one intrapedicular screws (67%) were recognized in the conventional group and 288 (90%) in the ball tip group (p < 0.01). In the conventional and ball tip groups, the respective numbers of TPSs with a pedicle breach of ≤ 2 mm were 20 (8%) and 15 (5%), those with a pedicle breach of > 2 mm were 32 (13%) and 9 (3%; p < 0.01), and those located in the costovertebral joints were 32 (13%) and 7 (2%). Conclusions In both cadaveric and clinical studies the ball tip technique enhanced the accuracy of TPS placement as compared with the conventional freehand technique. Thus, the ball tip technique is useful for the accurate and safe placement of TPSs in deformed spines.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1873-1882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Gómez González ◽  
Gerard Cabestany Bastida ◽  
Maria Daniela Vlad ◽  
José López López ◽  
Pablo Buenestado Caballero ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Shota Tamagawa ◽  
Takatoshi Okuda ◽  
Hidetoshi Nojiri ◽  
Tatsuya Sato ◽  
Rei Momomura ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Previous reports have focused on the complications of L5 nerve root injury caused by anterolateral misplacement of the S1 pedicle screws. Anatomical knowledge of the L5 nerve root in the pelvis is essential for safe and effective placement of the sacral screw. This cadaveric study aimed to investigate the course of the L5 nerve root in the pelvis and to clarify a safe zone for inserting the sacral screw. METHODS Fifty-four L5 nerve roots located bilaterally in 27 formalin-fixed cadavers were studied. The ventral rami of the L5 nerve roots were dissected along their courses from the intervertebral foramina to the lesser pelvis. The running angles of the L5 nerve roots from the centerline were measured in the coronal plane. In addition, the distances from the ala of the sacrum to the L5 nerve roots were measured in the sagittal plane. RESULTS The authors found that the running angles of the L5 nerve roots changed at the most anterior surface of the ala of the sacrum. The angles of the bilateral L5 nerve roots from the right and left L5 intervertebral foramina to their inflection points were 13.77° ± 5.01° and 14.65° ± 4.71°, respectively. The angles of the bilateral L5 nerve roots from the right and left inflection points to the lesser pelvis were 19.66° ± 6.40° and 20.58° ± 5.78°, respectively. There were no significant differences between the angles measured in the right and left nerve roots. The majority of the L5 nerves coursed outward after changing their angles at the inflection point. The distances from the ala of the sacrum to the L5 nerve roots in the sagittal plane were less than 1 mm in all cases, which indicated that the L5 nerve roots were positioned close to the ala of the sacrum and had poor mobility. CONCLUSIONS All of the L5 nerve roots coursed outward after exiting the intervertebral foramina and never inward. To prevent iatrogenic L5 nerve root injury, surgeons should insert the S1 pedicle screw medially with an angle > 0° toward the inside of the S1 anterior foramina and the sacral alar screw laterally with an angle > 30°.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document