Pull-Out Capability of a 3D Printed Threadless Suture Anchor with Rectangular Cross-Section: A Biomechanical Study

Suture anchor fixation is a common method for securing bone and soft tissue in the body, with proven applications in the hip, elbow, hand, knee and foot. A critical limiting factor of suture anchors is the pull-out strength, particularly in suboptimal bone. This study introduces a novel 3D printed threadless suture anchor with a rectangular cross-section. The titanium anchor was designed with surface fenestration and a porous central core to improve bone ingrowth. The aim of this study was to compare the pull-out properties of the novel threadless anchor with a traditional circular threaded suture anchor. The anchors were inserted into a 0.24 g/cm3 synthetic cancellous bone block at angles of 90° and 135° to the surface. The sutures were pulled at 180° (parallel) to the surface under a static pull test (anchor pullout) and cyclic load test using a tensile testing machine. Under the static load, the greatest pullout strength was seen with the novel threadless anchor inserted at 90° (mean, 105.6 N; standard deviation [SD], 3.5 N). The weakest pullout strength was seen with the threaded anchor inserted at 90° (mean, 87.9 N; SD, 4.1 N). In the cyclic load test, all six of the threaded anchors with a 90° insertion angle pulled out after 18 cycles (70 N). All of the threadless anchors inserted at 90° survived the cyclic test (90 N). In conclusion, the novel threadless suture anchor with rectangular cross-section and traditional threaded suture anchor had similar pullout survivorship when inserted at either 90° or 135°. In addition, the 3D printed threadless anchor has the potential for good bone integration to improve long-term stabilization.

In-line Pullout Strength of 2 Acetabular Fixation Methods for Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction of the Hip: A Cadaveric Study

Background: Ligamentum teres (LT) reconstruction is an appropriate alternative in select cases of LT full-thickness tears, resulting in hip micro- or macroinstability. Graft fixation at the acetabular fossa is critical to achieving the best functional results. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the pullout strength of 2 graft fixation methods used for LT reconstruction of the hip. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 7 cadaveric specimens, the acetabular socket was prepared after the native LT was transected and the femoral head was removed. Seven separate tibialis anterior grafts were then prepared by suturing a running-locking No. 2 suture on each tail of the graft. Three specimens had fixation of the graft to the acetabulum using an adjustable cortical suspension suture button; the remaining 4 were fixed to the acetabulum using a knotless suture anchor. Specimens were then mounted onto a custom jig within a mechanical test frame to allow for the in-line pull of the graft fixation construct. After a preload of 5 N, each specimen was loaded to failure at 0.5 mm/s. Stiffness and load to failure were measured for each specimen construct. Results: Suture button fixation had a higher mean load to failure when compared with the knotless anchor fixation method (mean ± SD, 438.1 ± 114.3 vs 195.9 ± 50.0 N; P = .01). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the methods of fixation (24.5 ± 1.4 vs 26.5 ± 5.8 N/mm; P = .6). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, the suture button fixation demonstrated greater load to failure than the knotless anchor fixation. Clinical Relevance: Results of this study can guide surgical decision making when selecting an acetabular fixation method for LT reconstruction.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Stability among Various Pedicle Screw Geometries: Effects of Screw Outer/Inner Projection Shape and Thread Profile

The proper screw geometry and pilot-hole size remain controversial in current biomechanical studies. Variable results arise from differences in specimen anatomy and density, uncontrolled screw properties and mixed screw brands, in addition to the use of different tapping methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of bone density and pilot-hole size on the biomechanical performance of various pedicle screw geometries. Six screw designs, involving three different outer/inner projections of screws (cylindrical/conical, conical/conical and cylindrical/cylindrical), together with two different thread profiles (square and V), were examined. The insertional torque and pullout strength of each screw were measured following insertion of the screw into test blocks, with densities of 20 and 30 pcf, predrilled with 2.7-mm/3.2-mm/3.7-mm pilot holes. The correlation between the bone volume embedded in the screw threads and the pullout strength was statistically analyzed. Our study demonstrates that V-shaped screw threads showed a higher pullout strength than S-shaped threads in materials of different densities and among different pilot-hole sizes. The configuration, consisting of an outer cylindrical shape, an inner conical shape and V-shaped screw threads, showed the highest insertional torque and pullout strength at a normal and higher-than-normal bone density. Even with increasing pilot-hole size, this configuration maintained superiority.

Effective Length Prediction and Pullout Design of Geosynthetic Strips Based on Pullout Resistance

In this study, pullout tests were conducted on geosynthetic strips which can be applied to a block-type front wall. Based on the test results, the effective length is predicted, and the pullout design results are presented. In other words, the pullout displacement–pullout load relationship of all geosynthetic strips was analyzed using the pullout test results, and their effective lengths were predicted. It was found that the reinforcement width affected the pullout force for the geosynthetic strips at the same tensile strength. The pullout behavior was evidenced within a range of approximately 0.45 L of the total length of the reinforcement (L) and hardly occurred beyond a certain distance from the geosynthetic strips front regardless of the normal stress. Based on these pullout behavioral characteristics, a method is proposed for the prediction of the effective length (LE) and maximum effective length (LE(max)) of a geosynthetic strip. The pullout strength was compared using the total area and effective area methods in accordance with the proposed method. In the case of the total area method, GS50W (width: 50 mm) and GS70W (width: 70 mm) exhibited similar pullout strengths. The pullout strength by the effective area method, however, was found to be affected by the soil-reinforcement interface adhesion. The proposed method used for the prediction of the effective length of a geosynthetic strip was evaluated using a design case. It was confirmed that the method achieved an economical design in instances in which the pullout resistance by the effective length (LE) was applied compared with the existing method.

Effect of Microimplant Neck Design with and without Microthread on Pullout Strength and Destruction Volume

The microthread neck concept has been applied to dental implants. This study investigated the pullout strength and destruction volume of orthodontic microimplants with and without the microthread neck design. Fifteen microimplants (diameter: 1.5 × 10 mm) of three types (Types A and B: without microimplant neck; Type C: with microimplant neck) were tested. The insertion torque (IT), Periotest value (PTV), horizontal pullout strength (HPS), and horizontal destruction volume (HDV) of each type were measured. Kruskal–Wallis H test and Dunn’s post-hoc comparison test were performed to compare the measured values of the three types of microimplants. The correlations of the measured values were used to perform the Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis. The ITs of Types B (8.8 Ncm) and C (8.9 Ncm) were significantly higher than those of Type A (5.2 Ncm). Type B yielded the lowest PTV (4.1), and no statistical differences in PTV were observed among the three types. Type A had a significantly lower HPS (158.8 Ncm) than Types B (226.9 Ncm) and C (212.8 Ncm). The three types did not exhibit any significant differences in the HDV. The results of the Spearman’s correlation coefficient test revealed that HDV (ρ = 0.710) and IT (ρ = 0.813) were strongly correlated with HPS, whereas for PTV and HPS, it was not. HPS was strongly and significantly correlated with HDV. The orthodontic microimplant with a microimplant neck design did not perform better than that without a microthread in the mechanical strength test.

Effect of Bidirectional Insertion of External Skeletal Fixation Pins on Axial Pullout Strength in Canine Cadaveric Bone

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bidirectional insertion on axial pullout strength of tapered run out (TRO), traditional negative profile (TNP) and positive profile (PP) pins. Study Design Cadaveric adult canine tibiae were harvested. Tapered run out pins (Group 1) were inserted unidirectionally to the desired position; bidirectionally past the desired position, then withdrawn to the desired position (Group 2); and bidirectionally as described for Group 2, repeated twice (Group 3). Traditional negative profile pins (Group 4–6) and PP pins (Group 9–11) were placed in the same manner. Tapered run out (Group 7), TNP (Group 8) and PP pins (Group 12) were driven unidirectionally such that the shaft of the pin violated the cis-cortex. A servohydraulic testing machine extracted the pins and measured axial peak pullout strength. Results Positive profile pins had significantly greater pullout strength than TRO and TNP pins placed unidirectionally to the desired position. Method of insertion had no effect on peak pullout strength of TNP pins. TRO and PP pins inserted unidirectionally to the desired position had significantly greater peak pullout strengths than insertion bidirectionally or if the shaft of the pin violated the cis-cortex. Conclusion The authors recommend that pins used for external skeletal fixation should be placed unidirectionally to the desired position with fluoroscopic guidance, intra-operative depth gauge measurements or measurements from preoperative radiographs. Repositioning pins results in loss of peak pullout strength with TRO and PP pins.

DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH

ABSTRACT Objective: Study the in vitro pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw), a screw pedicle designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods: DSG Screws of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results: Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared to line-to-line tapping. Conclusion: DSG Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.

Cement augmentation of suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair improves pullout strength: a systematic review

ImportanceRotator cuff pathology is a growing concern in the ageing population. If cement augmentation of suture anchors improves pullout strength, its application can potentially be applied in cases of poor bone quality to prevent anchor failure.ObjectiveTo evaluate the biomechanical benefits and fixation strength of cement-augmented versus non-augmented suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair (RCR).Evidence reviewA systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed to identify all published articles reporting on biomechanical analysis of suture anchors in the shoulder in a cadaveric model. Inclusion criteria required fresh-frozen specimens, placement in the footprint of the proximal humerus, and comparative assessment of fixation constructs with or without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or bioabsorbable composite cement augmentation. Biomechanical testing procedure, cement augmentation method and pullout force were assessed.FindingsAfter review of 105 abstracts, seven full manuscripts met inclusion criteria. Six of seven studies reported statistically significant differences in mean pullout force between augmented (three PMMAs, three composites, one PMMA vs composite) and non-augmented anchors. Of two studies evaluating cycles to failure, both found a significant increase in the augmented versus non-augmented anchors. Of two studies stratifying by anchor position, both investigations identified significant differences in mean pullout strength between augmented and non-augmented anchors at the posteromedial and anterolateral anchor positions.Conclusions and relevanceCement augmentation of suture anchors in cadaveric humeri for RCR improves pullout strength regardless of cement type used or anchor position. Cement augmentation may provide a viable option for future clinical application.Level of evidenceIV, systematic review.

Lateral migration resistance of screw is essential in evaluating bone screw stability of plate fixation

Conventional evaluation of the stability of bone screws focuses on pullout strength, while neglecting lateral migration resistance. We measured pullout strength and lateral migration resistance of bone screws and determined how these characteristics relate to screw stability of locking plate (LP) and dynamic compression plate (DCP) fixation. Pullout strength and lateral migration resistance of individual bone screws with buttress, square, and triangular thread designs were evaluated in polyurethane foam blocks. The screw types with superior performance in each of these characteristics were selected. LP and DCP fixations were constructed using the selected screws and tested under cyclic craniocaudal and torsional loadings. Subsequently, the association between individual screws’ biomechanical characteristics and fixation stability when applied to plates was established. Screws with triangular threads had superior pullout strength, while screws with square threads demonstrated the highest lateral migration resistance; they were selected for LP and DCP fixations. LPs with square-threaded screws required a larger force and more cycles to trigger the same amount of displacement under both craniocaudal and torsional loadings. Screws with triangular and square threads showed no difference in DCP fixation stability under craniocaudal loading. However, under torsional loading, DCP fixation with triangular-threaded screws demonstrated superior fixation stability. Lateral migration resistance is the primary contributor to locking screw fixation stability when applied to an LP in resisting both craniocaudal and torsional loading. For compression screws applied to a DCP, lateral migration resistance and pullout strength work together to resist craniocaudal loading, while pullout strength is the primary contributor to the ability to resist torsional loading.