radiation planning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

78
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Geraghty ◽  
Archya Dasgupta ◽  
Michael Sandhu ◽  
Nauman Malik ◽  
Pejman Jabehdar Maralani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Lischalk ◽  
Seth Blacksburg ◽  
Christopher Mendez ◽  
Michael Repka ◽  
Astrid Sanchez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Historically, IBD has been thought to increase the underlying risk of radiation related toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer. In the modern era, contemporary radiation planning and delivery may mitigate radiation-related toxicity in this theoretically high-risk cohort. This is the first manuscript to report clinical outcomes for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and underlying IBD curatively treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods A large institutional database of patients (n = 4245) treated with SBRT for adenocarcinoma of the prostate was interrogated to identify patients who were diagnosed with underlying IBD prior to treatment. All patients were treated with SBRT over five treatment fractions using a robotic radiosurgical platform and fiducial tracking. Baseline IBD characteristics including IBD subtype, pre-SBRT IBD medications, and EPIC bowel questionnaires were reviewed for the IBD cohort. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated using the CTCAE version 5.0. Results A total of 31 patients were identified who had underlying IBD prior to SBRT for the curative treatment of prostate cancer. The majority (n = 18) were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and were being treated with local steroid suppositories for IBD. No biochemical relapses were observed in the IBD cohort with early follow up. High-grade acute and late toxicities were rare (n = 1, grade 3 proctitis) with a median time to any GI toxicity of 22 months. Hemorrhoidal flare was the most common low-grade toxicity observed (n = 3). Conclusion To date, this is one of the largest groups of patients with IBD treated safely and effectively with radiation for prostate cancer and the only review of patients treated with SBRT. Caution is warranted when delivering therapeutic radiation to patients with IBD, however modern radiation techniques appear to have mitigated the risk of GI side effects.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Lischalk ◽  
Seth Blacksburg ◽  
Christopher Mendez ◽  
Michael Repka ◽  
Astrid Sanchez ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundHistorically, IBD has been thought to increase the underlying risk of radiation related toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer. In the modern era, contemporary radiation planning and delivery may mitigate radiation related toxicity in this theoretically high-risk cohort. This is the first manuscript to report clinical outcomes for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and underlying IBD curatively treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MethodsA large institutional database of patients (n = 4,245) treated with SBRT for adenocarcinoma of the prostate was interrogated to identify patients who were diagnosed with underlying IBD prior to treatment. All patients were treated with SBRT over five treatment fractions using a robotic radiosurgical platform and fiducial tracking. Baseline IBD characteristics including IBD subtype, pre-SBRT IBD medications, and EPIC bowel questionnaires were reviewed for the IBD cohort. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated using the CTCAE version 5.0. ResultsA total of 31 patients were identified who had underlying IBD prior to SBRT for the curative treatment of prostate cancer. The majority (n = 18) were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and the majority were being treated local steroid suppositories for IBD. No biochemical relapses were observed in the IBD cohort with early follow up. High-grade acute and late toxicities were rare (n = 1, grade 3 proctitis) with a median time to any GI toxicity of 22 months. Hemorrhoidal flare was the most common low-grade toxicity observed (n = 3). ConclusionTo date, this is one of the largest groups of patients with IBD treated safely and effectively with radiation for prostate cancer and the only review of patients treated with SBRT. Caution is warranted when delivering therapeutic radiation to patients with IBD, however modern radiation techniques appear to have mitigated the risk of GI side effects.


Author(s):  
Kumara Swamy

.This review highlights normal and tumor tissue vasculature, immunological changes, and phenotypic alterations (VIP model) as fundamental in abscopal interaction. In the stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and immunotherapy era, we are moving toward “immunological radiation planning,” i.e., radiation scheduling with abscopal effect as a vital endpoint as well. Towards this end, this manuscript presents specific diagrammatic tumor models to optimize the outcome of abscopal response in SBRT, based on the principle of the four R’s - Repair, Redistribution, Repopulation, and Reoxygenation of radiotherapy. The article highlights the importance of restricting the dose of SBRT to < 10 Gy per fraction, appropriate use of dose painting, and concomitant/delayed SBRT boost potential. Current literature indicates that immunotherapy should not precede but follow SBRT within seven days. Included is the review of integrating “cyclical” antiangiogenics, immune adjuvants/immune-metabolites as abscopal effect enhancers with SBRT. The importance of proton, carbon-ion SBRT is dealt with briefly. Proposed six fundamental requirements for augmentation of the abscopal cascade are listed. The existing exploratory results need to develop a definitive strategy amidst complex interactions in SBRT, immunotherapy, immune-adjuvants, & abscopal effects. We now have enough literature evidence to convert “abscopal by chance” to “abscopal by design” by harmonized combinatorial approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
Adenike Olanrewaju ◽  
Laurence E. Court ◽  
Lifei Zhang ◽  
Komeela Naidoo ◽  
Hester Burger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sajeev George Pulickal ◽  
Nikhil Sebastian ◽  
Reshma Bhaskaran ◽  
P Aparna

Abstract Background and aim: Radiation exposure to the thyroid gland during breast irradiation can lead to hypothyroidism and this can impact on the quality of life. The aim of this study was to analyse if there is any difference in the radiation dose received by the thyroid gland during supraclavicular irradiation for breast cancer, with two different neck positions—straight or when the head is turned to the contralateral side to the breast being treated, when using a conformal technique. Materials and methods: All patients who received chest wall/breast and supraclavicular irradiation for breast cancer in 2019 in our department were divided into two groups based on the neck position as SN (neck positioned straight) and TN (neck tilted to contralateral side). The volume of thyroid gland, the radiation dose and volume parameters for Dmax, Dmean, and V5 to V40 of the thyroid were tabulated. Results: There were 72 patients included in the study with a mean age of 59 years, with 39 in the SN group and 33 in the TN group. There was no significant difference in thyroid volume between the two groups. Dmean, V15, V20, V25, V30 and V35 were significantly lower in tilted neck patients as compared to straight neck patients. Conclusion: Neck positioned to the contralateral side of the breast primary may be recommended for conformal CT-based radiation planning.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Aravind Reddy Kuchkuntla ◽  
◽  
Aarathi Ardha Reddy ◽  

With the advent of advanced imaging techniques such as positron emission topography/computed topography, use of radiotherapy in the management of various cancers has become more effective and is shown to have better outcomes. PET/CT scanning is useful for evaluating tumour biological heterogeneity of malignant lesions providing comprehensive information regards the tumour’s metabolism, hypoxia, and proliferation. Integration of PET/CT imaging in radiotherapy helps in assessing tumour volume to achieve effective tumour control by adjusting radiation dose. Literature is extensive on PET/CT based radiation planning and here we aim to provide a brief review of PET/CT use in different malignancies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 110-119
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Alhefny ◽  
Hany S. Attallah ◽  
Mahmoud Abdallah ◽  
Adel Yassin ◽  
Khaled M. El-Shahat ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document