Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening—incidental findings

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Sohns ◽  
Markus Heuser ◽  
Samuel Sossalla ◽  
Hendrik Wolff ◽  
Silvia Obenauer
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-470
Author(s):  
Koichi Nagata ◽  
Ken Takabayashi ◽  
Takaaki Yasuda ◽  
Hidenori Kanazawa ◽  
Takahisa Matsuda ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 551-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Friedel ◽  
Shahzad Iqbal ◽  
Stavros N. Stavropoulos ◽  
Jay P. Babich ◽  
Nicholas Georgiou ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 1268 ◽  
pp. 978-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Cathier ◽  
S Periaswamy ◽  
A Jerebko ◽  
M Dundar ◽  
J Liang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-919
Author(s):  
Hammad Liaquat ◽  
Janak Bahirwani ◽  
Hussam Tayel ◽  
Brian Kim ◽  
Bryan Wey ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (22) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
JON O. EBBERT ◽  
ERIC G. TANGALOS

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Bellows ◽  
Giuseppe Gagliardi ◽  
Lorenzo Bacigalupo

Abstract New research has addressed many of the early concerns of Computed Tomographic colonography (CTC) and these studies are now beginning to shape clinical practices. A review of the literature demonstrates that the sensitivity of CTC in screening for large polyps (≥ 1cm) or cancers in the large intestine is as high as that of conventional optical colonoscopy, however, the sensitivity decreases with the diameter of the polyp. Despite this, CTC is well tolerated, more acceptable to patients than optical colonoscopy and therefore may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. This review not only describes the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of CTC, and the evolving role of CTC as a primary colon cancer screening option, but also the recent studies that have demonstrated the additional value of CTC utilization for practicing clinicians.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document