Commentary on “Evolving Role of Computed Tomographic Colonography in Colon Cancer Screening and Diagnosis”

2012 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 558-559
Author(s):  
Sunit Sebastian
2012 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 551-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Friedel ◽  
Shahzad Iqbal ◽  
Stavros N. Stavropoulos ◽  
Jay P. Babich ◽  
Nicholas Georgiou ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-470
Author(s):  
Koichi Nagata ◽  
Ken Takabayashi ◽  
Takaaki Yasuda ◽  
Hidenori Kanazawa ◽  
Takahisa Matsuda ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Bellows ◽  
Giuseppe Gagliardi ◽  
Lorenzo Bacigalupo

Abstract New research has addressed many of the early concerns of Computed Tomographic colonography (CTC) and these studies are now beginning to shape clinical practices. A review of the literature demonstrates that the sensitivity of CTC in screening for large polyps (≥ 1cm) or cancers in the large intestine is as high as that of conventional optical colonoscopy, however, the sensitivity decreases with the diameter of the polyp. Despite this, CTC is well tolerated, more acceptable to patients than optical colonoscopy and therefore may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. This review not only describes the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of CTC, and the evolving role of CTC as a primary colon cancer screening option, but also the recent studies that have demonstrated the additional value of CTC utilization for practicing clinicians.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 355-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
A N Baker ◽  
M Parsons ◽  
S M Donnelly ◽  
L Johnson ◽  
J Day ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 705-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond J Leddin ◽  
Robert Enns ◽  
Robert Hilsden ◽  
Victor Plourde ◽  
Linda Rabeneck ◽  
...  

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Digestive Health Foundation published guidelines on colon cancer screening in 2004. Subsequent to the publication of these guidelines, many advances have occurred, thereby necessitating a review of the existing guidelines in the context of new technologies and clinical knowledge. The assembled guideline panel recognized three recent American sets of guidelines and identified seven issues that required comment from a Canadian perspective. These issues included, among others, the role of program-based screening, flexible sigmoidoscopy, computed tomography colonography, barium enema and quality improvement. The panel also provided context for the selection of the fecal immunochemical test as the fecal occult blood test of choice, and the relative role of colonoscopy as a primary screening tool. Recommendations were also provided for an upper age limit for colon cancer screening, whether upper endoscopy should be performed following a negative colonoscopy for a positive fecal occult blood test and when colon cancer screening should resume following negative colonoscopy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Hoffman ◽  
Daniel Teubner ◽  
Ralf Kiesslich

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Melissa Magrath ◽  
Edward Yang ◽  
Amit G. Singal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document