Multimodal analgesia & regional anesthesia in cardiac surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.P. Marcoe ◽  
H. Wood ◽  
J.P. Marcoe ◽  
F.B. Irfan
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
M. I Neimark ◽  
Roman V. Kiselev

This review is devoted to the treatment of postoperative pain in bariatric surgery. At present, the prevalence of patients with a high degree of obesity is an epidemic that leads steadily growing number of bariatric operations. Showing the risk factors in the traditional approach to the use of opioids in these patients, as well as the consequences of inadequate analgesia in these patients. Details are presented modern pharmacological agents acting on different levels nociceptive system. Substantiates the role of a multi-modal approach to perioperative analgesia, mandatory use of regional anesthesia. The attention to the visualization neuroaxial structures using ultrasound in the context of the implementation of the efficacy and safety of regional anesthesia in patients with morbid obesity. Possible prospects for pain control in bariatric surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon S. Kandarian ◽  
Nabil M. Elkassabany ◽  
Mallika Tamboli ◽  
Edward R. Mariano

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 883-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hemmerling ◽  
Jean-Luc Choinière ◽  
Fadi Basile ◽  
Ignatio Prieto

2000 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1014-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi L. Peterson ◽  
William M. DeCampli ◽  
Nancy A. Pike ◽  
Robert C. Robbins ◽  
Bruce A. Reitz

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ibrahim ◽  
Ali M Elnabtity ◽  
Ahmed Hegab ◽  
Omar A. Alnujaidi ◽  
Osama El Sanea

Abstract Background: There is still debate as to whether opioid-free anaesthsia (OFA) may offer additional benefit over multimodal analgesia to better achieve the goals of ERAS(Enhanced recovery after surgery) in bariatric surgery.Patients and method: Patients in the OFA group (n=51) were pre-medicated with IV dexmedetomidine 0.1 µg.kg-1 then induced with propofol (2 mg. kg-1) -ketamine (0.5 mg. kg-1) mixture and maintained on dexmedetomidine 0.5µg. kg-1.h-1, ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1.h-1, and lidocaine 1 mg. kg-1.h-1. Patients in the MMA(Multimodal analgesia) group (n= 52) were induced using IV propofol 2 mg. kg-1, and fentanyl 1 µg. kg-1. Cisatracurium (0.15 mg.kg-1) was given to all patients for muscle relaxation. Ultrasound-guided bilateral oblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane (OSTAP) block was performed in all patients. The postoperative quality of recovery at 6 and 24 hours was measured as a primary outcome. Postoperative pain control; subsequent opioid consumption; time to ambulate; time to tolerate oral fluid; and time to readiness for discharge were measured as secondary outcomes Results: The total QoR-40 (quality of recovery-40) scores at 6 hours were significantly higher in the OFA group (184.84 versus 180.69 in the MMA group with an estimated difference in mean of -4.15, 95% CI, -5.78 to -2.5, and P ˂0.001. The OFA group tolerated oral fluid intake earlier (194.94, 95% CI, 162.59 to 227.30) versus (273, 95% CI, 223.65 to 322.27) for the MMA group (p value=0.009). Readiness for discharge was significantly quicker in the OFA group (447.49, 95% CI, 409.69 to 485.29 versus 544.56, 95% CI, 503.08 to 586.04 in the MMA group, P-value =0.001). The post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (0 Hour) and the floor 2 and 6-hour numerical rating scales (NRS) for pain were significantly higher in the MMA group. The OFA group needed less opioid rescue analgesia in the PACU and at 24-hours (P value= 0.003 and 0.014; respectively).Conclusion: Combined Opioid free and loco-regional anesthesia provides better early recovery with reduced postoperative pain intensity, and opioid consumption when compared to multimodal analgesia; and is better suited to achieve the goals of ERAS protocol.Clinical trial number: registration number NCT04285255.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document