scholarly journals Efficacy and feasibility of re-irradiation using carbon ions for pancreatic cancer that recurs after carbon-ion radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 24-29
Author(s):  
Yasuhito Hagiwara ◽  
Shigeru Yamada ◽  
Yuka Isozaki ◽  
Hirotoshi Takiyama ◽  
Makoto Shinoto ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jakob Liermann ◽  
Edgar Ben-Josef ◽  
Mustafa Syed ◽  
Juergen Debus ◽  
Klaus Herfarth ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Data on management of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer (LRPC) after primary resection are limited. Recently, surprisingly high overall survival rates were reported after irradiation with carbon ions. Here, we report on our clinical experience using carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment in LRPC at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Methods Between 2015 and 2019, we treated 13 patients with LRPC with carbon ions with a median total dose of 48 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions using an active raster-scanning technique at a rotating gantry. No concomitant chemotherapy was administered. Overall survival, local control, and toxicity rates were evaluated 18 months after the last patient finished radiotherapy. Results With a median follow-up time of 9.5 months, one patient is still alive (8%). Median OS was 12.7 months. Ten patients (77%) developed distant metastases. Additionally, one local recurrence (8%) and two regional tumor recurrences (15%) were observed. The estimated 1‑year local control and locoregional control rates were 87.5% and 75%, respectively. During radiotherapy, we registered one gastrointestinal bleeding CTCAE grade III (8%) due to gastritis. The bleeding was sufficiently managed with conservative therapy. No further higher-grade acute or late toxicities were observed. Conclusion We demonstrate high local control rates in a rare cohort of LRPC patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. The observed median overall survival rate was not improved compared to historical in-house data using photon radiotherapy. This is likely due to a high rate of distant tumor progression, highlighting the necessity of additional chemotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Yoshiki Kubota ◽  
Masahiko Okamoto ◽  
Shintaro Shiba ◽  
Shohei Okazaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Daily anatomical deviations may distort the dose distribution in carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), which may cause treatment failure. Therefore, this study aimed to perform re-planning to maintain the dose coverage in patients with pancreatic cancer with passive scattering CIRT. Methods Eight patients with pancreatic cancer and 95 daily computed tomography (CT) sets were examined. Two types of adaptive plans based on new range compensators (RCs) (AP-1) and initial RCs (AP-2) were generated. In AP-2, each beam was optimized by manually adjusting the range shifter thickness and spread-out Bragg peak size to make dose reduction by < 3% of the original plan. Doses of the original plan with bone matching (BM) and tumor matching (TM) were examined for comparison. We calculated the accumulated dose using the contour and intensity-based deformable image registration algorithm. The dosimetric differences in respect to the original plan were compared between methods. Results Using TM and BM, mean ± standard deviations of daily CTV V95 (%) difference from the original plan was − 5.1 ± 6.2 and − 8.8 ± 8.8, respectively, but 1.2 ± 3.4 in AP-1 and − 0.5 ± 2.1 in AP-2 (P < 0.001). AP-1 and AP-2 enabled to maintain a satisfactory accumulated dose in all patients. The dose difference was 1.2 ± 2.8, − 2,1 ± 1.7, − 7.1 ± 5.2, and − 16.5 ± 15.0 for AP-1, AP-2, TM, and BM, respectively. However, AP-2 caused a dose increase in the duodenum, especially in the left–right beam. Conclusions The possible dose deterioration should be considered when performing the BM, even TM. Re-planning based on single beam optimization in passive scattering CIRT seems an effective and safe method of ensuring the treatment robustness in pancreatic cancer. Further study is necessary to spare healthy tissues, especially the duodenum.


Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S66
Author(s):  
Yasuhisa Mori ◽  
Takao Ohtsuka ◽  
Kohei Nakata ◽  
Yoshihiro Miyasaka ◽  
Eishi Nagai ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S173
Author(s):  
M. Shinoto ◽  
H. Hirata ◽  
H. Suefuji ◽  
S. Toyama ◽  
M. Ueda

Pancreas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-743
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Malouff ◽  
Sunil Krishnan ◽  
Christopher L. Hallemeier ◽  
Michael G. Haddock ◽  
Bradford S. Hoppe ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shohei Kawashiro ◽  
Shigeru Yamada ◽  
Yuka Isozaki ◽  
Kenji Nemoto ◽  
Hiroshi Tsuji ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
Jakob Liermann ◽  
Makoto Shinoto ◽  
Mustafa Syed ◽  
Jürgen Debus ◽  
Klaus Herfarth ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document