Australian coal mine methane emissions mitigation potential using a Stirling engine-based CHP system

Energy Policy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Aghaei Meybodi ◽  
Masud Behnia
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 473-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxiong Sheng ◽  
Shaojie Song ◽  
Yuzhong Zhang ◽  
Ronald G. Prinn ◽  
Greet Janssens-Maenhout

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (13) ◽  
pp. 2220-2232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Su ◽  
Jiaye Han ◽  
Jinyan Wu ◽  
Hongjun Li ◽  
Rhys Worrall ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Fiehn ◽  
Julian Kostinek ◽  
Maximilian Eckl ◽  
Michal Galkowski ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
...  

<p>Emissions from fossil fuels are one of the primary sources of atmospheric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) growth. However, estimates of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions still show large uncertainties on global and regional scales. Differences in CH<sub>4</sub> isotopic source signatures δ<sup>13</sup>C and δD can help to constrain different source contributions (e.g. fossil, thermogenic, or biogenic).</p><p>The Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) represents one of the largest European CH<sub>4</sub> emission source regions, with more than 500 Gg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>-1</sup> released by more than 50 coal mine ventilation shafts. During the CoMet (Carbon Dioxide and Methane Mission) campaign in June 2018 methane observations were conducted from a variety of platforms including aircraft and cars. Beside the continuous sampling of atmospheric methane concentration, numerous air samples were taken from inside the ventilation shafts, around the ventilation shafts (1‑2 km distance) and aboard the DLR Cessna Caravan aircraft and analyzed in the laboratory for the isotopic composition of CH<sub>4</sub>.</p><p>The ground-based samples allowed determining the source signatures of individual ventilation shafts. These signatures displayed a considerable range between different shafts and also varied from day to day. The airborne samples contained a mixture of methane emissions from several mines and thus enabled accurately determining the signature of the entire region. The mean isotopic signature of methane emissions over the USCB derived from the aircraft samples was -51.9 ± 0.5 ‰ for δ<sup>13</sup>C and -233 ± 6 ‰ for δD. This is in between the range of other microbial and thermogenic coal reservoirs, but more depleted in δD than previous USCB studies reported based on samples taken within the mines. Signatures of methane enhancements sampled upwind of the mines and in the free troposphere clearly showed the presence of methane of biogenic origin (e.g. wetlands, waste, ruminants).</p><p>Furthermore, we simulated the methane isotopologues using the on-line three-times nested global regional chemistry climate model MECO(n). We implemented a submodel extension, which includes the kinetic fractionation and uses the isotopic source signatures determined by the ground-based observations. We compare the regional simulations to flask samples taken during CoMet.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 9079-9096 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Höglund-Isaksson

Abstract. This paper presents estimates of current and future global anthropogenic methane emissions, their technical mitigation potential and associated costs for the period 2005 to 2030. The analysis uses the GAINS model framework to estimate emissions, mitigation potentials and costs for all major sources of anthropogenic methane for 83 countries/regions, which are aggregated to produce global estimates. Global emissions are estimated at 323 Mt methane in 2005, with an expected increase to 414 Mt methane in 2030. The technical mitigation potential is estimated at 195 Mt methane in 2030, whereof about 80 percent is found attainable at a marginal cost less than 20 Euro t−1 CO2eq when using a social planner cost perspective. With a private investor cost perspective, the corresponding fraction is only 30 percent. Major uncertainty sources in emission estimates are identified and discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 11275-11315 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Höglund-Isaksson

Abstract. This paper presents estimates of current and future global anthropogenic methane emissions, their technical mitigation potential and associated costs for the period 2005 to 2030. The analysis uses the GAINS model framework to estimate emissions, mitigation potentials and costs for all major sources of anthropogenic methane for 83 countries/regions, which are aggregated to produce global estimates. Global anthropogenic methane emissions are estimated at 323 Mt methane in 2005, with an expected increase to 414 Mt methane in 2030. Major uncertainty sources in emission estimates are identified and discussed. Mitigation costs are estimated defining two different cost perspectives; the social planner cost perspective and the private investor cost perspective.


1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 283-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol J Bibler ◽  
James S Marshall ◽  
Raymond C Pilcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document