Re: An anatomical and cadaveric study examining the risk of sural nerve injury in percutaneous achilles tendon repair using the Achillon device

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Ken J. Porter ◽  
Amit Amin
2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken J. Porter ◽  
Shibby Robati ◽  
Priyesh Karia ◽  
Mark Portet ◽  
Matthew Szarko ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joverienne Chavez ◽  
Soichi Hattori ◽  
Yuki Kato ◽  
Shuzo Takazawa ◽  
Shin Yamada ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 247301142110600
Author(s):  
Kristin C. Caolo ◽  
Stephanie K. Eble ◽  
Carson Rider ◽  
Andrew J. Elliott ◽  
Constantine A. Demetracopoulos ◽  
...  

Background: There is no current consensus on whether to use an open or minimally invasive (MIS) approach for Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture. We hypothesized that patients in both open and MIS groups would have improved patient-reported outcome scores using the PROMIS system postoperatively, but that there would be minimal differences in these scores and complication rates between operative techniques. Methods: A total of 185 patients who underwent surgery for an acute, unilateral Achilles tendon rupture between January 2016 and June 2019, with minimum 1-year follow-up were included in the cohort studied. The minimally invasive group was defined by use of a commercially available minimally invasive device through a smaller surgical incision (n=118). The open repair group did not use the device, and suture repair was performed through larger surgical incisions (n=67). Postoperative protocols were similar between groups. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores were collected prospectively through our institution’s registry. Demographics and complications were recorded. Results: PROMIS scores overall improved in both study groups after operative repair. No significant differences in postoperative PROMIS scores were observed between the open and MIS repair groups. There were also no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Overall, 19.5% of patients in the MIS group had at least 1 postoperative complication (8.5% deep vein thrombosis [DVT], 3.3% rerupture, 1.7% sural nerve injury, 2.5% infection), compared to 16.4% in the open group (9.0% DVT, 1.5% rerupture, 1.5% sural nerve injury, 0% infection). Conclusion: Patients undergoing either minimally invasive or open Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture have similar PROMIS outcomes and complication types and incidences. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Hsien-Po Chang ◽  
Chueh-Hung Wu ◽  
Levent Özçakar

.


2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Blackmon ◽  
Stavros Atsas ◽  
Mackenzie J. Clarkson ◽  
Jacob N. Fox ◽  
Blake T. Daney ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0022
Author(s):  
Akın Turgut ◽  
Mert Zeynel Asfuroğlu

Objectives: The ruptures of the Achilles tendon (AT) are relatively common. Since there is no consensus on the best method of the repair of the AT; the treatment is determined on the preference of the surgeon and the patient. The study evaluating the cadaveric and short term clinical results done by our clinic in 2002, has shown us that arthroscopically Achilles tendon repair can be good choise in achilles tendon ruptures. Methods: Fortyfour patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted achilles tendon repair during 1997-2011 in Osmangazi University Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department were retrospectively observed. The mean follow-up time was 69,7 months. One of patients had bilateral rupture. The diagnosis was based on loss of plantar flexion strength, palpation of the gap in the tendon, and a positive Thompson test. MRI and USG were used when needed. The ruptures were left-sided in nineteen patients and right-sided in twentysix. The cause of the rupture was recreational sports activity in thirtyeight, fall from height in four, missing a step in a staircase in two. Return the regular activity, ankle range of motion as compared with the opposite side, calf circumference, and ability to walk and stand tiptoe were recorded. All patients were operated on within 2-32 days after the rupture. Thirtysix operations were performed under spinal anesthesia and eight operations were performed under general anesthesia. Tourniquet was always used. Before starting the procedure, the rupture site and location of the gap are marked. Using the common videoarthroscopic instruments, a 70 degrees scope was inserted into the AT through the stab incision made previously, and the torn ends of the tendon were visualized with plantar flexion an extension of the ankle. After the visualization of the torn ends of the tendon and repair by the technique of Ma and Griffith care was focused to contact the ends of the tendon anatomically; then the sutures were knotted. A short leg circular cast with the ankle in slight plantar flexion was applied. American Orthopaedics Foot-Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used to evaluate the long-term results.. Results: All patients had satisfactory results that no reruptures had occurred. No significant difference in range of motion of the ankle and calf circumference between the opposite sides was observed in any patient. All patients could walk and stand on tiptoe. AOFAS mean score was 94.5 (65-100). The interval from injury to return to regular work and activities was 8-10 weeks. All the patients were able to return back to their activity level before surgery. In three patients temporary sural hypoestesia, in one patient permanent sural hipoestesia and in one patient wound enfection appeared. No sensory deficit was detected in the temporary sural hypoestesia patients after postoperative second year controls. Medical care was supported to the patient with the wound enfection and the enfection was under control in the early stages. Conclusion: In summary; arthroscopically-assisted percutaneous repair of AT appears to overcome some certain problems of open, conservative and percutaneous techniques; but the neurovascular structure damage risk especially the sural nerve remains a potent problem. Accurate knowledge of the anatomy appears to be a solution. Novel percutaneous repairs have been promising to minimize the risk of sural nerve damage.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Atsas ◽  
Joseph A Blackmon ◽  
Ferrell R Campbell ◽  
Michael J Wells ◽  
H. Wayne Lambert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document