scholarly journals FERTILITY PRESERVATION MANAGEMENT AND OVARIAN TISSUE CRYOPRESERVATION IN AN INFANT GIRL WITH CLASSIC GALACTOSEMIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e57
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Szymanska ◽  
Alla Vash-Margita ◽  
Kathryn Gunther ◽  
David F. Rodriguez-Buritica ◽  
Kutluk H. Oktay
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Classic Galactosemia ◽  
Infant Girl ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation

Fertility Preservation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantae S Sullivan-Pyke ◽  
Clarisa Gracia
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Testicular Tissue ◽  
Mature Oocyte ◽  
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Oocyte Cryopreservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Embryo Cryopreservation ◽  
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation

Fertility preservation has becoming increasingly important for patients at risk for gonadal failure, including those needing treatment for cancer or autoimmune conditions, genetic conditions that predispose to gonadal insufficiency, and age-related fertility decline. Embryo cryopreservation and mature oocyte cryopreservation are the standards for fertility preservation in postpubertal women. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use for ovarian suppression are experimental methods that may be offered to patients for whom embryo and/or mature oocyte cryopreservation are not applicable. The cryopreservation of spermatozoa is the standard for fertility preservation in postpubertal males, but testicular tissue cryopreservation may be offered to prepubertal males.   This review contains 10 figures, 6 tables and 53 references Key words: controlled ovarian stimulation, embryo cryopreservation, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, in vitro maturation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, sperm extraction, testicular tissue cryopreservation  

scholarly journals Deliveries following fertility preservation by ovarian tissue cryopreservation without autotransplantation—what should be expected?

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lantsberg ◽  
Adel Farhi ◽  
Inna Zaslavsky-Paltiel ◽  
Barbara G. Silverman ◽  
Liat Lerner-Geva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation

P–466 Fertility preservation for medical reasons: International and intra-national variation in provision and the gap between guideline and practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Yasmin ◽  
S Latif ◽  
C Dia. Garcia ◽  
S. Martin. D Silva
Keyword(s):  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
The Uk ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Health Boards

Abstract Study question What is the gap between guidance and practice of fertility preservation between countries and within countries with common clinical guidelines? Summary answer Substantial variation in provision of FP exists between countries and within individual countries with gaps between national and international guidelines and policies governing provision. What is known already A robust guideline on female FP was published by ESHRE in 2020, advising the application of FP in cancer and other conditions where treatment with cytotoxic agents or surgery will compromise reproductive function. Across Europe, in 13 countries (43.3%) FP is funded for all available FP procedures, in 13 countries (43.3%) no FP funding is available, and in 4 countries (13.3%) at least one FP option is funded. Variation in state provision of fertility care in different countries in Europe was highlighted in the ESHRE guidance. It did not specifically examine individual national policies or whether a national policy exists. Study design, size, duration Five clinicians performing FP in Europe were contacted to collect current FP provision data. Policies retrieved from the internet were not included as they could not be verified. Finally, FP funding policies for 135 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England, 14 Health Boards in Scotland, 7 Health Boards in Wales and 5 Trusts in Northern Ireland and 17 policies for regional heath services in Spain were included were included. Participants/materials, setting, methods Policies on FP for the UK and Spain were reviewed (n = 178), including policies from the 161 regions from the four nations of the UK and policies of 17 autonomous bodies in Spain. Information on funded procedures, type of conditions included for funding and duration of storage were extracted. The provision of FP was compared to the current European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Main results and the role of chance In England, 127/128 (99%) CCGs fund cryopreservation of oocytes, sperm and embryos. Cancer is the exclusive indication in 11%. Provision of FP for transgender individuals is specified in 28%, ovarian tissue cryopreservation is funded in 8% and storage funding varies from five to ten years. In Scotland, a national policy is applied. All 14 health boards equitably fund cryopreservation of oocytes, sperm, embryos and ovarian and testicular tissue. Funding is provided for cancer, medical conditions which may impair fertility and transgender individuals. Storage funding is based on a five yearly review until age 43 in women and 60 in men. In Wales and Northern Ireland, cryopreservation of oocytes, sperm and embryos is funded for people undergoing medical or surgical treatment that is likely to make them infertile, provision for transgender individuals is not specified and ovarian tissue cryopreservation is not funded. In Spain, all 17 Health Services fund cryopreservation of oocytes, sperm and embryos for patients whose fertility is at risk due to gonadotoxic treatments or other pathological processes. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is funded in 94%, provision for transgender individuals is specified in 12%, and storage funding is available until the age of 50 in women and 55 in men. Limitations, reasons for caution Inability to retrieve fertility preservation policies for every country in Europe is a limitation, for which ongoing collaboration is sought. The variable nature of FP provision is likely to be multi-factorial; a lag in publication of guidelines and updated policies, ethical considerations and resource distribution may govern health policies. Wider implications of the findings: The study highlights that provision of FP not only varies between countries but is also inconsistent within the same country. It is clear that there is a gap between ideal, evidence-based practice and actual provision. Variation in policies limits uniform access to care for patients. Trial registration number Not applicable.

Review of ovarian tissue cryopreservation techniques for fertility preservation

2021 ◽  
pp. 102290
Author(s):  
Zahra Bahroudi ◽  
Mahsa Rezaei Zarnaghi ◽  
Melika Izadpanah ◽  
Ali Abedelahi ◽  
Behrooz Niknafs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Cryopreservation Techniques ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation

scholarly journals Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Novel Bioengineering Approaches for Fertility Preservation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-360
Author(s):  
Andrea S. K. Jones ◽  
Ariella Shikanov
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation

Fertility Preservation by Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation After Limited Gonadotoxic Chemotherapy in a 10-Year-Old Ewing Sarcoma Patient

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-95
Author(s):  
Ron Peek ◽  
Johan R. Westphal ◽  
Angelique J.C.M. van Dongen ◽  
Jacqueline J. Loonen ◽  
Didi D.M. Braat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Sarcoma Patient

scholarly journals Fertility Preservation in Women With Endometriosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955811987338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia C Llarena ◽  
Tommaso Falcone ◽  
Rebecca L Flyckt
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Careful Selection ◽  
Multiple Levels ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Repeat Procedures

Infertility affects 30% to 50% of women with endometriosis. Women with endometriosis are at risk of decreased ovarian reserve, both because of the pathophysiology of the disease and iatrogenic injury resulting from surgical intervention. Fertility preservation must occur at multiple levels, including careful selection of surgical candidates, avoidance of repeat procedures, and meticulous surgical technique. Fertility preservation with oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation may be considered on an individual basis for women with endometriosis, particularly those at risk of bilateral ovarian injury, such as women with bilateral endometriomas.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: A fertility preservation option for gynecologic oncology patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
E.P. Barnard ◽  
S.R. Steimer ◽  
K.A. Peters ◽  
L.B. Skvarca ◽  
J. Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Tissue Cryopreservation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document