scholarly journals Towards a taxonomy of learning dynamics in 2 × 2 games

2022 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Marco Pangallo ◽  
James B.T. Sanders ◽  
Tobias Galla ◽  
J. Doyne Farmer
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivelisse Lazzarini ◽  
Glenda Eoyang

Author(s):  
Tony Ribeiro ◽  
Maxime Folschette ◽  
Morgan Magnin ◽  
Olivier Roux ◽  
Katsumi Inoue

Author(s):  
David Reynard ◽  
Andrew Wildenberg ◽  
Andrew Blake ◽  
John Marchant

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1861-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. De Lillo ◽  
N. Bellomo

Author(s):  
Sheng Yang ◽  
Lei Guo ◽  
Wensen Yu ◽  
Changyong Liu ◽  
Shimin Meng

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Rahmati ◽  
Saeed Behzadipour ◽  
Alfred C. Schouten ◽  
Ghorban Taghizadeh ◽  
Keikhosrow Firoozbakhsh

Abstract Background: Balance training improves postural control in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, a systematic approach for the development of individualized, optimal training programs is still lacking, as the learning dynamics of the postural control in PD, over a training program are poorly understood. Objectives: We investigated the learning dynamics of the postural control in PD, during a balance-training program, in terms of the clinical, posturographic, and novel model-based measures. Methods: Twenty patients with PD participated in a balance-training program, 3 days a week, for 6 weeks. Clinical tests assessed functional balance and mobility pre-training, mid-training, and post-training. Center-of-pressure (COP) was recorded at four time-points during the training (pre-, week 2, week 4, and post-training). COP was used to calculate the sway measures and to identify the parameters of a patient-specific postural control model, at each time-point. The posturographic and model-based measures constituted the two sets of stability- and flexibility-related measures. Results: Mobility- and flexibility-related measures showed a continuous improvement during the balance-training program. In particular, mobility improved at mid-training and continued to improve to the end of the training, whereas flexibility-related measures reached significance only at the end. The progression in the balance- and stability-related measures was characterized by early improvements over the first three to four weeks of training, and reached a plateau for the rest of the training. Conclusions: The progression in balance and postural stability is achieved earlier and susceptible to plateau out, while mobility and flexibility continues to improve during the balance training.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document