Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer - A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endosonography (EUS) and Fluorine 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. AB199-AB200
Author(s):  
Saowanee Ngamruengphong ◽  
Ananya Das ◽  
Virender K. Sharma
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Carmelo Caldarella ◽  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Maria Antonietta Isgrò ◽  
Ivan Treglia ◽  
Alessandro Giordano

Background and Aim. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is well recognized as a powerful diagnostic tool in the initial staging of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this paper is to perform a systematic review about the usefulness of FDG-PET or PET/CT in evaluating the response to treatment in patients with MM. Methods. The scientific literature about the role of FDG-PET or PET/CT in evaluating the response to treatment in patients affected by MM was systematically reviewed. Results. Ten studies about the role of FDG-PET or PET/CT in evaluating treatment response in MM were retrieved and discussed. Conclusions. FDG-PET or PET/CT seems to be helpful in assessing the response to treatment in patients with MM and in the evaluation of possible sites of recurrent or progressive disease.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (31) ◽  
pp. 4714-4721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arta Monir Monjazeb ◽  
Greg Riedlinger ◽  
Mebea Aklilu ◽  
Kim R. Geisinger ◽  
Girish Mishra ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can delineate patients with esophageal cancer who may not benefit from esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods We reviewed records of 163 patients with histologically confirmed stage I to IVA esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with or without resection with curative intent. All patients received surgical evaluation. Initial and postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET scans and prognostic/treatment variables were analyzed. FDG-PET complete response (PET-CR) after chemoradiotherapy was defined as standardized uptake value ≤ 3. Results Eighty-eight patients received trimodality therapy and 75 received chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was deferred primarily due to medical inoperability or unresectable/metastatic disease after chemoradiotherapy. A total of 105 patients were evaluable for postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET response. Thirty-one percent achieved a PET-CR. PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (2-year overall survival, 71% v 11%, P < .01; 2-year freedom from local failure [LFF], 75% v 28%, P < .01), but not trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, PET-CR is the strongest independent prognostic variable (survival hazard ratio [HR], 9.82, P < .01; LFF HR, 14.13, P < .01). PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes regardless of histology, although patients with adenocarcinoma achieved a PET-CR less often. Conclusion Patients treated with trimodality therapy found no benefit with PET-CR, likely because FDG-PET residual disease was resected. Definitive chemoradiotherapy patients achieving PET-CR had excellent outcomes equivalent to trimodality therapy despite poorer baseline characteristics. Patients who achieve a PET-CR may not benefit from added resection given their excellent outcomes without resection. These results should be validated in a prospective trial of FDG-PET–directed therapy for esophageal cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document