Determinants of Abnormal Activated Clotting Time in Cardiac Catheterisation

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S219
Author(s):  
J. Ramnarain ◽  
H. Rashid ◽  
C. Dowling ◽  
J. Ramzy ◽  
R. Gooley
Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026765912096783
Author(s):  
Sashini Iddawela ◽  
Priti Swamy ◽  
Sajid Member ◽  
Amer Harky

Objective: The systematic review aims to investigate the effect of sampling source on activated clotting time (ACT) measurement within cardiovascular surgery and cardiac catheterisation. It also examines the evidence surrounding novel clot assessment techniques and associated sampling variation. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar until 20th June 2020. All studies reporting sampling source variability of ACT in cardiac surgery, vascular surgery and cardiac catheterisation were included. Results: Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review. Inconsistent reports of variability were seen in cardiac surgery and cardiac catheterisation. There were no studies directly examining ACT variability in vascular surgery. Novel clot assessment techniques have been validated in cardiac surgery, but measurements vary depending on sampling source. Conclusion: Sampling source should be kept consistent to facilitate effective haemostatic strategies. More research is needed regarding variability in vascular surgery and novel clot assessment techniques.


Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972199223
Author(s):  
Jacqueline H. Morris ◽  
Junsoo Alex Lee ◽  
Scott McNitt ◽  
Ilan Goldenberg ◽  
Craig R. Narins

The activated clotting time (ACT) assay is used to monitor and titrate anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Observations at our institution suggested a considerable difference between ACT values drawn from varying arterial sites, prompting the current study. Patients undergoing PCI with unfractionated heparin therapy were prospectively enrolled. Simultaneous arterial blood samples were drawn from the access sheath and the coronary guide catheter. Differences between Hemochron ACT values were determined, and potential interactions with clinical variables were analyzed. Immediately postprocedure, the simultaneous mean guide and sheath ACTs were 327 ± 62 seconds and 257 ± 44 seconds, respectively, with a mean difference of 70 ± 60 seconds (P < .001). Nearly all (90%) ACT values obtained via the guide catheter were higher than the concurrent ACT drawn from the sheath. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lower weight-adjusted heparin doses and absence of diabetes were associated with a greater difference between the ACT values. We conclude that the ACT value is substantially greater when assessed via the guide catheter versus the access sheath. Although the biological mechanisms require further study, this difference should be considered when managing anticoagulation during PCI and when reporting ACT as part of research protocols.


Perfusion ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J Reece ◽  
Gerrard Linley ◽  
Habib Al Tareif ◽  
Rollie DeVroege ◽  
Jitesh Tolia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document