Stigma & dirty work: In-group and out-group perceptions of essential service workers during COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 102772
Author(s):  
Cynthia Mejia ◽  
Rebecca Pittman ◽  
Jenna M.D. Beltramo ◽  
Kristin Horan ◽  
Amanda Grinley ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilith Arevshatian Whiley ◽  
Gina Grandy

PurposeThe authors explore how service workers negotiate emotional laboring with “dirty” emotions while trying to meet the demands of neoliberal healthcare. In doing so, the authors theorize emotional labor in the context of healthcare as a type of embodied and emotional “dirty” work.Design/methodology/approachThe authors apply interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to their data collected from National Health Service (NHS) workers in the United Kingdom (UK).FindingsThe authors’ data show that healthcare service workers absorb, contain and quarantine emotional “dirt”, thereby protecting their organization at a cost to their own well-being. Workers also perform embodied practices to try to absolve themselves of their “dirty” labor.Originality/valueThe authors extend research on emotional “dirty” work and theorize that emotional labor can also be conceptualized as “dirty” work. Further, the authors show that emotionally laboring with “dirty” emotions is an embodied phenomenon, which involves workers absorbing and containing patients' emotional “dirt” to protect the institution (at the expense of their well-being).


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. S. Kristensen ◽  
A. Guichard ◽  
M. Borritz ◽  
E. Villadsen

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwenith G. Fisher ◽  
Kevin M. Walters ◽  
Lauren M. Menger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document