One flap reconstruction of bilateral buccal mucosa and floor of mouth with a radial forearm free flap: “the aviator flap” design

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 515
Author(s):  
R. Fernandes ◽  
A. Cusano ◽  
N. Goldman
Author(s):  
V Monish ◽  
V Jaya ◽  
R Johnsi Rani

This study is aimed to investigate the articulatory functions of patients who have undergone tongue reconstruction following hemiglossectomy. The second aim of the study is to compare the speech intelligibility between hemiglossectomy patients who have undergone tongue reconstruction using pectoralis major myocutaneous with those hemiglossectomy patients who had undergone tongue reconstruction using radial forearm free flap.Fourteen patients who have undergone tongue reconstruction following hemiglossectomy as a treatment for oral cancer between the age of 30 to 60 years were taken up for this study. Tamil Articulation Test was used for assessing the articulatory functions of patients. The speech intelligibility of each patient was assessed using the Ali Yavar Jung National Institute for the Hearing Handicapped intelligibility rating scale. Analysis of articulatory errors revealed linguoalveolar consonants were more impaired when compared to other consonants. Patients with radial forearm free flap had somewhat better speech intelligibility compared to patients with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction.The type of reconstruction also impacts the speech intelligibility. Effective intervention can be planned based on the comprehensive speech evaluation and analysis of articulatory error relative to place and manner of production.


Author(s):  
Patrik Pipkorn ◽  
Jake J. Lee ◽  
Joseph Zenga ◽  
Michael R. Chicoine

Abstract Objectives While most defects after endoscopic endonasal resections can be closed with local or locoregional options, rare cases require free tissue transfer. In this setting, while minimally invasive techniques have been described, the essential procedural details are lacking. The objective of this report is to describe several key technical modifications to free flap harvest and endoscopic-assisted inset which decrease morbidity and improve reliability and efficiency. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive patients treated at Washington University in St. Louis with endoscopic free flap reconstruction through a Caldwell–Luc/transbuccal approach between January 2016 and September 2019. Results A total of six patients underwent adipofascial radial forearm free flap with this technique, five for recalcitrant cerebrospinal fluid leak or pneumocephalus and one for osteoradionecrosis. All flaps survived and there were no flap-related complications. Five patients (83%) achieved successful healing and separation of the sinonasal cavity and intracranial space. One patient developed recurrent pneumocephalus. Three key technical modifications were identified that improve efficiency and reliability of flap delivery and inset: (1) use of an adipofascial radial forearm flap, without skin paddle; (2) wide resection of the anterior and lateral maxillary face to facilitate flap delivery; and (3) precise defect measurement and flap contouring prior to inset to prevent any need to debulk the flap in situ. Conclusion Endoscopic adipofascial radial forearm free flap delivered to the skull base through a Caldwell–Luc/transbuccal corridor is a feasible option with a high success rate and low morbidity when other reconstructive attempts have failed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (7) ◽  
pp. 1157-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricio Andrades ◽  
Stephen F. Pehler ◽  
Christopher F. Baranano ◽  
Jeffery S. Magnuson ◽  
William R. Carroll ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P42-P42
Author(s):  
Grace G. Kim ◽  
Eric G. Halvorson ◽  
Trevor G. Hackman

1995 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. P79-P79
Author(s):  
Gerry F. Funk ◽  
Joseph Valentino

Educational objectives: To identify specific head and neck defects ideally suited for radial forearm flap reconstruction and to better understand and participate in the preoperative workup, intraoperative management, and postoperative care of patients with forearm flaps.


2012 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace G. Kim ◽  
Eric G. Halvorson ◽  
Anna X. Hang ◽  
William C. Pederson ◽  
Giorgio De Santis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document