scholarly journals Implant positioning and patient outcome in orbital reconstruction with patient-specific implants

Author(s):  
R. Schreurs ◽  
L. Dubois ◽  
A.G. Becking ◽  
T.J.J. Maal
2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 1113-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majeed Rana ◽  
Christopher H.K. Chui ◽  
Maximillian Wagner ◽  
Ruediger Zimmerer ◽  
Madiha Rana ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurii Chepurnyi ◽  
Denis Chernogorskyi ◽  
Andrey Kopchak ◽  
Oksana Petrenko

2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752093500
Author(s):  
Daman D. Singh ◽  
Lara Schorn ◽  
E. Bradley Strong ◽  
Michael Grant ◽  
Alexander Schramm ◽  
...  

Study Design: This study presents a case-control study of 33 patients who underwent secondary orbital reconstruction, evaluating techniques and outcome. Objective: Adequate functional and aesthetical appearance are main goals for secondary orbital reconstruction. Insufficient premorbid orbital reconstruction can result in hypoglobus, enophthalmos, and diplopia. Computer-assisted surgery and the use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) is widely described in the literature. The authors evaluate the use of selective laser-melted PSIs and hypothesize that PSIs are an excellent option for secondary orbital reconstruction. Methods: The sample was composed of 33 patients, previously treated with primary orbital reconstruction, presenting themselves with indications for secondary reconstruction (i.e. enophthalmos, diplopia, or limited eye motility). Computed tomography and/or cone beam data sets were assessed before and after secondary reconstruction comparing intraorbital volumes, infraorbital angles, and clinical symptoms. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a standardized protocol. Results: Results show a significant change in intraorbital volumes and a reduction of clinical symptoms after secondary reconstruction. Conclusions: Outcomes of this study suggest that secondary orbital reconstruction can be performed routinely using selective laser-melted PSIs and titanium spacers.


Author(s):  
Leif Ryd ◽  
Katarina Flodström ◽  
Michael Manley

In the quest for increased surgical precision and improved joint kinematics, Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS) shows promising results for both total and partial joint replacement. In the knee, computer-assisted joint design can now be applied to the treatment of younger patients suffering pain and restriction of activity due to focal defects in their femoral articular cartilage. By taking MRI scans of the affected knee and digitally segmenting these scans, we can identify and map focal defects in cartilage and bone. Metallic implants matched to the defect can be fabricated, and guide instrumentation to ensure proper implant alignment and depth of recession in the surrounding cartilage can be designed from segmented MRI scans. Beginning in 2012, a series of 682 patient-specific implants were designed based on MRI analysis of femoral cartilage focal defects, and implanted in 612 knees. A Kaplan-Meier analysis found a cumulative survivorship of 96% at 7-year follow-up from the first implantation. Fourteen (2.3%) of these implants required revision due to disease progression, incorrect implant positioning, and inadequate lesion coverage at the time of surgery. These survivorship data compare favorably with all other modes of treatment for femoral focal cartilage lesions and support the use of patient-specific implants designed from segmented MRI scans in these cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document