Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformation: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 109901
Author(s):  
Ahmad Daneshi ◽  
Mohammad Farhadi ◽  
Mohammad Ajalloueyan ◽  
Mohsen Rajati ◽  
Seyed Basir Hashemi ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke Bruijnzeel ◽  
Fuat Ziylan ◽  
Inge Stegeman ◽  
Vedat Topsakal ◽  
Wilko Grolman

Objective: This review aimed to evaluate the additional benefit of pediatric cochlear implantation before 12 months of age considering improved speech and language development and auditory performance. Materials and Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases and included studies comparing groups with different ages at implantation and assessing speech perception and speech production, receptive language and/or auditory performance. We included studies with a high directness of evidence (DoE). Results: We retrieved 3,360 articles. Ten studies with a high DoE were included. Four articles with medium DoE were discussed in addition. Six studies compared infants implanted before 12 months with children implanted between 12 and 24 months. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 9 years. Cochlear implantation before the age of 2 years is beneficial according to one speech perception score (phonetically balanced kindergarten combined with consonant-nucleus-consonant) but not on Glendonald auditory screening procedure scores. Implantation before 12 months resulted in better speech production (diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology and infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale), auditory performance (Categories of Auditory Performance-II score) and receptive language scores (2 out of 5; Preschool Language Scale combined with oral and written language skills and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test). Conclusions: The current best evidence lacks level 1 evidence studies and consists mainly of cohort studies with a moderate to high risk of bias. Included studies showed consistent evidence that cochlear implantation should be performed early in life, but evidence is inconsistent on all speech and language outcome measures regarding the additional benefit of implantation before the age of 12 months. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to provide insight on additional benefits of early pediatric cochlear implantation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 1300-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsunori Ishida ◽  
Makoto Sakai ◽  
Masahiro Iida ◽  
Masahiro Takahashi ◽  
Akira Naito ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Guderian ◽  
B Trier ◽  
S Helbig ◽  
S Kramer ◽  
T Stöver ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Shujiro B. Minami ◽  
Nobuko Yamamoto ◽  
Makoto Hosoya ◽  
Chieko Enomoto ◽  
Hidetoshi Kato ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sok Yan Tay ◽  
Rosslyn Anicete ◽  
Kun Kiaang Henry Tan

Objectives. To evaluate children with inner ear malformations following cochlear implantation (CI) in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Singapore to identify factors influencing outcomes after CI. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study of children aged 0 to 18 years, who had CI between 2000 and 2013. Demographic information, data on risk factors, type of inner ear malformation (IEM), age at implantation, speech pre- and postimplantation, and duration of follow-up were collected from clinical records. Operative details and audiological outcomes were also analyzed. Results. A total of 70 children underwent 83 CI surgeries. The mean age of the patients was 4.05 ± 3.17 years (range 1–18 years). Twenty patients (28.57%) had abnormal CT scan findings. CSF gusher occurred in 15 out of 26 CI (57.69%) in the group with IEM. Nine out of twenty patients (45.00%) had poor IT-MAIS scores prior to implantation. The average preoperative IT-MAIS score for children with anomalous inner ear anatomy was 14.1. The older CI patients, 3/20 (15.00%), mean age 8.33 years (range 7–10 years), were mostly referred for persistently unclear speech following hearing aids. Eleven patients (55.00%) had good speech and aided hearing threshold within speech limits after CI and were eligible for reintegration into mainstream schools. Five patients (25.00%) had improvement in speech but continued to receive education in special schools. Four patients (20.00%) had poor progress after surgery. Conclusion. The presence of absent cochlear nerve, electrode folding, and underlying neurological disorders seemed to be associated with poorer outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document