A Phantom Evaluation of Contralateral Breast Dose for Whole Breast Irradiation Techniques

Author(s):  
T.M. Williams ◽  
J. Moran ◽  
S. Hsu ◽  
I. Gallagher ◽  
S. Henshaw ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Richter ◽  
Sonja Wegener ◽  
Kathrin Breuer ◽  
Gary Razinskas ◽  
Stefan Weick ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To develop a tangential treatment technique for whole breast irradiation using the Varian Halcyon and to compare it with Elekta Synergy Agility plans.Methods: For 20 patients two comparable treatment plans with respect to dose coverage and normal tissue sparing were generated. Tangential field-in-field treatment plans (Pinnacle/Synergy) were replanned using the sliding window technique (Eclipse/Halcyon). Plan specific QA was performed using the portal Dosimetry and the ArcCHECK phantom. Imaging and treatment dose were evaluated for treatment delivery on both systems using a modified CIRS Phantom.Results: The mean number of monitor units for a fraction dose of 2.67 Gy was 515 MUs and 260 MUs for Halcyon and Synergy Agility plans, respectively. The homogeneity index and dose coverage were similar for both treatment units. The plan specific QA showed good agreement between measured and calculated plans. All Halcyon plans passed portal dosimetry QA (3%/2 mm) with 100% points passing and ArcCheck QA (3%/2 mm) with 99.5%. Measurement of the treatment and imaging dose with the CIRS phantom resulted in lower dose to the contralateral breast for the Halcyon plans.Conclusions: For the Varian Halcyon a plan quality similar to the Elekta Synergy device was achieved. For the Halcyon plans the dose contribution from the treatment fields to the contralateral breast was even lower due to less interleaf transmission of the Halcyon MLC and a contribution of scattered dose from the collimator system.


2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2079-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence M. Williams ◽  
Jean M. Moran ◽  
Shu-Hui Hsu ◽  
Robin Marsh ◽  
Beth Yanke ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiling Dai ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
Lan Li ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Yaoxiong Xia ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposePostoperative radiotherapy can reduce the recurrence of breast cancer. Postoperative radiotherapy is divided into whole breast irradiation (WBI) and partial breast irradiation (PBI) for early breast cancers. Due to the characters of saving time, money, and easy to deliver, external beams PBI (EB PBI) is brought into focus. However, the researches on outcomes, safety, and efficacy between EB PBI and WBI are still insufficient. We concluded a meta-analysis for LRR, regional node recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, distant recurrence, mortality, less acute skin toxicity (˃ 1 grade), late skin toxicity and the cosmetic score of external beam partial breast irradiation (EB PBI) and whole breast irradiation(WBI) to develop a radiotherapy plan for early low recurrence risk breast cancer patients. MethodWe searched Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Clinicaltrals. Study eligibility criteria are as below: (1) RCTs for EB PBI vs WBI; (2) Histologically confirmed breast cancer; (3) AJCC staged Tis-2N0-1M0; (4) ≥ 40 years old; (5) Tumor size ≤ 3 cm;(6) microscopically clear margins ≤ 5 cm; (7) Mean follow-up time༞5 years. All data is used by Cochrane’s Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan) to process.ResultsThere were 4 RCT studies included in our study with 1999 patients in EB PBI group and 1999 patients in EB PBI. There was no statistic difference between PBI and WBI groups in local recurrence rates (RR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.74; p = 0.52; I2 = 0%), regional node recurrence(RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.49 to 2.04, p = 0.99, I2 = 0%), contralateral breast cancer (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.16; p = 0.23; I2 = 0%), distant recurrence(RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.59; p = 1.00; I2 = 0%), non-breast second cancer (RR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.16; p = 0.93; I2 = 83%), mortality(RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.55; p = 0.88, I2 = 54%). EB PBI had worse cosmetic score (RR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.34; p = 0.003, I2 = 84%), less acute skin toxicity (˃ 1 grade) (RR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.42; p༜ 0.0001, I2 = 87%) and late skin toxicity(RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.88; p = 0.005; I2 = 27%) than WBI.ConclusionEB PBI has similar LRR, regional node recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, distant recurrence, non-breast second cancer and mortality with WBI. But EB PBI has worse cosmetic score, less acute skin toxicity (˃ 1 grade) and late skin toxicity than WBI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Richter ◽  
Sonja Wegener ◽  
Kathrin Breuer ◽  
Gary Razinskas ◽  
Stefan Weick ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To implement a tangential treatment technique for whole breast irradiation using the Varian Halcyon and to compare it with Elekta Synergy Agility plans. Methods For 20 patients two comparable treatment plans with respect to dose coverage and normal tissue sparing were generated. Tangential field-in-field treatment plans (Pinnacle/Synergy) were replanned using the sliding window technique (Eclipse/Halcyon). Plan specific QA was performed using the portal Dosimetry and the ArcCHECK phantom. Imaging and treatment dose were evaluated for treatment delivery on both systems using a modified CIRS Phantom. Results The mean number of monitor units for a fraction dose of 2.67 Gy was 515 MUs and 260 MUs for Halcyon and Synergy Agility plans, respectively. The homogeneity index and dose coverage were similar for both treatment units. The plan specific QA showed good agreement between measured and calculated plans. All Halcyon plans passed portal dosimetry QA (3%/2 mm) with 100% points passing and ArcCheck QA (3%/2 mm) with 99.5%. Measurement of the cumulated treatment and imaging dose with the CIRS phantom resulted in lower dose to the contralateral breast for the Halcyon plans. Conclusions For the Varian Halcyon a plan quality similar to the Elekta Synergy device was achieved. For the Halcyon plans the dose contribution from the treatment fields to the contralateral breast was even lower due to less interleaf transmission of the Halcyon MLC and a lower contribution of scattered dose from the collimator system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document