scholarly journals TCT-18 Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With and Without Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture

2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (19) ◽  
pp. B9
Author(s):  
Christina Brinkmann. ◽  
Joachim Schofer
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-321
Author(s):  
Mohanad Hamandi ◽  
Ikenna Nwafor ◽  
Katherine R. Hebeler ◽  
Alexander Crawford ◽  
Allison T. Lanfear ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. S. Kokov ◽  
V. V. Sokolov ◽  
M. V. Parkhomenko ◽  
R. Sh. Muslimov ◽  
M. V. Bulanova ◽  
...  

Introduction. We present the clinical observation of a 72-year-old female patient with high surgical risk and structural degeneration of a bioprosthetic aortic valve (AV) cusps in the form of stenosis, accompanied by severe dysfunction. Transcatheter implantation of bioprosthesis Medtronic CoreValve™ Evolut™ R-23 was performed using the valve-in-valve technique. The choice of minimally invasive treatment tactics is substantiated, a preoperative examination algorithm and a specific bioprosthesis model for such intervention are provided. Materials and methods. Imaging – echocardiography (Echo), electrocardiography, multispiral computed tomography, coronary angiography. Bioprosthetic valve calcification and stenosis with critical parameters of the bioprosthetic AV peak pressure gradient according to Echo data were the indications for minimally invasive surgery. Results. Dynamic observation revealed a progressive deterioration in the function of the previously implanted bioprosthetic heart valve in the aortic position, and a critical deterioration in the patient’s condition. After additional examination of the patient and selection of a new prosthesis, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement was done. The positive dynamics of the general state of the patient was noted in the early postoperative period. Echo data showed that the bioprosthetic AV peak systolic pressure gradient decreased from 90 to 29 mmHg, average gradient – from 42 to 19 mmHg. Conclusion. The minimally invasive valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement used to correct the dysfunction of a bioprosthetic AV that was previously implanted during an open surgery was shown to be safe and effective and can be considered as one of the options for repeat valve replacement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document