Wine consumption in Bronze Age Italy: combining organic residue analysis, botanical data and ceramic variability

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 105256
Author(s):  
Alessandra Pecci ◽  
Elisabetta Borgna ◽  
Simona Mileto ◽  
Elisa Dalla Longa ◽  
Giovanna Bosi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Koh ◽  
Kathleen Birney

Often treated as an accessory science, organic residue analysis (ORA) has the capacity to illuminate otherwise hidden aspects of ancient technology, culture, and economy, and therein can play a central role in archaeological inquiry. Through ORA, both the intact vessel freshly excavated from a tomb and the sherd tucked away in a museum storage closet can offer insights into their contents, their histories, and the cultures that created them—provided the results can be carefully calibrated to account for their treatment during and after excavation. The case study below presents ORA data obtained from a range of artifacts from Late Bronze Age Crete, setting results from freshly-excavated and legacy objects alongside one another. Although legacy objects do tend to yield diminished results from both a quantitative and qualitative perspective, our comparative work has demonstrated both their value and untapped potential when their object biographies are carefully considered. It also sheds light on biomarker degradation processes, which have implications for methodologies of extraction and interpretation of legacy objects. Comparative studies such as these broaden the pool of viable ORA candidates, and therein amplify ORA’s ability to reveal patterns of consumption as well as ecological and environmental change. They also highlight the role and value of data-sharing in collaborative environments such as the OpenARCHEM archaeometric database.


2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (XIV) ◽  
pp. 13-44
Author(s):  
Curt W. Beck ◽  
Edith C. Stout ◽  
Karen M. Wovkulich ◽  
Vassos Karageorghis ◽  
Eleni Aloupi

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dunne ◽  
E. Biddulph ◽  
P. Manix ◽  
T. Gillard ◽  
H. Whelton ◽  
...  

AbstractFood is often one of the most distinctive expressions of social, religious, cultural or ethnic groups. However, the archaeological identification of specific religious dietary practices, including the Jewish tradition of keeping kosher, associated with ritual food practices and taboos, is very rare. This is arguably one of the oldest known diets across the world and, for an observant Jew, maintaining dietary laws (known as Kashruth) is a fundamental part of everyday life. Recent excavations in the early medieval Oxford Jewish quarter yielded a remarkable assemblage of animal bones, marked by a complete absence of pig specimens and a dominance of kosher (permitted) birds, domestic fowl and goose. To our knowledge, this is the first identification of a Jewish dietary signature in British zooarchaeology, which contrasted markedly with the previous Saxon phase where pig bones were present in quantity and bird bones were barely seen. Lipid residue analysis of pottery from St Aldates showed that vessels from the possible Jewish houses were solely used to process ruminant carcass products, with an avoidance of pig product processing, correlating well with the faunal data. In contrast, lipid analysis of pottery from comparative assemblages from the previous Saxon phase at the site and a contemporaneous site in the city, The Queen’s College, shows that the majority of these vessels appear to have been used to process mixtures of both ruminant and non-ruminant (pig) products. Here, the combination of organic residue analysis, site excavation and animal and fish bone evidence was consistent with the presence of Jewish houses in eleventh- and twelfth-century St Aldates, Oxford, hitherto only suspected through documentary information. This is the first identification of specific religious dietary practices using lipid residue analysis, verifying that, at least 800 years ago, medieval Jewish Oxford communities practised dietary laws known as Kashruth.


2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Barnard ◽  
S.H. Ambrose ◽  
D.E. Beehr ◽  
M.D. Forster ◽  
R.E. Lanehart ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard P. Evershed ◽  
Mélanie Roffet-Salque

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document