Bottom-up estimation of joint moments during manual lifting using orientation sensors instead of position sensors

Objective: The main objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of bottom-up solution for three-dimensional (3D) inverse dynamics analysis of squat lifting using a 3D full body linked segment model. Least squares solution was used in this study as reference for assessment of the accuracy of bottom-up solution. Findings of this study may clarify how much the bottom-up solution can be reliable for calculating the joint kinetics in 3D inverse dynamics problems. Methods: Ten healthy males volunteered to perform squat lifting of a box with a load of one-tenth of their body weights. The joint moments were calculated using 110 reflective passive markers (46 anatomical markers and 64 tracking markers) and a 3D full body linked segment model. Ground reaction forces and kinematics data were recorded using a Vicon system with two parallel Kistler force plates. Three-dimensional Newton–Euler equations of motion with bottom-up and least squares solutions were applied to calculate joint moments. The peak and mean values of the joint moments were determined to check the quantitative differences as well as the time-to-peak value of the moment curves was determined to check the temporal differences between the two inverse dynamics solutions. Results: Significant differences (all [Formula: see text]-values [Formula: see text]) between the two inverse dynamics solutions were detected for the peak values of the hip (right and left sides) and L5–S1 joint moments in the lateral anatomical direction as well significant differences (all [Formula: see text]-values [Formula: see text]) were detected for the peak and mean values of the L5–S1 joint moment in all anatomical directions. Moreover, small differences (all RMSEs [Formula: see text]%) were detected between the two inverse dynamic solutions for the calculated lower body joint moments. Conclusions: The findings of this study clarified the disadvantages of the straightforward solutions and demonstrated that the bottom-up solution may not be accurate for more distal measures from the force plate (for hip and S1–L5) but it may be accurate for more proximal joints (ankle and knee) in 3D inverse dynamics analysis.

Download Full-text

Optimal Estimation of Anthropometric Parameters for Quantifying Multisegment Trunk Kinetics

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering ◽

10.1115/1.4040247 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 140 (10) ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Alireza Noamani ◽

Albert H. Vette ◽

Richard Preuss ◽

Milos R. Popovic ◽

Hossein Rouhani

Keyword(s):

Inverse Dynamics ◽

Center Of Pressure ◽

Initial Guess ◽

Joint Moment ◽

Body Motion ◽

Top Down ◽

Joint Moments ◽

Anthropometric Parameters ◽

Bottom Up ◽

The Difference

Kinetics assessment of the human head-arms-trunk (HAT) complex via a multisegment model is a useful tool for objective clinical evaluation of several pathological conditions. Inaccuracies in body segment parameters (BSPs) are a major source of uncertainty in the estimation of the joint moments associated with the multisegment HAT. Given the large intersubject variability, there is currently no comprehensive database for the estimation of BSPs for the HAT. We propose a nonlinear, multistep, optimization-based, noninvasive method for estimating individual-specific BSPs and calculating joint moments in a multisegment HAT model. Eleven nondisabled individuals participated in a trunk-bending experiment and their body motion was recorded using cameras and a force plate. A seven-segment model of the HAT was reconstructed for each participant. An initial guess of the BSPs was obtained by individual-specific scaling of the BSPs calculated from the male visible human (MVH) images. The intersegmental moments were calculated using both bottom-up and top-down inverse dynamics approaches. Our proposed method adjusted the scaled BSPs and center of pressure (COP) offsets to estimate optimal individual-specific BSPs that minimize the difference between the moments obtained by top-down and bottom-up inverse dynamics approaches. Our results indicate that the proposed method reduced the error in the net joint moment estimation (defined as the difference between the net joint moment calculated via bottom-up and top-down approaches) by 79.3% (median among participants). Our proposed method enables an optimized estimation of individual-specific BSPs and, consequently, a less erroneous assessment of the three-dimensional (3D) kinetics of a multisegment HAT model.

Download Full-text

COMPARING METHODS FOR 3D INVERSE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF SQUAT LIFTING USING A FULL BODY LINKED SEGMENT MODEL

Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology ◽

10.1142/s0219519420310016 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 2031001

Author(s):

IMAN VAHDAT ◽

MOHAMAD PARNIANPOUR ◽

FARHAD TABATABAI GHOMSHEH ◽

NIMA TOOSIZADEH ◽

ALI TANBAKOOSAZ

Keyword(s):

Inverse Dynamics ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Dynamics Analysis ◽

Joint Moments ◽

Bottom Up ◽

Mean Values ◽

Segment Model ◽

Squat Lifting ◽

Inverse Dynamics Analysis ◽

Full Body

Objective: The main objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of bottom-up solution for three-dimensional (3D) inverse dynamics analysis of squat lifting using a 3D full body linked segment model. Least squares solution was used in this study as reference for assessment of the accuracy of bottom-up solution. Findings of this study may clarify how much the bottom-up solution can be reliable for calculating the joint kinetics in 3D inverse dynamics problems. Methods: Ten healthy males volunteered to perform squat lifting of a box with a load of one-tenth of their body weights. The joint moments were calculated using 110 reflective passive markers (46 anatomical markers and 64 tracking markers) and a 3D full body linked segment model. Ground reaction forces and kinematics data were recorded using a Vicon system with two parallel Kistler force plates. Three-dimensional Newton–Euler equations of motion with bottom-up and least squares solutions were applied to calculate joint moments. The peak and mean values of the joint moments were determined to check the quantitative differences as well as the time-to-peak value of the moment curves was determined to check the temporal differences between the two inverse dynamics solutions. Results: Significant differences (all [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]) between the two inverse dynamics solutions were detected for the peak values of the hip (right and left sides) and L5–S1 joint moments in the lateral anatomical direction as well significant differences (all [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]) were detected for the peak and mean values of the L5–S1 joint moment in all anatomical directions. Moreover, small differences (all [Formula: see text]) were detected between the two inverse dynamic solutions for the calculated lower body joint moments. Conclusions: The findings of this study clarified the disadvantages of the straightforward solutions and demonstrated that the bottom-up solution may not be accurate for more distal measures from the force plate (for hip and S1–L5) but it may be accurate for more proximal joints (ankle and knee) in 3D inverse dynamics analysis.

Download Full-text