The association between gird and overhead throwing biomechanics in cricket

2021 ◽  
pp. 110658
Author(s):  
Megan Dutton ◽  
Nicholas Tam ◽  
Nikhil Divekar ◽  
Danielle Prins ◽  
Janine Gray
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1259-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire H. Stapleton ◽  
Jade Elias ◽  
Danny J. Green ◽  
N. Tim Cable ◽  
Keith P. George

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 091-091
Author(s):  
Hugue Ouellette ◽  
Ara Kassarjian ◽  
Patrice Tétreault ◽  
William Palmer

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin E. Wilk ◽  
Keith Meister ◽  
Glenn Fleisig ◽  
James R. Andrews

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Dugas ◽  
Christopher A. Looze ◽  
Christopher Michael Jones ◽  
Brian L. Walters ◽  
Marcus A. Rothermich ◽  
...  

Objectives: There has been a renewed interest in UCL repair in overhead athletes. This is largely due to greater understanding of UCL pathology, improvement in fixation technology and the extensive rehab required to return from UCL reconstruction. Initial data regarding UCL repair in overhead athletes was poor and therefore UCL repair was largely abandoned in favor of reconstruction. However, recent literature examining UCL repair with anchor only fixation demonstrated an excellent rate of return to play, reduced time to return to play and a low complication rate. Based on this promising data, we have developed a novel technique of UCL repair with internal brace augmentation that we have used in overhead throwing athletes. We performed a prospective study evaluating the outcomes of this procedure with respect to return to play, time to return to play, functional outcome score and complications. Methods: Overhead athletes undergoing UCL repair with internal brace augmentation were prospectively followed for a minimum of one year. Patients were carefully selected from those who would traditionally be considered for UCL reconstruction. Initially, patients were considered if they had an avulsion of the UCL with otherwise healthy UCL tissue and had a vested interest in shortened rehab. As the study progressed, interest in shortened rehab became a less stringent criteria. Demographic and operative data were collected at the time surgery. This data was compiled for both desciption and comparison between subgroups. Patients were then contacted 1 year postoperatively and assessed for return to play, time to return to play and KJOC scores. Complications were documented and patients having complications were detailed. Results: 66 overhead athletes underwent UCL repair with internal brace augmentation during the study period. 8 were lost to follow up, leaving 58 athletes included in the study. Average age at the time of surgery was 17.9 years old. There were 43 baseball pitchers, 8 baseball position players, 4 softball players, 2 football quaterbacks, and 1 javelin thrower. 96% (54/56) of those who desired to return to the same or higher level of competition were able to do so at an average time of 6.1 months (range 3.2-12 months). 65% of these were able to return in less than 6 months. Many of those who took longer than 6 months did so due to timing within the season. Average KJOC score was 90.2 at 1-year follow-up. 3 patients required return to the operating room, 2 of which were eventually able to return to their previous level of play. There was 1 late failure over 3 years from the index procedure. Comparative subgroup data is presented in table 1. Conclusion: UCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a viable option for overhead throwers with selected UCL pathology who wish to return to sport in a shorter time frame than allowed by traditional UCL reconstruction. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e1429-e1431
Author(s):  
Vincent A. Lizzio ◽  
Austin G. Cross ◽  
Eric W. Guo ◽  
Eric C. Makhni

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-226
Author(s):  
Jason L. Zaremski ◽  
Giorgio Zeppieri ◽  
Brady L. Tripp

Author(s):  
Justin W. Griffin ◽  
John D. Higgins ◽  
Timothy S. Leroux ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57
Author(s):  
Felipe Ribeiro Pereira ◽  
Gabriela G. Pavan Gonçalves ◽  
Deborah Rocha Reis ◽  
Izabel C. P Rohlfs ◽  
Luciana De Michelis Mendonça ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction: Overhead-throwing athletes undergo changes in shoulder range of motion (ROM) due to sports activities, such as excessive amplitude, lateral rotation (LR) increase and medial rotation (MR) restriction. Asymmetry greater than 20° may render athletes more prone to injuries. There are similarities among sports featuring overhead throwing due to the considerable amount of movements involving maximum lateral rotation. In these sports, medial rotation (MR) restriction, excess of lateral rotation (LR) and shoulder pain are common, particularly in overhead-throwing athletes. Objective: To assess shoulder MR and LR ROM in athletes participating in different sports, considering the influence of these variables on injuries and functional performance. Methods: The rotation ROM of the glenohumeral joint was assessed in 477 young athletes, who were categorized in three sports groups: swimming, overhead-throwing and non-overhead throwing, distributed by age group. Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) were performed to verify if there were differences in MR and LR between groups and paired Student t test was used to verify differences between sides (asymmetry). Results: Youngest athletes showed significant shorter LR than the oldest, in both sides. This study demonstrated that the right side has less MR and greater LR in all groups. Conclusion: The findings showed that overhead-throwing and swimming groups have similarities in shoulder rotation ROM. Level of evidence III; Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document