scholarly journals Testing for risk aversion in first-price sealed-bid auctions

Author(s):  
Sung Jae Jun ◽  
Federico Zincenko
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Engelbrecht-Wiggans ◽  
Elena Katok

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 631-647
Author(s):  
Sascha Füllbrunn ◽  
Dirk-Jan Janssen ◽  
Utz Weitzel

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G Riley

The first objective of this paper has been to explain why it is that expected seller revenue is the same under very different auction rules. The second objective has been to explain why revenue equivalence no longer holds once the central assumptions of risk aversion and independence of beliefs are modified. The effect of risk aversion is to make a sealed high bid auction more attractive from a seller's viewpoint. The effect of correlated beliefs is to favor open bidding. Which of the two factors dominates under plausible assumptions about risk aversion parameters and about the degree to which beliefs are correlated remains an important open question.


1987 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Walker ◽  
Vernon L. Smith ◽  
James C. Cox

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ejaz ◽  
Stephen Joe ◽  
Chaitanya Joshi

In this paper, we use the adversarial risk analysis (ARA) methodology to model first-price sealed-bid auctions under quite realistic assumptions. We extend prior work to find ARA solutions for mirror equilibrium and Bayes Nash equilibrium solution concepts, not only for risk-neutral but also for risk-averse and risk-seeking bidders. We also consider bidders having different wealth and assume that the auctioned item has a reserve price.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document