scholarly journals Tail risk in hedge funds: A unique view from portfolio holdings

2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 610-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Agarwal ◽  
Stefan Ruenzi ◽  
Florian Weigert
Author(s):  
Vikas Agarwal ◽  
Stefan Ruenzi ◽  
Florian Weigert

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-237
Author(s):  
Jung‐Soon Shin ◽  
Minki Kim ◽  
Dongjun Oh ◽  
Tong Suk Kim
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 1550004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. George ◽  
Chuan-Yang Hwang

We examine voluntary and mandated disclosure of portfolio holdings by investment funds in a model where funds are characterized as having a stream of investment ideas and as providing liquidity to investors through redemption. We show that the greater is the fund's liquidity provision role, the more aggressively the fund trades on its ideas, the stronger is its preference to disclose information about its holdings voluntarily, and the weaker is its performance. We also show that mandatory disclosure can decrease information available in securities markets by crowding out the acquisition of private information that, through funds' trading, would be reflected in prices. Our model provides an explanation for why hedge funds and mutual funds differ in their resistance to public disclosure, and is consistent with stylized facts regarding how funds' investment decisions respond to poor performance and how differences in disclosure policies affect the future performance of well versus poorly performing funds.


Author(s):  
Monica Billio ◽  
Kaleab Y. Mamo ◽  
Loriana Pelizzon

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caio Almeida ◽  
Marcelo Fernandes ◽  
Joao Paulo Valente
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 797-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Hodder ◽  
Jens Carsten Jackwerth ◽  
Olga Kolokolova

AbstractNumerous hedge funds stop reporting each year to commercial databases, wreaking havoc with analyzing investment strategies that incur the unobserved delisting return. We use estimated portfolio holdings for funds-of-funds to back out estimated hedge-fund delisting returns. For all exiting funds, the estimated mean delisting return is insignificantly different from the average monthly return for live hedge funds. However, funds with poor prior performance and no clearly stated delisting reason had a significantly negative estimated mean delisting return of -5.97%, suggesting that a shock to their returns “tips them over the edge” and leads to delisting.


Author(s):  
Guillaume Weisang

Risk measurement and management is an important and complex subject for hedge fund stakeholders, managers, and investors. Given that hedge funds dynamically trade a wide range of financial instruments, their returns show tail risk and nonlinear characteristics with respect to many financial markets that require advanced downside risk measures, such as value-at-risk, expected shortfall, and tail risk, to capture risk adequately. This chapter reviews the nature of these risks and presents the measurement tools needed, focusing on fixed-income instruments, derivative securities, and equity risk measurement, and stressing the importance of frequent assessment to capture the possibly rapidly changing risk profiles of hedge funds. This chapter also provides an overview of the linear factor models that investors often use to measure hedge fund risk exposures along many risk factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document