Perioperative opioid use and Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah E. Henry ◽  
Tina Zhang ◽  
Ali Aneizi ◽  
Tristan B. Weir ◽  
Matheus B. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Scores ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Perioperative Opioid Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Aneizi ◽  
Elizabeth Friedmann ◽  
Leah E. Henry ◽  
Gregory Perraut ◽  
Patrick M. J. Sajak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most commonly performed outpatient orthopaedic procedures, yet there is little data about perioperative opioid prescribing practices. The purposes of this study were to quantify the perioperative opioid prescriptions filled by patients who underwent ACLR and to identify factors associated with greater postoperative opioid use. Patients who underwent ACLR at a single institution between June 2015 and May 2017 were studied using a regional prescription monitoring database to identify all preoperative and postoperative outpatient opioid prescriptions up to 2 years postoperatively. The number of morphine milligram equivalents of each opioid was calculated to determine total morphine milligram equivalents (TMEs) filled preoperatively, at discharge, and refilled postoperatively. Patients who refilled an opioid prescription postoperatively were compared with those who did not. Ninety-nine of 269 (36.8%) total patients refilled an opioid prescription postoperatively. Thirty-three patients (12.3%) required a refill after 2 weeks postoperatively, and no patients refilled after 21 months postoperatively. Fifty-seven patients (21%) received an opioid prescription in the 2 years following surgery that was unrelated to their ACL reconstruction. Increased age, higher body mass index (BMI), government insurance, current or prior tobacco use history, preoperative opioid use, and greater number of medical comorbidities were significantly associated with refilling a prescription opioid. Higher BMI and government insurance were independent predictors of refilling. Higher preoperative TMEs and surgeon were independent predictor of greater refill TMEs. In the opioid-naïve subgroup of 177 patients, only higher BMI was a predictor of refilling, and only greater comorbidities was a predictor of greater refill TMEs. The results demonstrate that preoperative opioid use was associated with postoperative opioid refills and higher refill TMEs in a dose-dependent fashion. A higher percentage of patients received an opioid prescription for reasons unrelated to the ACL reconstruction than refilled a prescription after the first 2 weeks postoperatively.

Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Programs Administered over 2 Different Time Intervals

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce D. Beynnon ◽  
Benjamin S. Uh ◽  
Robert J. Johnson ◽  
Joseph A. Abate ◽  
Claude E. Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background There are adverse effects associated with immobilization of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, yet very little is known about how much activity will promote adequate rehabilitation without permanently elongating the graft, producing graft failure, or creating damage to articular cartilage. Hypothesis Rehabilitation with either an accelerated or nonaccelerated program produces no difference in anterior-posterior knee laxity, clinical assessment, patient satisfaction, functional performance, and the synovial fluid biomarkers of articular cartilage metabolism. Study Design Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods Twenty-five patients who tore their anterior cruciate ligament were enrolled and underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients were randomized to accelerated rehabilitation or nonaccelerated rehabilitation. At the time of surgery and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months later, measurements of anterior-posterior knee laxity, clinical assessment, patient satisfaction, functional performance, and cartilage metabolism were completed. Results At the 2-year follow-up, there was no difference in the increase of anterior knee laxity relative to the baseline values that were obtained immediately after surgery between the 2 groups (2.2-mm vs 1.8-mm increase relative to the normal knee). The groups were similar in terms of clinical assessment, patient satisfaction, activity level, function, and response of the bio-markers. After 1 year of healing, synthesis of collagen and turnover of aggrecan remained elevated in both groups. Conclusion Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft followed by either accelerated or nonaccelerated rehabilitation produces the same increase of anterior knee laxity. Both programs had the same effect in terms of clinical assessment, patient satisfaction, functional performance, and the biomarkers of articular cartilage metabolism. There is concern that the cartilage biomarkers remained elevated for an extended period.

scholarly journals Preoperative Factors Associated with Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Scores after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory T. Perraut ◽  
Tina Zhang ◽  
Tristan B. Weir ◽  
Matheus B. Schneider ◽  
Ali Aneizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Preoperative Factors ◽  
Domain Scores

AbstractPatient satisfaction is increasingly used as a metric to evaluate the quality of healthcare services and to determine hospital and physician compensation. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) satisfaction scores, and to evaluate the effect of each PGAS domain score on the total PGAS score variability in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A review of a Press Ganey (PG) database at a single center was performed for patients undergoing ACLR between 2015 and 2019. Ninety-nine patients completed the PGAS survey and 54 also completed preoperative demographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for an orthopaedic registry. PGAS scores were calculated and bivariate analysis was performed. Multivariable linear regression determined the effect of each of the six PGAS domains on the total PGAS score variability. In the total cohort of 99 patients, no factors were significantly associated with the total PGAS score or any domain scores. For the 54 patients who also participated in the orthopaedic registry, none of the preoperative PROMs were significantly correlated with total PGAS score. However, having a college degree (89 vs. 95 or 97 points; p = 0.02) and continuous femoral nerve catheter (92 vs. 100 points; p = 0.04) was associated with lower personal issue domain scores, while patients with a greater number of prior surgeries had worse registration domain scores (ρ = -0.27; p = 0.049). For the entire cohort, the registration and facility domains contributed the most variability to the total PGAS score, while the physician domain contributed the least. Few preoperative factors are associated with PGAS scores, and total PGAS scores do not significantly correlate with baseline PROMs. Surgeons may have limited ability to improve their PGAS scores given most of the variability in total scores stems from systemic aspects of the patient experience.

scholarly journals Mandatory Prescription Limits and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712110275
Author(s):  
Saygin Kamaci ◽  
Erdi Ozdemir ◽  
Christopher Utz ◽  
Angelo Colosimo
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Rebound Increase

Background: Because of the need for perioperative pain management, orthopaedic surgeons play an important role in opioid use. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the impact of opioid-limiting legislation on postoperative opioid use and pain-related complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The hypothesis was that the opioid-limiting legislation would reduce postoperative opioid use after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ACLR 1 year before and 1 year after Ohio's opioid-limiting legislation, which was passed in August 2017. Clinicians were prohibited from prescribing more than 30 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per day, with a maximum duration of 7 days for adults. The Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System database and patients’ medical charts were reviewed for prescriptions of all controlled substances (oral oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, codeine, tramadol, and hydromorphone) filled from 30 days before and 90 days after ACLR. The total number of postoperative prescriptions, total MMEs, the number of pills in each patient’s prescription, and pain-related complications (emergency department visits, office calls for pain control issues, unplanned readmissions, unplanned surgeries, and provider notes indicating opioid prescription refill demands) were evaluated. Results: A total of 243 patients (127 prelegislation, 116 postlegislation) were included in the study. There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative opioid use between the study groups. The number of pills prescribed initially decreased by 34% after legislation (63.5 ± 16.7 [prelegislation] vs 42 ± 15.7 pills [postlegislation]; P < .001). Correspondingly, there was a significant decrease in total quantity of initial prescriptions in the postlegislation period (474.6 ± 123.8 vs 310.7 ± 115.3 MMEs; P < .001). The number of documented pain medication refill demands and pain-related complications did not increase in the postlegislation period (42 prelegislation vs 43 postlegislation; P = .514). Preoperative opioid use was the strongest predictor of opioid-refill demand (odds ratio, 4.19 [95% CI, 1.76-9.99]; P = .001). Conclusion: After the Ohio legislation was passed limiting opioid prescription, there was a significant reduction in opioids provided for patients undergoing ACLR. In spite of this decrease, no rebound increase in refill demands or postoperative pain-related complications were observed.

scholarly journals Opioid Consumption After Arthroscopic Meniscal Procedures and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712091354
Author(s):  
Francis Lovecchio ◽  
Ajay Premkumar ◽  
Tyler Uppstrom ◽  
Jeffrey Stepan ◽  
Brittany Ammerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Meniscal Surgery ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Procedure-specific opioid-prescribing guidelines have the potential to decrease the number of unused pills in the home without compromising patient satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of data on the minimum necessary quantity to prescribe for outpatient orthopaedic surgeries. Purpose: To prospectively record daily opioid use and pain levels after arthroscopic meniscal procedures and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at a single institution. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 95 adult patients who underwent primary arthroscopic knee surgery (meniscectomy, repair, or ACLR) were enrolled. Patients with a history of opioid dependence were ineligible. Daily opioid consumption and Numeric Rating Scale pain scores were collected through an automated text-messaging platform starting on postoperative day 1 (POD1). At 6 weeks or at patient-reported cessation of opioid use, final survey questions were asked. Patients who failed to complete data collection were excluded. Opioid use was converted into “pills” (oxycodone 5-mg equivalents) to facilitate comparisons and clinical applications. Factors associated with high and low opioid use were compared. Results: Of the 95 patients enrolled, 71 (74.7%) were included in the final analysis. Of these, 40 (56.3%) underwent meniscal surgery and 31 (43.7%) underwent ACLR. After outpatient arthroscopic meniscectomy or repair, the total median postdischarge opioid use was 0.3 pills (oxycodone 5-mg equivalents), with 75% of patients consuming 3.3 or fewer pills (range, 0-19 pills). For ACLR, the median postdischarge consumption was 7 pills (75th percentile, 23.3 pills; range, 0-41 pills). Almost one-third of patients (32.3%) took no opioids after surgery (3 ACLR, 20 meniscus). All meniscus patients and 71% of ACLR patients ceased opioid consumption by postoperative day 7. Conclusion: Opioids may not be necessary in all patients, particularly after meniscal surgery and in comparison with ACLR. For patients requesting opioids for pain relief, reasonable prescription quantities are 5 oxycodone 5-mg pills after arthroscopic meniscal procedures and 20 5-mg pills after ACLR. Slowing the current opioid epidemic and preventing future crises is dependent on refining prescribing habits. Clinicians should strongly consider patient education regarding expected pain as well as pain management strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document