Impact of preoperative exercise in not initially candidates to native arteriovenous fistulas

Background: Native autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVFn) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis due to its long term patency and low complication rate. A challenging limitation is the anatomical inability to perform AVFn and failure of maturation. Preoperative isometric exercise (PIE) can increase vascular calibers and improve the rate of distal AVF. However, it is unknown whether PIE might enhance the performance of AVFn in patients who are not initially candidates. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted over a population of 45 patients evaluated in vascular access clinic, 23 were not initially candidates for radiocephalic (NRC-AVF) and 22 were not candidates for autologous fistula at all (NA-AVF). They were assigned to perform PIE with handgrip device and revaluated. Results: After 4–8 weeks of PIE, a AVFn was performed in 16 patients from NA-AVF group and a radiocephalic AVFn was performed in 21 patients from NRC-AVF group. Both groups experienced a significant and similar increase in venous caliber 0.91 ± 0.43 mm in NA-AVF versus 0.76 ± 0.47 mm in NRC-AVF ( p = 0.336) and arterial caliber 0.18 ± 0.24 mm versus 0.18 ± 0.21 mm ( p = 0.928), respectively. Nevertheless, primary failure rate was significantly higher in NA-AVF ( n = 8, 50%) than in NRC-AVF group ( n = 3, 14.3%) ( p = 0.030). After 6 months, the fistula usability for dialysis was only 50% in NA-AVF, while 86.7% were dialyzed by fistula in NRC-AVF group ( p = 0.038). Conclusions: PIE allowed the allocation of an AVFn in patients not initially candidates, but entailed a high rate of maturation failure. Patients not candidates to radiocephalic AVF benefited from PIE and preserved a long term usability of AVF for dialysis.

Effects of exercise training in people with non-small cell lung cancer before lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionExercise training before lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer is believed to decrease postoperative complications (POC) by improving cardiorespiratory fitness. However, this intervention lacks a strong evidence base.AimTo assess the effectiveness of preoperative exercise training compared with usual care on POC and other secondary outcomes in patients with scheduled lung resection.MethodsA systematic search of randomised trials was conducted by two authors. Meta-analysis was performed, and the effect of exercise training was estimated by risk ratios (RR) and mean differences, with their CIs. Clinical usefulness was estimated according to minimal important difference values (MID).ResultsFourteen studies involving 791 participants were included. Compared with usual care, exercise training reduced overall POC (10 studies, 617 participants, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75) and clinically relevant POC (4 studies, 302 participants, Clavien-Dindo score ≥2 RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.69). The estimate of the effect of exercise training on mortality was very imprecise (6 studies, 456 participants, RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.22). The main risks of bias were a lack of participant blinding and selective reporting. Exercise training appeared to improve exercise capacity, pulmonary function and also quality of life and depression, although the clinical usefulness of the changes was unclear. The quality of the evidence was graded for each outcome.ConclusionPreoperative exercise training leads to a worthwhile reduction in postoperative complications. These estimates were both accurate and large enough to make recommendations for clinical practice.

What are the impact and the optimal design of a physical prehabilitation program in patients with esophagogastric cancer awaiting surgery? A systematic review

Background Substantial postoperative complications occur after tumor resection for esophagogastric cancers. Physical prehabilitation programs aim to prepare patients for surgery by improving their functional status with the aim of reducing postoperative complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the effects of physical prehabilitation programs on exercise capacity, muscle strength, respiratory muscle function, postoperative outcomes, and health-related quality of life and to determine the optimal design of such a program to improve these outcomes in esophagogastric cancer patients undergoing tumor resection. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PEDro databases to identify studies evaluating the effects of physical prehabilitation program on exercise capacity, muscle strength, respiratory muscle function, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, mortality, and health-related quality of life in patients with esophagogastric cancer awaiting surgery. Data from all studies meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted. The quality of each selected study was determined using the Downs and Black checklist. Results Seven studies with 645 participants were included. The preoperative exercise program consisted of respiratory training alone in three studies, a combination of aerobic and resistance training in two studies, and a combination of respiratory, aerobic, and resistance training in two studies. Training frequency ranged from three times a day to twice a week and each session lasted between 20 and 75 min. Four studies were of fair quality and three of good quality. Some studies reported improvements in maximal inspiratory pressure, inspiratory muscle endurance, postoperative (pulmonary) complications, and length of hospital stay in the preoperative exercise group compared to the control group. Conclusion This systematic review reports the current evidence for physical prehabilitation programs in patients with esophagogastric cancer awaiting surgery. However, due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials, the significant heterogeneity of exercise programs, and the questionable quality of the studies, higher quality randomized controlled trials are needed. Trial registration PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42020176353.