A National Study of End-of-Life Care Among Older Veterans with Hearing and Vision Loss (RP508)

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Joan Carpenter ◽  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Francis Nelson ◽  
Daniel Kinder ◽  
Melissa Wachterman ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 817-825
Author(s):  
Joan G. Carpenter ◽  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Francis Nelson ◽  
Daniel Kinder ◽  
Melissa Wachterman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S668-S668
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Luth ◽  
Teja Pristavec

Abstract End-of-life care quality (EOLCQ) gauges our success in providing quality care to dying individuals. EOLQC measures rely on reports from bereaved family members who provide care for dying loved ones, but analyses seldom account for how caregivers’ experiences influence their EOLCQ perceptions. Caregivers frequently experience burden, which is linked to poor health outcomes and may negatively bias EOLCQ reports. Individuals may also perceive caregiving benefits that can offset deleterious burden effects, but potentially encourage overly positive EOLCQ perceptions. This paper links National Study of Caregivers (2011) and National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011-2016) data, using regression analysis and a sample of 380 EOL caregivers to examine how caregiving burden and benefits perceptions shape and moderate EOLCQ reports. Caregiving burden is unrelated to EOLCQ in adjusted models. Benefits are associated with marginally greater odds of being informed about the dying person’s condition and reporting their personal care needs were met. Burden and benefits moderate these two measures. Despite benefits, low burden caregivers report they were informed about the dying person’s condition with 90% probability. Regardless of burden, high benefits caregivers report the same with 90% probability. Low burden and benefits caregivers report met care needs with 90% probability. High burden and benefits caregivers have 90% probability of such reports. Given these reports are used in formal hospice care evaluations by CMS, additional research should explore why caregiving burden and benefit are associated with some EOLCQ measures and why individuals reporting high burden and benefits provide more positive EOLCQ appraisals.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-002952
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Emanuel ◽  
Julia Verne ◽  
Karen Forbes ◽  
Luke Hounsome ◽  
Katherine E Henson

BackgroundGood end-of-life care is essential to ensure dignity and comfort in death. To our knowledge, there has not been a national population-based study in England of community prescribing of all drugs used in end-of-life care for patients with cancer.Methods57 632 people who died from malignant cancer in their own home or in a care home in 2017 in England were included in this study. National routinely collected data were used to examine community prescriptions dispensed for drugs for symptom control and anticipatory prescribing by key sociodemographic factors in the last 4 months of life.Results94% of people who died received drugs to control their symptoms and 65% received anticipatory prescribing. Prescribing increased for the symptom control drug group (53% to 75%) and the anticipatory prescribing group (4% to 52%) over the 4-month period to death.ConclusionsMost individuals who died of cancer in their own home or a care home were dispensed drugs commonly used to control symptoms at the end of life, as recommended by best-practice guidance. Lower prescribing activity was found for those who died in a care home, highlighting a potential need for improved end-of-life service planning.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-430
Author(s):  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Dawn Smith ◽  
Diane Richardson ◽  
Carolyn Cannuscio ◽  
Denise Moore

2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 760-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M. Sullivan ◽  
Anne G. Warren ◽  
Matthew D. Lakoma ◽  
Karen R. Liaw ◽  
David Hwang ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan M. Teno ◽  
Andrea Gruneir ◽  
Zachary Schwartz ◽  
Aman Nanda ◽  
Terrie Wetle

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Hinson ◽  
Aaron J. Goldsmith ◽  
Joseph Murray

This article addresses the unique roles of social work and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in end-of-life and hospice care settings. The four levels of hospice care are explained. Suggested social work and SLP interventions for end-of-life nutrition and approaches to patient communication are offered. Case studies are used to illustrate the specialized roles that social work and SLP have in end-of-life care settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document