Why patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis improve or deteriorate with graded exercise therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cheshire ◽  
D. Ridge ◽  
L. Clark ◽  
P. White
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1318-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Geraghty ◽  
Mark Hann ◽  
Stoyan Kurtev

Cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise therapy are promoted as evidence-based treatments for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. This article explores patients’ symptom responses following these treatments versus pacing therapy, an approach favoured by many sufferers. We analyse data from a large cross-sectional patient survey ( n = 1428) and compare our findings with those from comparable patient surveys ( n = 16,665), using a mix of descriptive statistics and regression analysis modelling. Findings from analysis of primary and secondary surveys suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy is of benefit to a small percentage of patients (8%–35%), graded exercise therapy brings about large negative responses in patients (54%–74%), while pacing is the most favoured treatment with the lowest negative response rate and the highest reported benefit (44%–82%).


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 205510291880518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Vink ◽  
Alexandra Vink-Niese

The analysis of the 2017 Cochrane review reveals flaws, which means that contrary to its findings, there is no evidence that graded exercise therapy is effective. Because of the failure to report harms adequately in the trials covered by the review, it cannot be said that graded exercise therapy is safe. The analysis of the objective outcomes in the trials provides sufficient evidence to conclude that graded exercise therapy is an ineffective treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document