Everyday Ethics Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) Orders in Procedure Areas: To Suspend or Not to Suspend That is the Question

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
Susannah W. Lee ◽  
Jason Lesandrini
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 123-135
Author(s):  
Ronald Schleifer ◽  
Jerry B. Vannatta

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Tanimoto ◽  
Kumiko Kuroda ◽  
Yoshiyuki Tadokoro ◽  
Yoshiyuki Takahashi ◽  
Hiromi Shimada ◽  
...  

In Practice ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-174
Author(s):  
James Yeates
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-43
Author(s):  
Rosamond Rhodes

The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism rejects the well-entrenched views of medical ethics as everyday ethics or common morality applied to medicine. This chapter lays the foundation for the original account of medical ethics that follows in the book’s succeeding chapters. By presenting vivid examples and general arguments the author demonstrates ways in which the ethics of medicine is distinct and different from common morality. The chapter discusses the most popular common morality views, namely, the four principles approach expounded by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in Principles of Biomedical Ethics and the ten rules approach presented by Bernard Gert, Charles Culver, and K. Danner Clouser in Bioethics: A Systematic Approach by presenting arguments that challenge their applicability to medical practice. A chart identifies some stark differences between the common morality approach and good medical practice and shows how everyday ethics is incompatible with medical professionalism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document