scholarly journals Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1756-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bakir O. Sumrein ◽  
Ville M. Mattila ◽  
Vesa Lepola ◽  
Minna K. Laitinen ◽  
Antti P. Launonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Neer Classification

scholarly journals Erratum to: AST classification of proximal humeral fractures: introduction and interobserver reliability assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-368
Author(s):  
Christian Cuny ◽  
Cedric Baumann ◽  
Julien Mayer ◽  
Didier Guignand ◽  
M’barek Irrazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Reliability Assessment ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures

AST classification of proximal humeral fractures: introduction and interobserver reliability assessment

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Cuny ◽  
Cedric Baumann ◽  
Julien Mayer ◽  
Didier Guignand ◽  
M’barek Irrazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Reliability Assessment ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures

scholarly journals Interobserver Reliability of Classification and Characterization of Proximal Humeral Fractures

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (17) ◽  
pp. 1600-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy E Bruinsma ◽  
Thierry G Guitton ◽  
Jon JP Warner ◽  
David Ring
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures

scholarly journals The reliability and reproducibility of the Hertel classification for comminuted proximal humeral fractures compared with the Neer classification

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gijs I.T. Iordens ◽  
Kiran C. Mahabier ◽  
Florian E. Buisman ◽  
Niels W.L. Schep ◽  
Galied S.R. Muradin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Neer Classification

scholarly journals Reproducibility of three classifications of proximal humeral fractures

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo da Frota Carrerra ◽  
Andre Wajnsztejn ◽  
Mario Lenza ◽  
Nicola Archetti Netto
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Neer Classification ◽  
Posterior Shoulder ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Kappa Agreement ◽  
European Group

OBJECTIVE: To propose a new system for classifying proximal humeral neck fractures, and to evaluate intra- and interobserver agreement using the Neer system that is the most commonly used in the area and the Arbeit Gemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen system created by an European group, and a new classification system proposed by the authors of this study. METHODS: A total of 56 patients with proximal humeral fractures were selected, and submitted to digitized simple radiography in antero-posterior shoulder and scapular profile. Radiographs were analyzed by three observers at time one, and then three and six weeks later. The kappa coefficient modified by Fleiss was used for the analysis. RESULTS: The mean intra-observer Kappa agreement index (k=0.687) of the new classification, was higher than both the Neer classification (k=0.362) and the Arbeit Gemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (k=0.46). The mean interobserver Kappa agreement index (0.446) of the new classification, also had better results than both the Neer classification (k=0.063) and the Arbeit Gemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (k=0.028). CONCLUSION: the new classification considering bone compression had higher results for intra- and interobserver compared to the Neer system, and the Arbeit Gemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document