Minimal Damage to the Supinator Muscle After Double Incision Technique for Distal Biceps Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. e449-e450
Author(s):  
Davide Blonna ◽  
Alberto Olivero ◽  
Claudia Galletta ◽  
Valentina Greco ◽  
Filippo Castoldi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096777
Author(s):  
Davide Blonna ◽  
Alberto Olivero ◽  
Claudia Galletta ◽  
Valentina Greco ◽  
Filippo Castoldi ◽  
...  

Background: The effect of the double-incision technique on the supinator muscle is unclear. Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify fatty atrophy of the supinator muscle and map the area of muscle damage. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 19 male patients (median age, 43 years) who underwent distal biceps tendon repair were included in the analysis. Patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. The following variables were analyzed: range of motion; shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score; Summary Outcome Determination (SOD) score; and isokinetic peak force and endurance in supination. Quantitative analysis and mapping of fatty infiltration of the supinator muscle were based on the calculation of proton density fat fraction on magnetic resonance imaging scans of both elbows using the IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Echoes of Asymmetrical Length) sequence. Results: At an average follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-64 months), the median SOD score was 9.0 (95% CI, 7.8-9.4), and the mean QuickDASH score was 6.7 (95% CI, 0.0-14.1). A difference of 17% in peak torque was measured between repaired and nonrepaired elbows (repaired elbow: 9.7 N·m; nonrepaired elbow: 11.7 N·m; P = .11). Endurance was better in the repaired elbow than the nonrepaired elbow (8.4% vs 14.9% work fatigue, respectively; P = .02). The average fat fraction of the supinator muscle was 19% (95% CI, 16%-21%) in repaired elbows and 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) in contralateral elbows ( P = .04). The increase in fat fraction was located in a limited area between the radius and ulna at the level of the bicipital tuberosity. Conclusion: The assessment of the supinator muscle showed a limited increase in fat fraction between the radius and ulna at the level of the bicipital tuberosity. No significant effect on supination strength was highlighted.


Orthopedics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. e744-e748
Author(s):  
Todd P. Pierce ◽  
Casey M. Pierce ◽  
Kimona Issa ◽  
Vincent K. McInerney ◽  
Anthony Festa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711982731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham D. Pallante ◽  
Shawn W. O’Driscoll

Background: The hook test is a sensitive and specific tool that has been previously described for diagnosing distal biceps tendon ruptures in an efficient, cost-effective manner. However, its application in postoperative evaluations after surgical repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures is not documented. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesized that the hook test result returns to normal at some point postoperatively after distal biceps repair. This information could be used in decision making during follow-up examinations with both normal and abnormal findings. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of distal biceps repair. Between July 1, 2003, and July 1, 2016, a total of 56 patients underwent distal biceps repair and also had clear documentation of the results of the hook test during the postoperative period. Hook test results consisted of “intact,” “abnormal,” or “absent.” The timing of the return to a normal hook test result was recorded. Results: Overall, 51 of 57 (89%) repairs were documented to have the hook test result return to “intact.” The test result returned to intact by a mean of 10 weeks after surgery (range, 2 weeks to 15 months). The biceps tendon was intact according to the hook test at the 4-month follow-up in 45 of the 51 patients (88%) in whom it ultimately returned. The hook test result was abnormal in 5 repairs in 5 patients with only a short-term follow-up, ranging from 2 to 7 weeks postoperatively. One patient with an abnormal hook test result at 2 weeks postoperatively underwent revision and was confirmed to have a partial tear of the biceps insertion. His hook test result returned to intact 3 months after revision repair. Conclusion: The hook test result returns to normal in patients who undergo distal biceps repair in the primary and revision settings with adequate follow-up. The vast majority of patients have a normal hook test result by 4 months postoperatively. An abnormal hook test result at 4 months postoperatively may indicate a failed repair and should prompt further investigation.


1990 ◽  
Vol &NA; (253) ◽  
pp. 133???136 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH M. FAILLA ◽  
PETER C. AMADIO ◽  
BERNARD F. MORREY ◽  
ROBERT D. BECKENBAUGH

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Tyson Garon ◽  
Jeffrey A. Greenberg

2021 ◽  
pp. 835-852
Author(s):  
John J. Fernandez

Orthopedics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. e931-e935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Jones ◽  
Christopher M. Jones ◽  
Mark G. Grossman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document