Radiographic evaluation of a cross-shaped incision technique for thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis

Background To evaluate a cross-shaped incision technique for thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Methods Total 55 patients receiving cross-shaped incision were assigned into thick-gingiva group (29 cases) and thin-gingiva group (26 cases). Follow-up was performed at 3 and 12-month after final restoration. Results Mesial and distal papilla height was significantly greater in thick-gingiva group than thin-gingiva group at 3 and 12 months, while periodontal depth and crestal marginal bone level around implant had no significant difference between the two groups during follow-up. No case of recession of buccal marginal gingiva was observed in thick-gingiva group. However, the recession of marginal gingiva of buccal aspect of the crown was found in 5 patients (19.2%) with thin-gingiva. Conclusions The cross-shaped incision may be applied to reconstruct gingival papillae and avoid the gingival recession in patients with thick-gingiva phenotype. Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04706078, date 12 January 2021, Retrospectively registered).

A Noninferiority Analysis of 3- vs 2-Incision Techniques for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation

Objective The only hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) device available for US clinical use is implanted through 3 incisions. A recently proposed 2-incision modification moved the respiratory sensing lead from the fifth to the second intercostal space to eliminate the third lower chest incision. This study compared perioperative data and therapeutic outcomes between the techniques. Study Design Noninferiority cohort analysis of a retrospective and prospective registry study. Setting Tertiary care and community surgical centers. Methods Patients with obstructive sleep apnea underwent HNS implantation via a modified 2-incision technique (I2). A cohort previously implanted via the standard 3-incision technique (I3) were 1:1 propensity score matched for a noninferiority analysis of postoperative outcomes. Results There were 404 I3 patients and 223 I2 patients across 6 participating centers. Operative time decreased from 128.7 minutes (95% CI, 124.5-132.9) in I3 patients to 86.6 minutes (95% CI, 83.7-97.6) in I2 patients ( P < .001). Postoperative sleep study data were available for 76 I2 patients who were matched to I3 patients. The change in apnea-hypopnea index between the cohorts was statistically noninferior (a priori noninferiority margin: 7.5 events/h; mean difference, 1.51 [97.5% CI upper bound, 5.86]). There were no significant differences between the cohorts for baseline characteristics, perioperative adverse event rates, or change in Epworth Sleepiness Score ( P > .05). Conclusion In a multicenter registry, a 2-incision implant technique for a commercially available HNS device had a statistically noninferior therapeutic efficacy profile when compared with the standard 3-incision approach. The 2-incision technique is safe and effective for HNS implantation.

Distal biceps repair through a single incision with the use of a knotless cortical button device: Mid-term results

Background Distal biceps rupture presents with an increasing incidence and evidence suggests that although a surgical repair is not mandatory, it results in superior functional outcomes when compared to non-operative management. As implant technology has advanced, several devices have been utilised and studied in managing this pathology. We present our single-centre experience with the use of the ToggleLoc Ziploop reattachment device, a knotless cortical button implant, using a single-incision technique. Methods Retrospective series of 70 consecutive distal biceps tendon repairs, at a mean follow-up of 45.6 months after surgery, using a standardised single implant, single-incision technique, and post-operative rehabilitation programme. Results There was one (1.4%) re-rupture in our patient cohort. The range of motion was complete in all patients except for one patient who had symptomatic heterotopic ossification, causing limitation in pronation. Complications were minor with the commonest being transient neuropraxia of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm. The mean Oxford elbow score was 46.9 out of 48, and the patient global impression of change scale was 7 out of 7 in 77% of cases. Conclusion Our data support this technique and implant combination when dealing with acute and chronic distal biceps tendon rupture.

Lateral distal tibial locking compression plate fixation through single lateral incision technique is biologically superior and mechanically equivalent alternative to medial plate fixation for lower third tibia-fibula fractures

<p><strong>Background:</strong> A number of surgical options for management of distal tibia fractures makes scenario confusing and available techniques are associated with complications. Recently lateral plating of tibia has shown good promise. To compare results between medial and lateral distal tibial locking compression plate for treatment of distal third tibia fractures</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Prospective clinical study was carried out among 24 patients presenting with distal third tibia fractures. Patients were randomized into two groups of 12 each. One group was allocated into medial distal tibial LCP and second group was allocated into lateral distal tibial LCP. In first group, approach taken was medial or anteromedial while in second group, approach taken was lateral. Follow up was done for six months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> There were 10 cases in medical group and eight cases in lateral group which had fracture due to road traffic accidents. All cases in medical group had concomitant fibula fracture while such cases were 10 in lateral group. One case in each group developed infection after surgery. There was one case of superficial skin dehiscence and one case of hardware problem in medial group compared to none in lateral group. Two cases from medial group required removal of implant compared to none from medial group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Lateral distal tibial LCP seems to provide biological advantage than medial distal tibial LCP without difference in biomechanical properties of implants. Single lateral incision technique is an ingenious, biologically sound, and cosmetically superior for fixation of both lower third tibia &amp; fibula fractures together.</p>

Two-year results after combined phacoemulsification and iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens removal

Purpose To describe and present results after a technique for cataract surgery combined with explantation of an iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (IF-pIOL). Methods The medical records of all patients, who had undergone cataract surgery combined with IF-pIOL explantation and subsequent implantation of a posterior chamber IOL by the Single Incision Technique (SIT), were reviewed. Data collection included preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, and endothelial cell density (ECD) up to a follow-up time of 24 months. Results Fifty myopic eyes (34 patients) and 9 hyperopic eyes (6 patients) had undergone a SIT procedure mainly because of cataract (67%). Postoperative CDVA improved in both the myopic eyes to 0.16 ± 0.37 logMAR, as in the hyperopic eyes to − 0.10 ± 0.55 logMAR with no eyes having loss of Snellen lines. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent was − 0.34 ± 0.72 D and − 0.10 ± 0.55 D, respectively. ECD loss 6 months after surgery was 5% and remained stable thereafter. Conclusion SIT for combined phacoemulsification and IF-pIOL removal yields good visual and refractive results and is a safe procedure in regard to ECD loss. The technique has advantages over the conventional procedure and is easy to perform.

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness with cutback incision and without cut back incision technique on healing in patients between 18 to 65 years of age for socket preservation cases: A randomized controlled trial

Primary closure is the most important step following tooth extraction. Primary closure using cut back incision technique helps in preserving the bone graft in socket and to preserve it in their desired position. To assess the healing outcome with and without cut back incision technique in adult population for the purpose of socket preservation at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial forty-two sites were planned for extraction with bone augmentation and were randomly divided. In group 1 sockets were preserved using cutback incision technique and in group 2 sockets were grafted without cutback incision technique. Clinical standardized measurements were used to assess the dimensional alterations of the extraction socket. Various non-parametric tests have been used for comparisons. Intergroup comparison showed statistical higher difference on Pain on VAS (p &#62;0.00 6) and KGW (p 0.039) at 1 week and primary healing showed no significant results at all time intervals. The present finding concluded that use of cutback incision technique enhances primary closure and the socket seal of the extraction site with minimal pain, morbidity and low cost.