Early onset scoliosis treated by Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Mid- to long-term follow-up and analysis of 5 graduates

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-456
Author(s):  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung ◽  
Karen Yiu ◽  
Kenny Kwan ◽  
Kenneth M.C. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Early Onset ◽  
Early Onset Scoliosis ◽  
Growing Rods ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

Mean 6-Year Follow-up of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Patients With Early Onset Scoliosis: A Glimpse of What Happens to Graduates

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1112-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung ◽  
Karen Yiu ◽  
Kenny Kwan ◽  
Kenneth M C Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Skeletal Maturity ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Early Onset Scoliosis ◽  
Growing Rods ◽  
Initial Implantation ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod

AbstractBACKGROUNDThere is no agreement on frequency of distractions of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) but more frequent and smaller amounts of distractions mimic physiological spine growth. The mid- to long-term follow-up and management at skeletal maturity is unknown.OBJECTIVETo analyze patients with mean 6 yr of follow-up and describe the fate of MCGR graduates.METHODSEarly onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with MCGRs with minimum 4 yr of follow-up and/or at graduation were studied. Parameters under study included Cobb angle, spine and instrumented lengths, and rod distraction gains. Relationship between timing of rod exchanges with changes in rate of lengthening was studied.RESULTSTen EOS patients with mean 6.1 yr of follow-up were studied. The greatest Cobb angle correction occurred at the initial implantation surgery and was stable thereafter. Consistent gains in T1-12, T1-S1, and instrumented segment were observed. Rate of lengthening reduced after the first year of use but improved back to initial rates after rod exchange. Seven of the ten patients experienced complications with reoperation rate of 40% for rod distraction failure and proximal foundation problems. Only mild further improvements in all radiological parameters were observed pre- and postfinal surgery. No clinically significant curve progression was observed for rod removal only. All postfinal surgery parameters remained similar at postoperative 2 yr.CONCLUSIONThis study provides an outlook of the end of MCGR treatment. Although this is a fusionless procedure, instrumented segments do experience stiffness limiting further correction and length gain during final surgery whether fusion or rod removal is performed.

scholarly journals Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 405-414
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdelaal ◽  
Sudarshan Munigangaiah ◽  
Jayesh Trivedi ◽  
Neil Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Early Onset Scoliosis ◽  
Growing Rods ◽  
Angle Correction ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

Aims Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have been gaining popularity in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past decade. We present our experience with the first 44 MCGR consecutive cases treated at our institution. Methods This is a retrospective review of consecutive cases of MCGR performed in our institution between 2012 and 2018. This cohort consisted of 44 children (25 females and 19 males), with a mean age of 7.9 years (3.7 to 13.6). There were 41 primary cases and three revisions from other rod systems. The majority (38 children) had dual rods. The group represents a mixed aetiology including idiopathic (20), neuromuscular (13), syndromic (9), and congenital (2). The mean follow-up was 4.1 years, with a minimum of two years. Nine children graduated to definitive fusion. We evaluated radiological parameters of deformity correction (Cobb angle), and spinal growth (T1-T12 and T1-S1 heights), as well as complications during the course of treatment. Results The mean Cobb angles pre-operatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up were 70° (53 to 103), 35° (15 to 71) and 39° (15 to 65) respectively (p < 0.001). Further, there was a mean of 14° (-6 to 27) of additional Cobb angle correction upon graduation from MCGR to definitive fusion. Both T1-T12 and T1-S1 showed significant increase in heights of 27 mm and 45 mm respectively at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Ten children (23%) developed 18 complications requiring 21 unplanned operations. Independent risk factors for developing a complication were single rod constructs and previous revision surgery. Conclusion MCGR has the benefit of avoiding multiple surgeries, and is an effective tool in treatment of early-onset scoliosis. It also maintains the flexibility of the spine, allowing further correction at the time of definitive fusion. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:405–414.

scholarly journals Management and results of early-onset scoliosis with dual magnetically controlled growing rods: Additional preliminary results of spinal fusion surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 478-488
Author(s):  
Ömer Faruk Kılıçaslan ◽  
Mehmet Ali Tokgöz ◽  
Şevket Bütün ◽  
Vugar Nabi ◽  
Serdar Akalın
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Early Onset Scoliosis ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Growing Rods ◽  
Spinal Fusion Surgery ◽  
Length Increase ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of dual magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and to investigate the results of patients with definitive spinal fusion following MCGR. Patients and methods: A total of 15 patients (7 males, 8 females; mean age: 8.7±1.7 years; range, 6 to 10 years) with EOS who underwent dual MCGR and were prospectively followed between February 2013 and March 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, and the length of the spine between T1-T12 and T1-S1 were measured on preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographs. The 24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) was used to assess the functional outcomes before and after the operation. All complications during the treatment were recorded. Results: The mean follow-up was 27.8±10.4 (range, 12 to 60) months. The mean curve correction immediately after the index surgery and latest follow-up was 47.6% and 42.4%, respectively (p>0.05). At the last follow-up, there were no significant changes in mean Cobb and kyphosis angles. The mean T1-T12 length increase was 26.2±7.1 (range, 16 to 40) mm, while the mean T1-S1 length increase was 43.3±15.0 (range, 24 to 70) mm. Complications developed in four (26.6%) of 15 patients. Definitive spinal fusion surgery was performed in seven patients. Total mean Cobb angle difference between the final follow-up and fusion surgery was 9.3° (p=0.016) and kyphosis angle difference was -2.1° (p=0.349). After fusion surgery, total lengthening in T1-T12 and T1-S1 distance was 10.5 mm (p=0.036) and 15.0 mm (p=0.022), respectively. A significant increase in all subdomain scores of the EOSQ-24 (p<0.05), except for financial impact, was recorded in all patients. Conclusion: Dual MCGR technique is an effective, reliable, and robust treatment alternative for primary EOS. However, surgeons should be aware of the relatively high rate of complications. In addition, residual deformity can be corrected successfully with definitive surgery.

scholarly journals Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 405-414
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdelaal ◽  
Sudarshan Munigangaiah ◽  
Jayesh Trivedi ◽  
Neil Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Early Onset Scoliosis ◽  
Growing Rods ◽  
Angle Correction ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

Aims Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have been gaining popularity in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past decade. We present our experience with the first 44 MCGR consecutive cases treated at our institution. Methods This is a retrospective review of consecutive cases of MCGR performed in our institution between 2012 and 2018. This cohort consisted of 44 children (25 females and 19 males), with a mean age of 7.9 years (3.7 to 13.6). There were 41 primary cases and three revisions from other rod systems. The majority (38 children) had dual rods. The group represents a mixed aetiology including idiopathic (20), neuromuscular (13), syndromic (9), and congenital (2). The mean follow-up was 4.1 years, with a minimum of two years. Nine children graduated to definitive fusion. We evaluated radiological parameters of deformity correction (Cobb angle), and spinal growth (T1-T12 and T1-S1 heights), as well as complications during the course of treatment. Results The mean Cobb angles pre-operatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up were 70° (53 to 103), 35° (15 to 71) and 39° (15 to 65) respectively (p < 0.001). Further, there was a mean of 14° (-6 to 27) of additional Cobb angle correction upon graduation from MCGR to definitive fusion. Both T1-T12 and T1-S1 showed significant increase in heights of 27 mm and 45 mm respectively at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Ten children (23%) developed 18 complications requiring 21 unplanned operations. Independent risk factors for developing a complication were single rod constructs and previous revision surgery. Conclusion MCGR has the benefit of avoiding multiple surgeries, and is an effective tool in treatment of early-onset scoliosis. It also maintains the flexibility of the spine, allowing further correction at the time of definitive fusion. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:405–414.

Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 99-B (6) ◽  
pp. 708-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. P. Rushton ◽  
I. Siddique ◽  
R. Crawford ◽  
N. Birch ◽  
M. J. Gibson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Onset ◽  
Early Onset Scoliosis ◽  
Growing Rods ◽  
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

Choice of Antenatal Steroids for Prevention of Complications of Prematurity: Betamethasone Versus Dexamethasone

2021 ◽  
pp. 097321792110483
Author(s):  
Tanushree Sahoo ◽  
Abhishek Somasekhara Aradhya ◽  
Kanya Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Lower Cost ◽  
Antenatal Steroids ◽  
Term Adverse Effect ◽  
Early Onset Sepsis ◽  
Poor Neurological Outcome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Antenatal steroids (ANS) are proven strategies to maximize outcomes of premature neonates without any major maternal side effects. Their use results in decreased incidence of neonatal mortality and major morbidities (respiratory distress syndrome, early onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage). However, due to concerns of long-term adverse effect (early onset hypertension and poor neurological outcome), a close follow-up is required. Similarly, due to lack of long-term follow-up data and potential risk of hypoglycemia, a cautious use is recommended in late preterms and elective cesareans. There is currently no consensus regarding preferential use of one ANS over the other. The current review therefore tried to address these issues for use of ANS in Indian prospective in light of recent emerging evidence. Due to better safety profile, lesser side effects, lower cost, and easy storage, we recommend dexamethasone as a steroid of choice for antenatal prophylaxis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document